Also, Robert Bork is on Mitt’s advisory team on judicial appointments, and that’s, hopefully, a good thing. Right?
Unfortunately, I don’t trust Willard to do the right thing. I can understand how a voter’s principles does not allow them to vote for Willard. I was one of them until Roberts stepped in to snatch victory from certain defeat of Socialist SoetoroCare. Abortion will be supported by the Roberts court. Any legislation outlawing abortion will be struck down by the SC. I cannot change the game. I can only adapt to it. The Roberts Court must be diffused. Romney is the only one who could change it. Odds are not great, but another choice is certain death for unborn. I’ll take the long odds.
“”Also, Robert Bork is on Mitt’s advisory team on judicial appointments, and that’s, hopefully, a good thing. Right?””
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork
“Although an opponent of gun control,[29] Bork has denounced what he calls the “NRA view” of the Second Amendment, something he describes as the “belief that the constitution guarantees a right to Teflon-coated bullets.” Instead, he has argued that the Second Amendment merely guarantees a right to participate in a government militia.[30]”
Not to me.
LLS