It’ll be 28 years ago this fall. It’s hard to believe how quickly the time has flown by. When I was doing my post-doc, I got accepted to our med school. They told me, “Don’t worry about the money.” But I did. I wish now I had been as bold then as I had with pursuing the doctorate. Oh, well.
At least I’ve enjoyed my time in academic science until the political weirdos decided to drop global warming for what they thought would be a more threatening menace to manipulate people with, and then my school said, “Oh, yeah. We had said before that vaccination was voluntary but in order to get as many people vaccinated as possible, we’re making it mandatory.”
Of course, what that really meant was, “Oh, shit! Almost everyone is telling us to pound sand. The Biden Administration is going to screw us for an ungodly amount of fines. And, no, we’re not even going to wait to see how it turns out in the courts.”
Which, I’ve been happy to point out to them has left them with a pretty huge liability to the people they’ve already fired or successfully coerced into getting shot up with this stuff.
I told them A. I’m never getting vaccinated with something as crazy as that and B. They’re not going to fire me, either and then ccd that letter to a former federal prosecutor who’s working on cases like this and told them I’d send them a copy of my brief, which I did later, also ccd to the attorney in which I went through in great detail all their violations of law, ethical violations, incoherent reasoning and self-contradictions, and serious conflicts of interest.
Their whole Covid policy was one that paid much more attention to what they believed were “the optics” of helping people while utterly ignoring the unintended consequences of deliberately hurting tens of thousands of employees in a variety of ways in order to maybe help a minuscule number of folks to avoid getting infected with a common cold virus that statistically would have almost zero impact on the employee and especially the student population. It was a perfect example of CYA committee-think.
Pretty much. All of the trouble and more of serious viral infection with almost none of the benefits of a traditional protein vaccine. Here's something else to consider:
Isn’t It Just a Little TOO Weird? After well over 100 years of more rather than less successful vaccinations using protein antigens (proteins from either destroyed viruses or bacteria) that do NOTHING directly to any of your cells but train the T and B cells of your adaptive immune system to be on the lookout for the real thing in the future and to make antibodies against them:
1. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that 4 separate companies just happened to use techniques that they had been working on for over 20-30 years of development (or had acquired the rights to) to target mostly cancer cells for chemotherapy for which they had never been able to get approval either because the products didn’t work or because they targeted and messed up OTHER cells than the sick ones?
Consider the thinking that had to have been taking place in corporate headquarters before embarking on such a course:
“Hey, we’ve never been able to get this drug delivery vehicle approved yet. So now, when we’re standing on the edge of the biggest windfall in the history of medicine and are facing stiff competition from other companies to be the first to the trough, what would be the most sure fire way to success? Hmm, hey, I know! Let’s put all our chips on what has been, up to this point, a certain failure.”
And that was supposed to have happened independently 4 times?
I don’t think so.
______***______2. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that the folks from those four companies just happen to be putting the SAME thing into their different delivery vehicles and are all now using them to carry viral RNA into ANY cells their products come into contact with (with the exception, perhaps, the AstraZeneca product in the UK that actually uses a chimpanzee cold virus as the cargo vehicle which may rely on a specific cell surface receptor to gain entry, but after which it acts in exactly the same way as the other three)?
I’m pretty sure that if any of these companies had been asked, “Why didn’t you use those delivery vehicles to carry in viral antigens?” you would have gotten replies along these lines:
“Because if those viral antigens were introduced directly to the interior of healthy cells, they would not be immediately visible to the innate immune system in order to trigger the training of the adaptive immune system toward the end of specific antibody production”
Or “Because in addition to that being the wrong place to target, the total quantity would be too small and there would be no way for it to exit the cell”
Or “Introducing viral proteins directly into the cytosol of healthy cells could trigger the innate immune system to attack the cell as having been invaded by a virus, the proof being the presence of viral protein where there should be none”
Which all would provoke a series of questions like this:
“So why are you putting viral mRNA into healthy cells?"
"If viral antigens introduced by your delivery vehicle couldn’t get out, then how will the many, many copies of the viral spike protein antigen be able to get out?"
"And if viral proteins introduced by your delivery vehicles into the cytosol of healthy cells could trigger the innate immune system to attack them as having been virally infected, then wouldn’t your product introducing viral mRNA to hijack cellular protein synthesis to produce a giant load of viral protein be even more certain, by the presence of
a. viral mRNA,
b. viral protein, and
c. unregulated protein synthesis,
to trigger the innate immune system to attack those cells as having been virally infected and hopelessly compromised?”
None of which questions those companies would be eager to answer in any truthful way because of the impact it would have on getting an EUA.
So, based on all the above, was there collusion between these pharmaceutical companies to use equally experimental drug delivery systems in essentially exactly the same fashion so that:
A. to turn down one would be to turn down all, leaving the government as the bad guy standing in the way of progress and the single way those companies had identified as the ONLY way that could save billions upon billions of lives but
B. to okay one for emergency use authorization, at least for companies with a strong corporate presence in the US, would be to okay them all for EUA and provide all three EUA access to the federal feeding trough as well as the opportunity to recoup all that money in research and development up until that point they had wasted on these defective targeted drug delivery vehicles, and
C. to hold off official US approval for any one of them because as soon as that happened the EUAs for the other two would immediately end (which would provide lobbyists FOR their own company’s approval and lobbyists against the other companies’ approval by maintaining the EUA status for all three of them steady income and result in lots of “concerned” members of Congress needing to take LOTS of meetings with both groups of lobbyists to help them “understand the nuances of the situation toward eventually, many years down the line, being able to sort it out”?
