Posted on 07/15/2019 4:24:17 PM PDT by ransomnote
A MUST READ: A Financial Review of Jeffrey Epsteins Ties to the Suspicious Wexner Foundation
Jeffrey Epstein is connected with the Clintons and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as well as numerous other politicians and celebrities. The Foundation that he is connected to has just as many questionable characters.
We reported over the weekend that Jeffrey Epstein has connections to an entity by the name of the Wexner Foundation (EIN #:27-7320631).
An Internet sleuth provided us some questionable ties related to Epstein and Barak Ehud. For the past 15 years there are numerous entities operating in both Ohio and NY related to the Wexner Foundation. The ties to Epstein seem to be limited to the early years and fairly straight forward.
Some claim the tunnels run for 100’s if not 1,000’s of miles in almost all directions. How would your suggestion work, if that’s true?
Very interesting and thanks!
No, that's civil disobedience. Civil rights and antiwar demonstrators did that all the time, both encouraging people to do it and actually doing it. That is subject to criminal penalties, but it's not sedition or insurrection.
If Pelosi calls for armed resistance -- and that armed resistance to law enforcement actually happens -- then we're talking about insurrection.
What about various Dem mayors (and maybe other people) who instruct cops to not comply with ICE as it goes about its duty to deport and/or incarcerate illegals? What crime are the Dem mayors etc committing?
No crime. Federal law enforcement officers cannot compel obedience from state, county or local authorities unless so ordered by a court -- or unless the President invokes the Insurrection Act of 1807. That's a big step, and it would be accompanied by federalizing the state's National Guard and handing such duties over to them.
What crime is it to instruct and advise illegals who are in violation of LE to resist and continue to violate law?
Obstruction of justice.
Judge in Michae Flynn case orders Flynn's former counsel to appear because the new counsel has represented that the former counsel has not produced the entire case file. Judge invites Senior Legal Ethics Counsel for the District of Columbia Bar to hearing. August 27 11 am.— Ivan Pentchoukov (@IvanPentchoukov) July 16, 2019
Direct quote from judge's order. Full text: https://t.co/IiEhE8lM2h pic.twitter.com/KLX7AoA25f— Ivan Pentchoukov (@IvanPentchoukov) July 17, 2019
Significant?— Hyperion (@hyperion5182) July 16, 2019
The fricking judge is asking the SENIOR LEGAL ETHICS COUNSEL for DC to be there for this hearing.
That is highly unusual so yes, it's significant.— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) July 16, 2019
What does this mean?— HeatherL13 (@13leatherhesnik) July 17, 2019
It means that Flynns previous attorneys have been caught obstructing his defense. Now why would they do that?— Lloyd (@gregfessenden) July 17, 2019
Former council omitted corrupt deals and threats made by special counsel?— Peace Through Strength🍀 (@52VikingConv) July 17, 2019
I'm a lawyer & I've never seen or heard of this happening before. Not ever.— Scott Berry (@ScottBerryAtty) July 16, 2019
I could never understand the Generals choice of law firms. I believe Eric Holder is currently a partner. Clintons 5th AG Chas Ruff was out of that viper pit too— Pete Za (@Pete62883136) July 16, 2019
Flynn must have had reasons. Hes an intel guy, had to be onto something. It cost him everything financially, either way.— TomB 🤷🏻♂️🤓or😎,☕️or🍷🇺🇸🇭🇷 (@TEbergie) July 17, 2019
Well i understood he knows where all the bodies are buried.and needs to be free from all gag orders. Which is what co-operating "forced" him to do. He was head spook. He knows what is happening.— Patriot (@BMassette) July 17, 2019
What does this mean?— HeatherL13 (@13leatherhesnik) July 17, 2019
It means that Flynns previous attorneys have been caught obstructing his defense. Now why would they do that?— Lloyd (@gregfessenden) July 17, 2019
This sets the table for overturning Flynn’s guilty plea and also sets the table for sanctions or disbarment.
Would this enable Gen. FLynn to also testify? Q said that Flynn gave 19 interviews already, to “other” agencies/etc.
This enables Flynn to file for dismissal of the charges.
Thanks for legal details.
Something seems wrong to me. In the law.
That’s good news.
Thanks, I should have just scrolled down a tad.
LJOA - a lot of Gen. Flynn news above!
> Do we know absolutely that JFK wanted to stop the cabal/DS?
Unknown as far as I’m concerned. JFK was not a saint by any means. Had an affair with a Russian agent, did drugs in the WH (as well as many women). Corrupt to the hilt.
-SB
info on
***SETH RICH***
from anons ....
http://lawflog.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019.07.15-Amended-complaint-61-1.pdf
A few things that stood out to me (below). FWIW keep in mind anons, this is an amended complaint submitted to the court by plaintiff’s counsel.
42. The DNC employee responsible for the leaks was Seth Rich, and he was assisted by his brother Aaron. Mr. Butowsky does not know exactly when the DNC figured out that Mr. Rich was the source of the leak. On July 10, 2016, however, Mr. Rich was fatally shot while walking home in Washington, D.C., and the murder has not been solved. Mr. Butowsky does not know whether the murder is related to Mr. Rich’s role in leaking DNC emails.
43. Shortly after the murder, the interim DNC chair at the time, Donna Brazile, reached out to Mr. McCabe and Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser for help in dealing with the political consequences of the murder. Ms. Brazile knew suspicions would soon arise, fairly or unfairly, that the murder was connected to the email leaks. D.C. police allowed the FBI to unlock Seth Rich’s electronic devices, and the FBI obtained data showing that Mr. Rich had indeed provided the DNC emails to Wikileaks. At Mr. McCabe’s direction, however, that information was kept secret with orders that it not be produced in response to any Freedom of Information Act request. For her part, Ms. Bowser directed D.C. police not to pursue any investigative avenues that might connect the murder to the email leaks. At her direction, local police blamed the murder on a botched robbery even though Mr. Rich’s watch, wallet, and other belongings were not removed from his body.
44. On July 22, 2016, Wikileaks began publishing thousands of email that had been downloaded from the DNC’s servers by Seth Rich and his brother, Aaron. Those emails showed how the campaign of Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton had corruptly taken control of the DNC for the purpose of sabotaging her primary opponent, Bernie Sanders. Per their game plan, the Clinton campaign and the DNC immediately claimed that the emails had been obtained by hackers working for the Russian government.
67. In an unprecedented act on August 9, 2016 on Dutch television station NOS, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange spoke specifically about Seth Rich: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, often very significant risks. Theres a 27-year-old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered, just two weeks ago, for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington... I am suggesting that our sources, ah, take risks and they, they become concerned to see things occurring like that...
But... a wealthy outsider.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3764549/posts
Police Have Neatly Labeled CDs of Blackmail Photos, with Names, from Epstein Mansion
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.