Posted on 01/15/2021 9:48:01 AM PST by nevergore
With all the craziness one issue has been lost on me...
Okay....a lot of issues.... but this one stands out....
We were promised so much.....Definitive proof, multiple lawsuits....litigation, etc.....
Where did these two attorneys disappear so quickly?
Where's the Kracken?
Anything?
(Excerpt) Read more at FreeRepublic.com ...
When a case is dismissed for any one of the grounds upheld in Pearson, the Defendant has no need to respond to alleged but legally meaningless witnesses or claims.
The Court held a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of Plaintiff standing.
Pearson v Kemp, GAND 20-cv-4809, Doc 43, (3 Dec 2020) Motion to Dismiss
COME NOW THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF GEORGIA, INC., the DSCC, and the DCCC (collectively, the “Democratic Political Party Committees”), by and through their attorneys, and file this Proposed Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).
Doc 43-1, (3 Dec 2020) BRIEF in Support of Motion to Dismiss
The Court should dismiss this case on multiple grounds. Plaintiffs lack Article III standing to bring their claims, and further lack prudential standing to assert the Georgia General Assembly’s interests. Georgia law is clear that Plaintiffs’ claim for an election contest cannot be heard in federal court. And Plaintiffs’ extraordinary delay in bringing suit additionally means laches bars their claims. Any of these jurisdictional bars independently precludes this Court’s adjudication of Plaintiffs’ suit.
Pearson v Kemp, GAND 20-cv-4809, Doc 63, (5 Dec 2020) Motion to Dismiss
Defendants Governor Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and State Election Board members Rebecca N. Sullivan, David J. Worley, Matthew Mashburn, and Ahn Le (collectively, “State Defendants”) hereby move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and various other threshold defenses stated in the accompanying brief in support. The State Defendants also move that the Court deny any injunctive, declaratory relief, and other relief sought in the Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
- - - - - - - - - -
Pearson v Kemp, GAND 20-cv-4809, Doc 63-1, (5 Dec 2020) BRIEF in Support of Motion to Dismiss
- - - - - - - - - -
Pearson v Kemp, GAND 20-cv-4809, Doc 74 (7 Dec 2020) MINUTE SHEET, CASE DISMISSED
PROCEEDINGCATEGORY: Motion Hearing (PI or TRO Hearing-Evidentiary);
MOTIONS RULED ON:
[43]Motion to Dismiss GRANTED
[63]Motion to Dismiss GRANTEDMINUTE TEXT: Defendants' motions are GRANTED. TRO is DISSOLVED.
Case is DISMISSED. Clerk shall close the case.
HEARING STATUS: Hearing Concluded
I watched two sections of Lin Wood video and just started the third. Either this guy is smoking the sofa, or he has info that should scare the crap out of us. I believe about one-half.
It was never going to happen. I watched on freerepublic here as people drank the Kool-Aid, felt bad for them actually. It was never going to happen.
He better act quick, he only has 4 days to get it done.
After that, I will welcome you back to reality
She is.
CANCELED
I am not privy to the timetable. I’m sure nobody knows better than Trump. My prediction is that nobody will be inaugurated on the 20th.
You guessed wrong. I am a lifelong conservative. The BS that some of these people are pushing will cause a loss of credibility.
When you make an accusation you better be 100% accurate. Or retract things when you have made mistakes. Conservatives cannot afford to lose face our actions and voice must be perfectly deployed.
Agreed.
The Kraken is sitting on the beach drinking rum and Coke’s .
The Kraken keeps repeating “and so it begins” and “bombshell” over and over.
Then laughing loudly.
Appreciate the explanation. But the defense has a slew of affidavits disputing the Republican observer affidavits. Their affidavits are all the same and state that they never saw any Republican observer denied access to anything. One admitted there was an observer who got closer than 6 feet and had to be moved back.
If they can respond to the alleged blocking of adequate observation (see Republican affidavits) then they can respond to whatever they want.
There is mountains of evidence. Trump’s attorneys have talked about it, but GOP controlled state legislatures didn’t want to act
Where is it? Yes, they’ve talked about it, but where is it? Have you personally reviewed it?
“but GOP controlled state legislatures didn’t want to act”
And every case would travel up to SCOTUS. We already know they’ve sold their souls to the devil so there’s really no hope for fair elections, or even basic justice, in America any more. We just have to learn to embrace the suck.
I love the confidence. Right or wrong, I wish more people had that type of confidence. Be blessed.
I was wrong!
I no longer think that. What I now believe instead is that a) Wood is your typical con, a charlatan, making money off a group of people he’s aware he can manipulate; and b) Powell was a legitimate helper but she got manipulated by the deep state with silly disruptive and distracting theories. Kind of similar to how Q is fed all sorts of disinformation by the deep state.
Now, why would the Left pull such PsyOps?
Simple.
So that the focus is not on simple straightforward points that could have achieved real traction (eg several key states simply did not follow laid-down procedure this election cycle) and instead focus on the bombastic and the exciting (gun fights in Germany between the CIA and Delta; Hugo Chavez; Italian hackers; Iranian involvement; endless affidavits the Left knew would never change an election; witnesses in front of State Legislatures like Melissa Carone who came off as stark crazy; Dominion machines being hacked; etc) that unfortunately were either nonexistent or next to impossible to prove even if they were true.
Time and resources were wasted on what must be one of the most focused PsyOps from the Left (since they took over schools and entertainment), and many people on our side fell for it hook line and sinker. Even NOW there are people on this very thread who don’t think Biden will be inaugurated tomorrow, that the National Guard in DC is there to arrest the Dems, and that there is still a ‘plan.’
I’ve seen the same belief patterns before.
In a cult!
People got lied to. Wood lied to people. Powell got lied to and was unknowingly used as a pawn to lie to people.
And by focusing on the ‘sensational but slippery way’ instead of the ‘boring but solid path’ President Trump lost, and when Biden is inaugurated tomorrow even those in denial will realize the Left pulled off the biggest heist ever (not including their takeover of education/the youth, entertainment/the zeitgeist and media/the voice). We have been witness to one of the biggest PsyOps move since De Beers made people believe diamonds are rare or the Allied forces invaded Normandy and made the Germans believe their plans were different until it was too late.
It saddens me, but I hope it’s a lesson we never forget!
Woods final comments were so crazy that he’s subject to never ending lawsuits. Unless he’s a plant. His role was to make Trump and his supporters look crazy.
It worked. The DS has the population convinced that Trump convinced his supporters to storm the Cap.
Woods is a paid actor, Powell more likely just a gullible Trump supporter that was approached by left wing hucksters
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.