______***______3. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that their drug delivery vehicles that were too dangerous to use in treating cancer were allowed, without completing the official FDA approval process proving safety and efficacy, to be used on a frigging COLD virus with a survival rate of over 99.4% in the ~40% of the population that are not already resistant to it like the other 60% have been since before it popped on the scene?
______***______4. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that there is such an insane push in many countries around the world (and in Democrat states and by a Democrat occupying the White House) to prevent people from working or going to certain stores or restaurants or school or to travel unless they have been vaccinated with just THOSE vaccines whether they actually need them or not or whether they want them or not?
Perhaps politicians of dictatorial bent all over the world are looking at the C19 phenomenon in the same way the pharmaceutical companies do:
Pharmaceutical companies: the chance of a lifetime for an unlimited amount of money and zero liability
Leftist politicians: the chance of a lifetime for an unlimited amount of power and zero accountability
Either of the two groups being the essential player to guarantee the success of the other.
The nations’ people the ones who have to pay for it all and who must, at all costs, be kept by both players in that position:
By the governments—controlling them through a vast interlocking series of feats of social engineering and threats of legal action
By the pharmaceutical companies—using an unending series of variants that make for continual deadly threats.
By the governments—saying “If you don’t comply, we will punish you selfish few for endangering the whole of society.”
By the pharmaceutical companies—saying “If you don’t comply, you could die from this avalanche of disease against which we are your only defense.”
______***______5. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that those same companies that couldn’t get those products approved by the government for treating cancer either because their products didn’t work or because they caused harm are now being given a pass by the same government to protect them from lawsuits for ANY problems, including the products failing to work as promised or causing injury or death to those taking them (in some cases to people in close contact with recipients and getting contaminated with the products just by physical contact) and to those being forced to take them who refused because they knew the danger those products posed?
______***______6. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that the doctor and researcher, Dr. Malone, who developed the therapeutic technique of using mRNA has said that NO ONE should ever use it this way and not with those companies’ delivery devices, is getting banned from social media and stories about him are getting deleted by social media groups?
______***______7. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird that all of the effing social media groups that are run by leftists and who are big financial contributors to Democrat politicians (one of which spent hundreds of millions to set up illegal ballot collection boxes in an attempt to give Biden an edge) who are not doctors, who are not scientists, and who have no frigging clue what they’re talking about scientifically or medically are all promoting the EFF out of these particular products and censoring or suspending users who criticize them?
How is it that at every point that dates back to about that same week early in 2020 when the Chinese claimed the US was responsible for the Wuhan breakout and the media flipped to that narrative in the space of 24 hours, that these social media companies have been in lockstep with whichever way the folks in the government were choosing to spin things; that is, not merely in attitude, but in an almost daily morphing of narrative details, in the development of ad hoc memes used to demonize opponents or to justify the evolving narrative.
It’s at about the same level on chance (and for exactly the same reasons and involving the same players) that the major stories in the major media are the same each day, covered in the same order, using the same catchphrases and keywords, and with no substantive differences in interpretation.
Think of it.
Out of literally billions of things happening each day all around the world, the same few events, involving the same few people, are focused on or ignored in the same way and in the same order by the media presenters, and characterized by them using the same descriptors. And that happens day in and day out.
There is ZERO way that is happening by chance.
Look at the odds of guessing all the digits of the Powerball number and getting them in the right order. Yet, the media has many hundreds of times more players than the Powerball has numbers and yet the media all manage to come up with the same thing, the same order, the same day, and described with the same language day in and day out. By chance? There’s not a effing way in hell.
______***______8. Isn’t it just a little TOO weird, in spite of everything that is coming to light about the inherent defectiveness of and serious danger posed by these products (especially when defectiveness and danger to far lesser degrees with other products, even vaccines, were sufficient to get them yanked off the market), that all those people are just pushing for more and more use of exactly the same products in exactly the same way to fix a problem that the products already failed to fix?
You could think, perhaps, that just by chance things have unexpectedly turned to shit on the vaccine front and now, by chance, all of these guys are just trying to cover their asses and are doing so in ways that, again, simply by chance, gives the appearance of coordination. The odds of that being chance multiplied by the odds of every single one of all those other operations being chance is one in a number greater than all the atoms in the universe.
When you have THIS many coincidences and THIS many things that just make no sense at all in the context of vaccinations, then you can be sure of two things:
1) It’s no coincidence, and
2) It’s being done for reasons OTHER than vaccinations, reasons they are just refusing to tell you about.
That should scare the shit out of you.
And it should also prompt you to get ready to fight whatever that hidden reason may turn out to be because people who impose defective and dangerous products on people by the billions worldwide, who criticize and bully them for resisting, and who are busy using all that to put over on people some other much larger kind of secretive bullshit, are NOT doing that for any good reason.