lol, I was also going to make the same statement.
Posted on 08/01/2012 11:18:33 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
Your claim that marriage vital records for BHO and SADO are PUBLIC records is FALSE. They are vital records protected by privacy from all but a narrow list of persons with “a direct and tangible interest” in the record in HI for 75 years.
What may be true in your own state is not necessarily true in HI, FReepers and other patriots found when they actually took the trouble to personally try to obtain vital records in HI. IIRC, this isn't the first time you have tried to generalize from your personal experience in your state to the state of HI.
So you have spammed the thread with nonsense, yet another form of trolling by Mal-Val supporters.
See:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/vol06_ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.htm
§338-18 Disclosure of records. (a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.
(b) The department shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record. The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record:
(1) The registrant;
(2) The spouse of the registrant;
(3) A parent of the registrant;
(4) A descendant of the registrant;
(5) A person having a common ancestor with the registrant;
(6) A legal guardian of the registrant;
(7) A person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant;
(8) A personal representative of the registrant's estate;
(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;
(10) Adoptive parents who have filed a petition for adoption and who need to determine the death of one or more of the prospective adopted child's natural or legal parents;
(11) A person who needs to determine the marital status of a former spouse in order to determine the payment of alimony;
(12) A person who needs to determine the death of a nonrelated co-owner of property purchased under a joint tenancy agreement; and
(13) A person who needs a death certificate for the determination of payments under a credit insurance policy.
(c) The department may permit the use [of] the data contained in public health statistical records for research purposes only, but no identifying use thereof shall be made.
(d) Index data consisting of name and sex of the registrant, type of vital event, and such other data as the director may authorize shall be made available to the public.
(e) The department may permit persons working on genealogy projects access to microfilm or other copies of vital records of events that occurred more than seventy-five years prior to the current year.
Don't pull that stunt again.
I won't.
And she's still actively posting as of a few days ago.
She’ll either respond to your reply or not.
It's just me, all alone, here on this side of the monitor, not more than one person.
No offense, but you could've worded that much better.
OH SHEESH....it was a GENERIC “you guys” as in anyone reading this thread...I put the person I was talking about in the reply..and I was replying to the last post in my browser.
IT COULD HAVE BEEN ANYONE.
What month do you live in???
This is AUGUST in the real world..not April.
I don’t care whether she responds or not.
I am looking to see if anyone has figured out if her dad went to school with Obama, Sr.
This is AUGUST in the real world..not April.
Much like dog years, that is a few days ago in terms of "posting history".
Don't your "years" here seem just like days at times. Mine do.
If I confused you then my apologies. I should have been more explanatory.
Good God, get off my back.
I ask if any of you guys had figured out if she was a plant. I posted a link.
Since you don’t know...GET OFF MY BACK.
One FReeper’s poorly worded comment, in particular, drew an especially defensive and revealing reaction.
I'm glad you gave me the keyword "father" to look for or I wouldn't have bothered even reading the link as the article is rather long.
No, I have no info on her father or her family.
Don't get snippy with me because of your laziness in not removing my name from the "To" box!
You should've removed my name when you placed her name in the "To" box and placed "All" there instead if your reply was meant to go to anybody who might be reading this thread.
It's just easier to lash out at "the big bad ogre", isn't it.
You are real piece of work. You keep dragging this on and on and on.
I made a generic post. Yours was the post I responded to because it was in my browswer...and you are throwing a HISSY fit because you don’t like the way I worded a post.
GET LOST
he can’t help himself...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2913366/replies?c=638
http://www.spindletopmhmr.org/
GET LOST
Are you the site owner?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.