Skip to comments.Sex with animals still not OK in U.S. military
Posted on 02/26/2012 10:01:56 PM PST by Rabin
(UCMJ), Article 125: any service member who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same sex or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Offenders face court-martial for any violations. Pentagon officials say the deletion of (The section covering carnal copulation with cats and rats and elephants), Article 125, bestiality is a legal technicality and does not represent any fundamental change in the militarys moral code for service members (and service animals). (WND), Les Kinsolving, asked (Quisling), Jay Carney: Does the commander in chief approve or disapprove of bestiality in our armed forces? Carney refused to answer, which in turn prompted a stinging rebuke from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
(Excerpt) Read more at stripes.com ...
Wow. It's Quiet Here...
When the protests start in DC it will
be like having the circus come to town.
Just one more indication of the unbelievable sickness of this administration and of the society that supports it.
People have the right to have sex any way they want it. Once one restriction is removed it paves the way to remove all of them. Its only a matter of time. Having sex with animals will one day be legal in the military. And everywhere else too since it is a sexual orientation...
Yes! Marriage— Govt pensions for beasts!
Not with my cats you don’t.
People who have sex with animals are sick. Whether they can be cured or not is another question.
However, animals have to be protected from the predations of man (and women - i.e. esp. horses and dogs).
Not all human activity is legal, moral, ethical, or just plain allowable.
How about humpy-backed camels? Chimpanzees? (Actually this puts the "humpy-backed camel" think in a WHOLE new light)
And that is my point exactly. The definition of what is wrong morally can be challenged. And unfortunately it is being challenged. One boundary coming down today another one tomorrow. Those who wish to be immoral will continue to push the boundaries...until there are none.
But, for how long Jim....For HOW LONG
I thought you were kidding with your first comment. I said to myself, this person has a terrific “straight-face” sense of humor.
On second thought, you HAD TO have been joking with your first comment. Forgive me, it’s late here on the east coast.
I think the Democrats will push for full acceptance of pedophilia, sex with young boys, etc., first, and then they will move on to sex with animals. Just my opinion. In fact, I think the Democrats already are well underway, beneath the surface, in attempting to normalize pedophilia. They are patient in their sickness. Very patient.
Everybody with a paraphilia is evil.
God didn't flood the world and ZOT Sodom & Gomorrah because people were "sick".
(don't ask, don't tell for sheep)
The mere fact that the issue of having sex with animals even has to be addressed is a good indicator of which direction our country is heading.
My sister was in the military.....and the moose..well.... you know how the rest of the story goes.
To hell in a hand basket is my guess.
Case in point, I have snakes.
[Lesson learned; be -very- careful when you search for snake videos on YouYube]
*Snakes*, for God’s sake.
They're born that way - perfectly natural.
“And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”
And then....it rained.
Sex with animals still not OK in U.S. military - YET!
Don’t Ask, Don’t BAAAAAAAAAH.
Only half joking. :)
I would not count on that. expect someone more wicked than he to get power one day. I pray that I won't be here to see it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.