Wall was mostly copies of the original posts and links.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“you wanted me to dig further into FB stock selling? Why didn’t you just say that? “
No I wanted you to look at the rest of the page that Q posted - the most Relevant part IMO.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“I said what Q posted would not be consequential without more data”
Clearly the Transaction Summary indicated unusually large sales over the 12 month period-plainly on the page Q linked. Click it and see-on the right under TRANSACTION SUMMARY.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/fb/insideractions
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“you apparently AGREE and went and dug the data.”
Nope I did not agree. I was curious to know WHO dumped stock.
There was already sufficient data to know that unusually high volume of sales had happened over the 12 months as clearly shown on that page.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Good work!”
Thanks. LOL
Whatevs. You really shouldn’t be wasting your time on proving how perfect your prior post was. You have talent that can be used better elsewhere.