Skip to comments.Q Anon: 03/22/19 Trust Trump's Plan
Posted on 03/22/2019 12:47:30 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding mind control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of group-think), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ship) that provides the scattered (free thinkers) with a starter new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When non-dogmatic information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (group-think collective), and have free thought.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Thanks for the ping!
Obstruction could be set up bait from POTUS so these idiots will vote to begin impeachment proceedings and he can bring forth all his witnesses, evidence, NSA.,etc.,for discovery.
So if RM and RR can be grey or white hats is it possible JC is too and was in on his firing to make the sting believable to the cabal?
President appears to be toying with these dems.
comey’s strange behavior has made me wonder if he was in on it, too.
MADISON AND JEFFERSON, OR MARX AND ENGELS?
In America today, there are two warring concepts of government, one borne of the nations founding documents, and the other of The Communist Manifesto.
The one focuses on individual liberty, the other on income inequality.
In the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, Americans once proclaimed that rights are innate and individual, and that the government exists to safeguard those rights. In The Communist Manifesto, two German philosophers proclaimed that income inequality is the defining reality of society, and that government exists to eliminate it.
Both philosophies speak of rights, but one refers to liberties, and the other refers to entitlements guarantees of freedom as opposed to guarantees of income.
The very nature of these philosophies dictates differences in the size and scope of government. A government focused on protecting individual rights is small and self-limiting as reflected in the U.S. Constitution. A government focused on redistributing wealth is large and ever growing as reflected in the American government of today.
These distinctions are more than just classroom lessons taught to earlier generations of American students, they are the defining differences of our nations politics today. The choice between them is the crux of almost every election in our day. The philosophy of individual liberty is vestigially represented by the Republican Party, and the philosophy of income inequality is represented by the Democratic Party especially in the recent socialist surge represented by the Democrats newly elected to the House of Representatives and the Democrats running for president of the United States.
The candor and success of these socialist calls would have been hard to imagine in an early day. Not because we were less developed, but because we were more educated. The United States embraced public education in order to prepare its children to be citizens in a Republic. The belief was that operating and sustaining a freedom-based government required a populace that understood its political philosophy and its superiority over other systems.
But the schools from kindergarten to college were long since infiltrated and adulterated by those whose priority is to prepare children to be members of a collective, not citizens of a Republic. And so the simple, eternal benefits of our freedom-based government have not been taught or understood. In fact, just the opposite has been done. Instead of preaching American truth, the pulpits and professors have been teaching Marxist oppression.
And thats why approximate half of people under 35 say they want socialism. Its why the Democrat presidential candidates are staking out the positions they are. Its why a 29-year-old who was tending bar last year is the darling of the Democrats and the anathema of the Constitution.
And the future of the country depends on whether or not the American people understand the differences between the philosophies, and the importance of choosing individual liberty over government redistribution.
Freedom provides choice, and choice brings consequence, and in consequence is found a large measure of the disparity in the world. The only way to protect people from disparate consequence is to deny them personal choice, which is to enslave them. Government cannot protect you without enslaving you. It cant take away the consequences of your freedom without taking away your freedom.
And when the government seeks to protect you from all ills, including income inequality, it does so at the expense of your liberty.
The socialist idea, that government exists to eliminate economic disparity, demands that government be more powerful than personal choice. If you choose to obey the law and stay in school and pursue a professional education and budget your money and have a stable family unit, those choices are more likely to bring you to a more-prosperous economic outcome. If, on the other hand, you choose to break the law and drop out of school and not get a professional education and waste your money and do not have a stable family life, those choices are more likely to bring you to a less-prosperous economic outcome.
Is the resulting income inequality proof of societal oppression and economic injustice demanding governmental redistribution, or a result of individual choices which must be protected as a manifestation of individual liberty?
If individual liberty includes the right to own property, does the Marxist war against income inequality supersede that right and empower the government to confiscate that property? And when the government takes one persons money to give to another person at the point of a bayonet or under threat of criminal prosecution that is a confiscation, and it is the denial of the individual right to control your own property.
The two philosophies are mutually exclusive. They are at irreconcilable cross purposes. You cannot advance the one without damaging the other.
And a decades-long slide into socialism has significantly damaged Americas historic commitment to individual freedom. And the recent surge in patently socialist politicians and policies has made that obvious and of great import.
And soon America will choose.
Whether to follow Madison and Jefferson, or Marx and Engels.
Whether to re-embrace a Republic in which individual liberty is enthroned, or to succumb to a collective in which entitlement is paramount.
Whether to rise to our better lights, or to decay into a tribal society of envy and resentment, covetousness and greed, the government becoming the master and divider of an ever-shrinking national prosperity.
While the germ of American genius our proclamation that all mankind is equal, free and sovereign is thrown in the gutter outside the welfare office.
- by Bob Lonsberry © 2019
I have seen no predictions about the stock market tomorrow. I say it could go up 500 points at least. People be celebrating!
Nancy Pelosi has set the precedent: “You have to impeach him to see what the charges are.”
No joke, THAT is their plan.
Bagster doesn’t sleep - he is his own team, like Q. :-)
Unless he can time travel back and forth, that’s a possibility.....
These RATs still consider Pres. Trumps election as illegitimate.
fact check me, but iirc, I don’t think bubba was ever elected with a majority of the popular vote???
Re:Assange in caravan
Was that you or did you find that somewhere?
It continually amazes me how appallingly stupid the left is.
Letting in Assange who will destroy Fat Hillary and the DS ...
Hoisted on their own petard.
Not in 1992.
Hillary got more of the popular vote in her losing election, than Bubba got winning his first.
1) The Republicans haven't got balls or a spine and
2) The Smelly Old Hag lost an election that she bought and paid for and didn't get it done, just like Slick Willy couldn't do her, she couldn't do us!!!
That is as blunt as I can get on here!!!
Sorry, not buying his analysis.
This one refereeing to Ryan rings particularly false:
A known RINO making decisions about what to include on shows, assures Dems it’s fair?
Ryan is a known RINO according to us, but to the left he is a conservative. And I find it hard to believe that Ryan going to leave his RINO ways behind and tell the truth about the DS.
we’re just gunna stay out of your way, now
u are on a roll
43 freakin %, thanks to Perot.
Or in 1996 Bubba only got 49%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.