Posted on 05/27/2022 10:03:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
I’ve heard of the Minnesota Runestone being fake, but I’m not sure what you mean by “other evidence is apocryphal.” The creation myths aren’t; the etymological intrusion isn’t; and while the Indians I referred to are from Ontario, the presence on the Great Lakes would make Minnesota seem inevitable.
ON THE TOPIC OF HISTORICAL DEBATE OF WHAT I’VE WRITTEN:
There’s an alternate etymology of Rus, from a longer word meaning “oarsmen.” When two etymologies seem reasonably well supported, I expect the word caught on because it “seemed correct” from both sides, that having multiple valid meanings is a force multiplier to promote the new word.
“What a surprise that a people group known for raping, pillaging, and taking prisoners, isn’t genetically pure.”
Exactly. The results confirm what was already known, yet are presented as revelatory.
>>but I’m not sure what you mean by “other evidence is apocryphal.”<<
What concrete, verified evidence is there, outside of the disputed MN runestone?
Local legends and Indians reportedly with red hair don’t count as evidence, although they are interesting.
It’s like a genetic Hokey Pokey speculation that never really ends.
So that’s what it’s all about?
And, that they all had Covid-19...!!! ;-
ask tor heirdahl...
he sailed it in a paper boat.
We wuz vikangz...
Consider that the Vikings brought back so many female captives as to permanently alter the gene pool. Also young males, genetically non-vikings, were captured, adopted and raised as Vikings. Twelve hundred later Breifne, Connaught, and Leatrim are still awash with Viking “blood”.
My father is predominantly Irish as both of his grandparents came from Ireland but he had black hair when young. He was told he was black Irish, a trait that came from the Mediterranean area but had migrated to Ireland.
Huge swaths of Russia have Viking antecedents.
East Ridings, lots of Vikings. York started out as a Viking village.
Vikings were crusading for diversity, equity, and inclusion. ;-)
Murdered? My, are we judgemental. If they had the nerve to fight back then the went to Valhalla. We simply released their souls.
Hrothrekr
🪓
Historians have known all of this (except they had no genetic proof) for decades now. This IS NOT NEW
Wow, it is almost as if diversity is built into the genome by design.
LOL!
It’s pretty much accepted that he got at least as far as Greenland.
Smart people, those Vikings — named the green one Iceland and the icy one Greenland.
I just stumbled upon this interesting paper: The Influence of the Vikings in the East Riding of Yorkshire, by Andrew Stewart, May 2, 2019.
Further Evidence of Viking Influence in the East Riding of Yorkshire, by Andrew Stewart, December 7, 2017. ANDREW STEWARTDEC 7, 2017
It had everything to do with the Vikings themselves having risen to power in a lot of spots in Europe. William I was had Scandinavian ancestry and his conquest of England endured (the House of Normandy and the Plantagenet dynasty that followed were all Wm's descendants, give or take some whoring around by their moms).
In western Europe, standing armies that were well equipped, well trained, and well led had become the rule rather than the exception. Hardraada's death at Stamford Bridge marked the end of centuries of continual Scandinavian incursions in the British Isles.
In Sicily, the Normans drove out the muzzies, and their kingdom was set up with the blessing of one of the (anti-)Popes. The other Pope wanted the territory for himself, and brought in a couple of greater powers to destroy it. He managed to get it roughed up, and partly dismantled, but he never gained territory. Evenutally the Pope was captured and compelled to recognize the Norman dynasty and sign a treaty.
Later the Norman Sicilians conquered part of what is now Libya.
In the east, there was a Norman Crusader principality with a capital in Antioch. The Crusaders and the Armenians created buffer states that extended the existence of the Byzantine (eastern Roman) Empire, but of course along came a Byzantine idiot who thought it made more sense to destroy the Armenian capital and kingdom, helping to usher in the fall of Constantinople within a century. All those underground towns in Anatolia either appeared or were rehab'ed during that period of insecurity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.