If that is true then post the audio that goes with the video and let's hear what she was saying the whole time.
That is your latest theory to divert from the clear evidence of battery.
If she was taunting them then she was interfering with police business and probably trying to start a riot -- perhaps the October Surprise. I also notice that she was trying to run away from the officer until he caught her with a punch. It sure stopped her from running and running her mouth off as well.
Conservatives understand this. Progressives defend woman-beating.
Conservatives do not want an October Surprise or rioting in the streets or someone trying to cause it. And if it is a woman trying to cause a riot then she deserves to be dealt with as the law allows.
You seem to be invested in this video. How come you didn't tell us that she was taunting the police??? Why did you lie about what was really going on here???
Once again, you are attempting to distract from what is plainly evident in the video—a police officer punched a private citizen.
A man punched a woman.
A government employee committed battery against a non-government employee.
That action is unacceptable. Period. Unless one supports the progressive notion that hitting women is justifiable.
By the way, a police officer who chooses to punch a private citizen arguable is attempting to start a riot.
If you don’t want an October Surprise, as you claim, stop defending government employees who commit assault and battery against private citizens.