Posted on 06/08/2020 1:33:54 PM PDT by ransomnote
(h/t HoneysuckleTN)
What? You mean Creepy Uncle Joe isn’t really up by 10 points?
Shocking.
Trump hired McLaughlin & Associates, to analyze biased media polling. Reed their report.
twitter ^ | June 8, 2020 | President Trump, , McLaughlin & Associates
Posted on 6/8/2020, 1:33:54 PM by ransomnote
Didn’t need any analysis. This was an obvious hit job poll that doesn’t even come close to reality.
I don’t know how to reed. . .
I think you mean “Reed THERE report.” /s
Fence sitters need the analysis. :)
What decent person is going to share their political opinions with a stranger on an unsolicited call? Imagine many republicans don’t answer or hang up on these callers. Pollsters are treated like spam.
I think you mean Reed THERE report. /s
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah, man. Yeah, I misspelled there, two. XD
Truck the polls, Truck an analysis. Mr. President, you don’t need me to say this, but I will anyway:
Now that it is OK to have mass protests and demonstrations, schedule a rally or twenty ASAP!!! Let’s show these a-hats what a really spontaneous uprising looks like.
MAGA!!!
“What decent person is going to share their political opinions with a stranger on an unsolicited call? Imagine many republicans dont answer or hang up on these callers. Pollsters are treated like spam”.
The above bears repeating as it is likely how most Trump voters feel about pollsters that call us.
If I bother to pick up the call at all as soon as they ID themselves as pollsters I hang up. I have no use for those people.
Winner ! with that last one. Is it a wonder peeps have trouble learning our language. .....so many words with the same sounds and different spellings, as well as many words with one spelling but 2 meanings. LOL
So CNN “poll”
Only 25% Republicans
And polled adults, not even registered voters let alone likely voters.
Way to go CNN
Chuckle.
I’ve been saying this so long that I no longer even bother to tear apart the internals of the polls, I just assume they use one or more of many established methods of rigging the headline results. Occasionally I check to confirm and it always remains true.
Well played!
Just heard Trump rallies starting up again!!! WooHoo!!!
Leading up to the 2016 election, I was fairly confident of a Trump victory. I just took the predictions of a Clinton landslide, down-adjusted for their consistent demographic biases and the rational silence of deplorables, but up-adjusted to account for the fraud vote. The pollsters seem to prefer to twist reality rather then just fabricating it from thin air.
I would prefer they wrote analytically rather than adversarial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.