Q Anon: 03/13/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 03/13/19 | FReepers, vanity

[RitaOK]

“Trump Threatens SNL With Federal Investigation”

Per headline... the Drudgery Report..

[Disestablishmentarian]

RitaOK, it’s so nice to see you! I thought I was the only living soul in here FESTIVAL.

BTW, great post!

[fatima]

Obama’s Brother,PS,Hi Brown Deer,it all comes back doesn’t it.
More
Is Michelle Michael?
https://twitter.com/ObamaMalik/status/1106265760975020033

[RitaOK]

No Kidding! FESTIVAL is the new Nap Time, or on a brighter note.. early Spring Fever, Semester Break, or the Call of the Wild— (aka, “Lawn Work”) I guess.

Where is everyone? SHOW TIME has mostly become the popcorn event that we looked forward to, after having been so busy and invested (for so long) in The STORM.

Our own Q diggers and Anons must have, by now, built their own libraries full of Q recommendations for following new links, new bloggers, new media friends to seek for hourly news. Culture shock to slow down and watch ACT I.

Pass the popcorn.. %:D/

[Fred Nerks]

Isn't it amusing how the model Marcy Moore, who has deliberately been wrongly identified as Stanley Ann Dunham, is shown wearing the same earrings...

In an image published in Exotique Magazine which is dated 1958, when Stanley Ann Dunham was barely 16 years of age and still in high school...and had not set foot in Hawaii.

'Dreams From My Real Father' from that scumbag Joel Gilbert was simply nothing but a red herring to take the heat off what we were all saying... why is it that zero looks nothing like the coal black student from Kenya, and so much like the convert to islam, known as the 'Black Prince' - Malcolm Little/Shabazz.

[greeneyes]

Why are you yelling? You are pretty emotional about this one post.
My post:
“If you had an executive selling 50% of his holdings in a short time frame, that would be very revealing. 5%, not so much.”
Your reply:
“HOW ABOUT SELLING 99% OF YOUR STOCK IN A 3YR PERIOD??? WOULD YOU CONSIDER THAT REVEALING???”
Isn’t what you said consistent with what I said? I wasn’t replying to a post that showed FB stats over a 3 year period. The stats you cite later ARE indicative of a large program where insiders are dumping a lot of their FB stock. That is exactly the kind of data I would want to know before I drew any conclusions from it. Not the snapshot of smaller sales that I was commenting on.
I’ve not seen you so worked up before. I hope you’re feeling better today.
***********************************************************************************************

Sorry, but I was not yelling. That was a HEADLINE. For future reference, I am a tech - tard. I don’t know how to write in colors, bold, or italics, so I use Capital letters.

I rarely yell, and if I do, it’ll be noted that it’s a yell.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
NEXT IS MY ACTUAL COMPLETE REPLY TO YOUR POST(not a yell-transition):

HOW ABOUT SELLING 99% OF YOUR STOCK IN A 3YR PERIOD??? WOULD YOU CONSIDER THAT REVEALING???

It is possible that the real thing to notice on the link wrt Q drop is the summary of the last 12 months compared to others. Click the link below, and go to that section. Last year was the big drain.

What would be most definitive would be to see what each individual has been doing over the last 12-18 months.

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fb/insideractions (END OF MY ORIGINAL POST)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Please note the first paragraph under the headlines. Where I am attempting to direct your attention to the market watch page that Q linked,(click the link to see it) and that Big Bobb copied and posted to begin with.( http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3734405/posts?page=700#700)(http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3734405/posts?page=707#707)

Clearly on the right hand side, under the title TRANSACTION SUMMARY, is information that is more relevant than the left hand graph side. It shows the 3,6,and 12 month activity.

12 months was 1,571 sales @ $45.7Million
6 months was only 159 sales @$3.8Million-still more than usual

To me that indicated a big dump somewhere, and so I did a search and provided a link to the story about ZuckerPucker.

So bottom line, I was trying to get you to focus on the right hand side of that FB Stat that you were replying to, which was quite revealing, and did show unusual activity over 12 months, instead of downplaying the relevance.

Trying to expand your view to the whole picture on that link and not just the one you kept posting about. End of Story.

#HopeThatsClear
#NoYellingEverWithoutLabel
#ForestVsTrees

[Defiant]

That’s a laugh. I was investigating Obama since 2007. Right here. Just as we did with Clinton on FR’s bulletin board and the first Drudge-linked web site. I read everything, came to some conclusions. We were looking into the trip to Pakistan, his boyhood in Indonesia, the homosexuality and Larry Sinclair and the dead guys in Chicago, who wrote his book, and where he was born, among many other things. All back in 2007. Some people got into that subject and went off the deep end. You might be in that last category. I don’t know and I don’t care.

Whatever you think you found is tainted by your personality. It’s ugly. Those who scream the loudest about how what THEY know is the truth are usually whack jobs. I think you qualify.

[Defiant]

So I got a wall of words because you wanted me to dig further into FB stock selling? Why didn’t you just say that? I said what Q posted would not be consequential without more data and you apparently AGREE and went and dug the data. Good work!

[greeneyes]

Wall was mostly copies of the original posts and links.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“you wanted me to dig further into FB stock selling? Why didn’t you just say that? “

No I wanted you to look at the rest of the page that Q posted - the most Relevant part IMO.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“I said what Q posted would not be consequential without more data”

Clearly the Transaction Summary indicated unusually large sales over the 12 month period-plainly on the page Q linked. Click it and see-on the right under TRANSACTION SUMMARY.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fb/insideractions
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“you apparently AGREE and went and dug the data.”

Nope I did not agree. I was curious to know WHO dumped stock.
There was already sufficient data to know that unusually high volume of sales had happened over the 12 months as clearly shown on that page.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Good work!”
Thanks. LOL

[Defiant]

Whatevs. You really shouldn’t be wasting your time on proving how perfect your prior post was. You have talent that can be used better elsewhere.

[greeneyes]

Whatevs. You really shouldn’t be wasting your time on proving how perfect your prior post was. You have talent that can be used better elsewhere.
******************************************************************************************
LOL. You should take you own advice. Q was right!

drop 3066
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/technology/facebook-chris-cox.html
Sometimes the TRUTH is right in front of you.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fb/insideractions
Q

[DainBramage]

Your talent is being wrong half the time then insulting the people who prove you wrong. Were I you I would lay low and not show people that they are actually correct ..you’re an arrogant ass..

[greeneyes]

LOL.

[grey_whiskers]

Thank you!

[Ros42]

Hi bitt
Sorry just saw your welcome:-)
Thank you...however I’ve followed Q from beginning. I just read...and read! Lol
You guys doing all the research get big kudos and have done an outstanding job! Thank you..it makes red pilling people so much easier:)

[Defiant]

I just noticed that you were continuing your jihad on your Obama parentage slide.It was in a prior thread, so I hadn’t read it until I checked lower on my new replies. I had thought we were past it. My view of the whole discussion was expressed very well here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3735874/posts?page=1736#1736

Hope you’re enjoying the Meuller Report. Big things are yet to come. Someday, maybe even the truth about Obama.

[greeneyes]

I just noticed that you were continuing your jihad on your Obama parentage slide.It was in a prior thread, so I hadn’t read it until I checked lower on my new replies. I had thought we were past it. My view of the whole discussion was expressed very well here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3735874/posts?page=1736#1736
Hope you’re enjoying the Meuller Report. Big things are yet to come. Someday, maybe even the truth about Obama.
*********************************************************************************************
Defiant, I don’t know what the heck you are blabbering about. I have not participated in jihad on Obama parentage. In fact I have tried mightily to avoid such since about 2007.