Q Anon: 02/15/19 Trust Trump's Plan

eldoradude to TEXOKIE
I appreciate your detailed and well-sauced posts - some of us like to read for ourselves. ;)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:-D
I appreciate that so much, eldoradude. However I do understand the inconvenience a long post can cause for certain reader circumstances.

721 posted on 02/17/2019 12:28:06 PM PST by TEXOKIE

spokeshave posted Obie Wan Kenobe meme:

“Not the Collusion you were looking for”

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

ROFL! THAT’S GREAT!!

722 posted on 02/17/2019 12:30:32 PM PST by TEXOKIE

723 posted on 02/17/2019 12:32:07 PM PST by Enigo54 (Hank Reardon was right)

To: stars & stripes forever

724 posted on 02/17/2019 12:32:26 PM PST by TEXOKIE

725 posted on 02/17/2019 12:33:16 PM PST by Enigo54 (Hank Reardon was right)

Ignore the trolls and naysayers. Be not afraid!
This is our time!!!

726 posted on 02/17/2019 12:33:41 PM PST by USMC79to83

727 posted on 02/17/2019 12:35:15 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion

Thanks. I’ve been wondering about that myself for some time.

728 posted on 02/17/2019 12:36:19 PM PST by mkmensinger

729 posted on 02/17/2019 12:37:34 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)

To: Enigo54; BiggBob; Disestablishmentarian

“””Good job wrangling all of these and getting them here!””

Because YOU shared that html editor with us. Thank-you. Still need to get used to and fine tune it though.

https://html5-editor.net/

Had to take time to kill the TFC links. All images are clickable to enlarge, I think.

Once I got in the groove I churned and burned. My apologies to all if I stepped on you during that time. I looked but could have missed you.

I was looking for the P-shift key after the second drop, but I hung in there. ;)

730 posted on 02/17/2019 12:38:49 PM PST by haffast (Alternate universes held together by porridge.)

WHITAKER is indeed staying with the DOJ, as Q said he would.

731 posted on 02/17/2019 12:40:23 PM PST by Enigo54 (Hank Reardon was right)

Just because one HAS a tool, does not mean they can USE the tool. And YOU can absolutely USE that tool! All credit to you!

732 posted on 02/17/2019 12:44:32 PM PST by Enigo54 (Hank Reardon was right)

I read somewhere that the POTUS has till 7:59 A.M. Tuesday, February 19 to sign it. cannot recall where I read it.
Found this.

Trump signs 2019 spending bill, federal pay raise into law

Then it says in an update....
Updated 12 p.m. Feb. 15, 2019

President Donald Trump said he will sign a multi-billion-dollar spending package into law Friday morning, the final step needed to avoid another government shutdown by the end of the week.

With the president’s signature, federal employees have a secured an average 1.9 percent pay raise for the rest of the year. The spending package also finalizes funding for all of government through Sept. 30, the rest of fiscal 2019.

Does not say he signed it.
https://federalnewsnetwork.com/pay-benefits/2019/02/trump-to-sign-2019-spending-bill-federal-pay-raise-into-law/

733 posted on 02/17/2019 12:46:02 PM PST by sweetiepiezer (Winning is not getting old.)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-joint-resolution/31/actions

Still at “To President”.

Mystery.... WH statments on Feb.15 say he signed it. But holding onto it? Site slow to update? Hmm?

734 posted on 02/17/2019 12:47:26 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)

735 posted on 02/17/2019 12:49:13 PM PST by blu (WWG1WGA)

To: TEXOKIE; KMG365; blu; bagster

KMG365: I agree with Bagster. When I see one of your lengthy posts, I think good lord nobody has time to read all of that. As I am scrolling down and see a super long post I know what name I am going to see at the bottom of it.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

TEXOKIE: I agree with him too! LOL!
I am sorry about the length. Believe it or not I really do try to streamline. I am not offended by people scrolling by because I am posting the detailed content in large part for documentation.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

MotherOfDragons:
I think some want more detail and some want less because we are fortunate enough to have both analysts and researchers on our threads; the two disciplines draw on separate skill sets.

I received the same input at TexOkie when I started posting threads because I am literally interested in soaking in information.

I could never be a freelance writer submitting articles to The Oracle because I lack the gifts that job requires. Bagster naturally streamlines all our input into clear strands of thought - it ain’t in me to do that. And the Oracle HAS let me know (polite pm) at times that I sometimes write more than...ahem...necessary (I yam what I yam). Because bagster’s gifts center on his ability to distill chaos into clear streams of thought, I can see what he would not be interested in my more verbose writing style (chaos). And lately, I’ve seen the lights on high up in The Oracle pressroom 24/7 as the staff attempts the impossible (keep up with Q despite lack of food, water, sleep, fresh air etc.) so I can understand him looking for ways to economize on his time.

*off in the distance, the sound of bagster scrolling past the rest of my post*

With input like bagster’s and others, I began to curtail the level of detail in my thread maintenance posts (which are different from research info) and try to strike a balance.

When I was first wandering the Forbidden City, I went over to a back room to watch Anons piecing together information. I was appalled to find they were doing so at the molecular level. I backed outta the room and tip toed away - I’d rather wait for analysts to tell me what the millions of teeny little data points they were assembling mean. So apparently even I have my limits.

I think it’s preferences and I’m grateful that it all comes together in our threads. The scroll bar works for some, and others (me) are interested in details. No need to change. For awhile, I tried to remember to put a one or two line summary at the top of my posts so scrollers would know what I was going on about - but it does take time and we all want more time to Q it up! :)

Texokie, I can’t imagine our threads without your research contributions, and that’s a fact!

*looks up at the wall of text I wrote*

Well, what’d I tell ya.......

736 posted on 02/17/2019 12:50:23 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

I know...I was thinking he takes RRs place....

737 posted on 02/17/2019 12:51:34 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)

To: sweetiepiezer

Q post 2747.

That settles the question.

-SB

738 posted on 02/17/2019 12:51:37 PM PST by Snowybear

Ahhhhhhhh my slow moving brain missed that! THAT would be TOTALLY Cool!

739 posted on 02/17/2019 12:56:55 PM PST by Enigo54 (Hank Reardon was right)

To: ransomnote; bagster

geeze louise....it happened again....

I went out to remove the global warming on my drive way.
I get back and check out the thread, then see bagster’s head explode just because. so i meander over the the “Q” place and holy carp !

see ya when u see ya....

740 posted on 02/17/2019 12:58:15 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794