Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cats Pajamas; ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; ..

I can’t “prove” anything with this. But my understanding is that when people/countries submit to The Plan, purple is used as a signal. It means that they are now protected by the Q team (and in danger from the Cabal). Q controls them. If they mess up, they lose their protection and the Cabal goes after them.

I thought HRC was owned, but I never thought about it being as far back as election night! (I assumed maybe Oct 2017, when Q 1st posted.) Thanks for bringing that up!!! I assumed the purple at the concession speech was some sort of “resistance” signal. IIRC, that was bandied about in the media. Of course that was all pre-Q, so the purple = submission idea was not yet floating around. And of course the MSM with their usual fake news would be “explaining” the odd purple color choice so that no one would question it. Also they were saying purple = red + blue and that the Dems were trying to unify both parties. That struck me as laughably absurd, but I definitely bought the “resistance” story. Hook, line, and sinker.

HRC submission at concession speech really makes a LOT of sense! Think about it. Everyone was confident that she’d win, HRC especially, since it was rigged. Then - shock! She loses. She doesn’t come out to give a speech all night. We’ve always assumed it was because she was plotting. But what if she was being shown the evidence against her and being told exactly what her options were? Submit or ? The evidence against her, the leverage against her, must have been incredibly damning. That would make for a long night! And no time for a concession speech. (I might go back and listen to her speech and Trump’s from that time for some clues!)

Is she protecting her grandchildren? Surely not Chelsea. CC is way too compromised would be my guess. It’s hard for me to imagine that HRC would protect anyone except for her own sorry butt. So I’m not really sure how this all fits the theory.

But it would be VERY INTERESTING to go back and look at all the politicians (and maybe celebrities) that were publicly wearing purple since Nov 8, 2016. And look at what they said then and what they’ve said since and how they’ve behaved since. Seeing them as pawns of Q, controlled in order to bring down the cabal might make some of their actions make more sense.

I think the Q team has most definitely been using some of the derps to take down the rest. HRC & NP are IMO playing roles. Did no name and GHWB refuse to play? Are one or both really still alive? IDK. I’m inclined to think both are dead, especially GHWB. But who knows? No Name was invisible for over 6 months before his “death”.


431 posted on 11/14/2019 7:06:29 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]


To: generally

since purple also represents justice....maybe its signaling she’s been brought to justice?


441 posted on 11/14/2019 7:47:19 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]

To: generally

HRC being shown evidence on election night?

I can definitely buy into that. IIRC, Trump delayed or was delayed in coming out for his victory speech. When coming to the podium, he said something like “...sorry, folks. Complicated business...”

So...perhaps the delay was immediately after Trump being declared the winner, he called HRC headquarters and told HRC directly ‘we have it all’: “Federal marshalls will be delivering a dossier to you within the next 30 minutes, and my Team will also be with them to review its details with you. Those details will also include listing of consequences if you do not comply. (And oh BTW...sucks to be you!)”


450 posted on 11/14/2019 8:09:29 AM PST by EMI_Guy ("You have to slow down to go fast." - Kenny Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]

To: generally

I would like to believe this, but Hitlery’s behavior and statements between the election and now belie this premise.


452 posted on 11/14/2019 8:15:23 AM PST by Bigg Red (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]

To: generally

Is she protecting her grandchildren? Surely not Chelsea. CC is way too compromised would be my guess. It’s hard for me to imagine that HRC would protect anyone except for her own sorry butt. So I’m not really sure how this all fits the theory.
````````````
She’s only protecting them if she wants to eat them later.


603 posted on 11/14/2019 2:08:33 PM PST by smileyface (I LOVE POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]

To: generally; Bigg Red; smileyface

HRC will never relinquish or step down anymore than would the devil himself. She has sold her soul. (There is no appropriate interpretability to that, no actual caveats, no substantive nuance, only emphemerous feints and deceptions in what people imagine they detect.)

Signals are being bandied about but don’t kid yourselves, codes can have different meanings to both sides, unless you have the key code it is open to interpretation and misinterpretation.


814 posted on 11/15/2019 3:10:45 AM PST by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson