Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who’s the first person in a chain of people Kyle Rittenhouse should attempt to sue?
20 Nov 21 | BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Posted on 11/20/2021 8:18:39 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: BenLurkin

“How many times do you want him to be deposed?”

Deposition, schmeposition — when you’ve got ‘em by the short-n-curlies Depo is where you go to scare the ever-loving $#!+ out of their attorneys.

Kyle has danced with the Devil and kicked his f’n ass; there’s no cabal of corporate lawyers he needs to be afraid of.


41 posted on 11/21/2021 12:47:38 AM PST by HKMk23 (The right of freedom of religion shall not be derogated even if the life of the nation is at stake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch
He has no immunity for defamatory statements he makes to the press>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

As to Binger, i am not talking a defamation law suit brought by Kyle.

I think that the manner in which Binger brought the criminal charges aganst Kyle,without finishing an investigation, and the ethical abandonment of justice in order to conduct a political trial is a :

VIOLATION OF RITTENHOUSE'S CIVIL RIGHTS

IMHO, this is actionable in Federal Court,

It has nothing to do with defamation.

42 posted on 11/21/2021 3:59:40 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
Kyle should contact Nick Sandmann’s attorney to help him figure that out.

Lin Wood? Wouldn't Rittenhouse would do better with an attorney who was, I don't know, sane?

43 posted on 11/21/2021 4:54:36 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Was Kyle Rittenhouse the underaged minor, being paid to provide security for the car dealerships?

The car dealership owners said no early on in the trual. And like a Columbo moment, Columbo would scratch an actual itch on his head and have to ask...

But the jury stripped it down to nuts and bolts and the rest is history rightly or rightly.


44 posted on 11/21/2021 5:25:21 AM PST by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wgmalabama
"We are approaching the court of death."

The tree of liberty needs water.

"There's nothing wrong with a little shooting, as long as the right people get shot."

-Inspector "Dirty" Harry Callahan

45 posted on 11/21/2021 6:25:35 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Prosecutors have civil immunity for those actions, too.


46 posted on 11/21/2021 6:27:30 AM PST by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Don’t know if this is possible as far as damages, but in addition to a big check, I’d like to see each of these people make a public apology.


47 posted on 11/21/2021 6:28:10 AM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

Prosecutors have civil immunity for those actions, too.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

True if they are Federal prosecutors otherwise in jeopardy. Not so with State prosecutors who violate federal law via the Civil Rights statute.

How do you think all of those prosecutors after black voters in the Southern States were handled back in the day?


48 posted on 11/21/2021 6:30:27 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Be careful what you wish for. Civil trials are not like criminal trials. The standards for evidence are different, unanimous jury verdicts are not needed, and ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ is not the requirement the jury has to meet. Only ‘preponderance of the evidence’.


49 posted on 11/21/2021 6:49:30 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyM

Whoopie


50 posted on 11/21/2021 7:07:34 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

No, not Lin Wood; Sandmann has terminated him as one of his attorneys.


51 posted on 11/21/2021 9:11:05 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
No, not Lin Wood; Sandmann has terminated him as one of his attorneys.

After he had gotten him settlements from CNN and New York Times.

52 posted on 11/21/2021 9:43:49 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I just learned that Rittenhouse originally retained Lin Wood to represent him, but he did such a poor job that Rittenhouse dumped him.


53 posted on 11/23/2021 8:08:10 AM PST by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson