Q Anon: 02/24/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 02/24/19 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	Where We Go 1 We Go All	Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration. - 6 min
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Table	tang-soo et. al.	Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube	Storm Is Upon Us	Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube	Dan Duval	Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread	Qmap.pub	QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
The Oracle	Bagster	The Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Table	FReeQs	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
Post	FReeQs	Technical Tips -Learn how to meme, post graphics, code HTML
	“Power to the People”
Twitter	Sara Carter	Fox News National Security/War Correspondent sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	John Solomon	Award winning investigative journalist sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	Praying Medic	Q-drop reactions. Also, YouTube, Vimeo, Podbean.com and ITunes
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Website	Saul Montes-Bradley	Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
YouTube	X22 Report	Investigative Q-drop reactions
YouTube	In Pursuit of Truth	Brisk, lively drop analysis. Also on Gab.Ai
Twitter	Lisa Mei Crowley	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
Thread	Jim Robinson	Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
	“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Phil...you made a major breach of de-trolling protocol.
Never have the trolls handle in the TO: line.
That way they don’t get paid for it.

[bitt]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/feb/25/supreme-court-dead-judges-cant-issue-rulings/

Supreme Court: Dead judges can’t issue rulings

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Damn!
Givin’ away de-trolling strateegery.

[bagster]

The ‘c’ is one down and to the right.

That can't be right. There were WAY more than six of those there.

Dude, it was the Oscars.

[outofsalt]

"Because Judge Reinhardt was no longer a judge at the time when the en banc decision in this case was filed, the Ninth Circuit erred in counting him as a member of the majority. That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. But federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity."

RBG is sad.

The grants of certiori are limited. (most of the list were denied)

[Defiant]

That is an interesting tidbit.

[MNDude]

The timing of this ruling seems to be too much of a coincidence.

[bitt]

Thanks! Actually I peeked but one suggestion was so ~~~ I didn’t post it... eeew..

[KitJ]

Why “Dubai”?

Vacation destination for the global hoi polloi where money can get you anything.

And there’s LOTS of money there.

Kind of like the “Rich Kids” channels on social media.

q.v. human trafficking, drug smuggling, sex crimes, etc. etc. etc.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

“statistically speaking”
After party?
Before party?
Party party?
Rape rape?

[philman_36]

Ah...yep. The intention was there. I meant for it to go to BiggBob's reply and blew it.

Long night, as you know.

[BiggBob]

Trump departs Andrews for Hanoi summit

https://youtu.be/t4uu68LlUl8

[bagster]

After party?
Before party?
Party party?
Rape rape?

Pants Party?

[bitt]

https://www.philly.com/news/nation-world/supreme-court-ruling-judge-decision-after-death-20190225.html

High court: court can’t count vote of deceased judge

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://fortune.com/2019/02/25/dead-judge-supreme-court-ruling/

‘Appointed for Life, Not for Eternity.’ Dead Judge’s Vote Shouldn’t Have Counted, Supreme Court Rules

[KitJ]

I did a short dive into the history of the poster. It's mucky in there. Very, very negative and condescending on almost every comment.OkD has some very serious problems with bitterness and insecurity. Maybe someone will throw a prayer his way?

Here's one. I'm done digging in that septic tank.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: Pants party? ::

My pants are tight!

[Califreak]

Fish slappers!

[bitt]

re: USSC decision - (I have no idea what’s going on..)

could this be an attempt to void any en banc decision that was filed after Judge Scalia’s death?

(I have no legal knowledge..but I look for derpishness in everything now...)

[Chuckster]

That episode with #2 would have ended a lot sooner if folks here could resist chumming the water and encouraging him.

[Defiant]

Love this line from the opinion:

“federal judges are appointed for life, not for eternity.”.

It is also interesting that they issue this at the current time, while Ginsberg’s status is in doubt. The opinion was “by the court” which means no one puts their name to it, the whole court issues it. Sotomayor concurred, no one else had a separate concurrence or dissent, meaning it was unanimous.

I didn’t see an indication in the opinion what they are doing with all the opinions that involved Reinhardt. This opinion only involved one case.