Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 01/07/19 Trust Trump's Plan
qmap.pub ^ | 01/07/19 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 01/07/2019 10:54:23 PM PST by ransomnote

“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Archive tang-soo et. al. Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube Storm Is Upon Us Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube Dan Duval Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Twitter Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread Qmap.pub QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table FReeQs Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
Twitter Sara Carter Fox News National Security/War Correspondent sometimes cited by Q
Twitter Praying Medic Q-drop reactions. Also, YouTube, Vimeo, Podbean.com and ITunes
YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Website Saul Montes-Bradley Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
YouTube X22 Report Investigative Q-drop reactions
YouTube In Pursuit of Truth Brisk, lively drop analysis. Also on Gab.Ai
Twitter Lisa Mei Crowley Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
“Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Thread Little Jeremiah Memes
Thread Jim Robinson Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: disinformation; larp; maga; mmorpg; q; qanon; sessionswasfired; trump; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 2,101-2,117 next last
To: ransomnote
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein is expected to leave his role in the coming weeks, multiple sources familiar with his plans told ABC News.

Hey guys, remember this one? It's another "FUTURE PROVES PAST" moment.

(old Q post)

#2654

POTUS Says Appointing Acting Cabinet Heads Grants "More Flexibility"

https://www.axios.com/trump-acting-cabinet-heads-more-flexibility-d708dcb6-967b-42ba-97dc-9b1cf1d30aaf.html
Scaramucci model?
Public opinion (optics) do not matter.
Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted.
Q

Bagster theory:

Using the "SCARAMUCCI MODEL", Acting Attorney General Whitaker was placed for the reasons that Q posted above, and his mission (one of them, but an important one) was to make [RR] an offer he couldn't refuse. Hence, his going quietly into that good night (for now).

This is a knife in the heart to the "nothing's happening" crowd.

All good things come to those who wait.


921 posted on 01/09/2019 3:03:47 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Thank you.


922 posted on 01/09/2019 3:07:38 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
From that article, I think the Deep State wants to get the (protest) party started since Trump “cheated them” out of riots when he exposed the Dems re the wall instead of declaring national emergency in a (their) “timely” manner. Here’s what I think is the DS hint.

“During his March 2017 confirmation hearing to become deputy attorney general, Rosenstein told Senators he would “certainly” resign his post if he felt he was being inappropriately pressured to influence an investigation.”

~~~~~~~

I came across a WP article from Jan 3 saying that Trump is "rolling back" civil rights law and, I question the timing.

Trump administration considers rollback of anti-discrimination rules

I think maybe the DS is having a hard time getting Soros sized protests and may be trying to roll up a variety of interst groups into one big protest. Sounds paranoid, I know, but then I just "happen" to find this comment on the article and I think it's agitation supporting my theory:

Comment on article by rlb57
"Yesterday he claimed to have the power to declare a national emergency to build his wall. Next he wants to roll back Civil Rights. Trump will not be satisfied until there is nationwide rioting in the streets.

Who will be the first to stand up and say Trump is a Clear and Present Danger to our nation, to our Constitution?"

923 posted on 01/09/2019 3:22:39 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 920 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

924 posted on 01/09/2019 3:37:42 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
I think maybe the DS is having a hard time getting Soros sized protests and may be trying to roll up a variety of interst groups into one big protest.

The University derps call that "intersectionality".

Bagster


925 posted on 01/09/2019 3:39:13 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies]

To: generally

chuck and nancy rebuttal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYLAWl6XhOI


926 posted on 01/09/2019 3:44:19 AM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: bagster
Knowledge can be gained from all sources. Hell, I read your stuff.

Available at stores everywhere


927 posted on 01/09/2019 4:07:07 AM PST by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: bagster

The University derps call that “intersectionality”.

____________________________________

So the Deep State thinks Trump is about to declare a National Security Emergency and wants to leverage such a declaration into protests/riots. But will that be enough?

They decided to “prime the pump” by releasing the WP story suggesting that POTUS is attacking civil rights and then wait to fan the flames when he declares a national emergency. Nancy and Chucky show up dressed in their riot-inciting best. But DARN! POTUS doesn’t declare! In fact, he chips away at their base by focusing on humanitarian crisis they created! They did NOT have speeches prepared for that. And they’re afraid what’s going to happen to them if they can’t get a riot going ASAP (tick tock).

Now what? Launch Plan B. The 4 am article (literally the release time - so it was already “tee-d up” for the green light) by ABC “news” detailing a rumor that Rosenstein is leaving should get the riots going, they hope. That “rumor” doesn’t have to be true, it just has to provide sufficient “fear” to provoke protests/riots. If it doesn’t happen that RR leaves, they can claim their protesting/rioting stopped POTUS in his tracks (i.e., stopped him from forcing RR out).

Sadly, I believe that the DS deems such protests “necessary” to collect people into soft target zones. Hire Antifa or MS13 or other henchmen to attack the “peaceful protesters” and make the false optics look like POTUS is suppressing civil rights protests.

In providing false flag events blamed on POTUS, the DS might hope to chip away at Trump’s base (e.g., “Yeah so you’re conservative, but you object to Macron abusing yellow vest protesters so you’ll object attacks on protesters we’ll blame on POTUS, right? Right?” If true, I grimly suppose that such false flags would be designed to be severe/graphic.

So my tin foil slants in the direction of a battle for the base going on- with Trump addressing alot of walk-away Dems and fence sitters, and the DS trying to reach Trump supporters with false portrayals of Macron-like (yellow vest) protester suppression.


928 posted on 01/09/2019 4:07:24 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes; smileyface
These Central American countries are all Clown Ops?
*************************************************************************

Clowns have routinely caused regime change in the Americas south of Mexico. Books have been written about it.

If you believe that the clowns are profiting from running drugs, it's not a large step to understand the clowns are knee-deep in Central America's capitals.

929 posted on 01/09/2019 4:19:31 AM PST by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies]

To: USMC79to83

If you believe that the clowns are profiting from running drugs, it’s not a large step to understand the clowns are knee-deep in Central America’s capitals.
**************************************************************************
Yep drugs, guns, and whatever else to make a buck and stay in control.


930 posted on 01/09/2019 4:33:00 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Comment on article by rlb57
“Yesterday he claimed to have the power to declare a national emergency to build his wall. Next he wants to roll back Civil Rights. Trump will not be satisfied until there is nationwide rioting in the streets.

Who will be the first to stand up and say Trump is a Clear and Present Danger to our nation, to our Constitution?”
___________________________________

Okay, I never knew “clear and present danger” was a legal term (Mirriam-Webster online source).

“What is the meaning of clear and Present Danger?
legal Definition of clear and present danger. : a risk or threat to safety or other public interests that is serious and imminent; especially. : one that justifies limitation of a right (as freedom of speech or press) by the legislative or executive branch of government. a clear and present danger of harm to others or himself.”

~~~~
MoD so maybe the goal is to agitate for impeachment instead of false flag? One can hope....


931 posted on 01/09/2019 4:33:17 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Ann Coulter tweeted: If Trump’s wall proposal is self-evidently absurd, why has the entire MSM spent every moment for the past 3 weeks making (false) arguments against it? Call congress: 202 224 3121


932 posted on 01/09/2019 4:41:26 AM PST by Melian (Check yourself before you kek yourself. ~ Melian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 930 | View Replies]

To: bitt

What is RV?


933 posted on 01/09/2019 4:41:47 AM PST by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: generally

Chuckie looked tired and drained-like a vampire victim.

SanFranNan looked drugged and wide eyed. I’m not sure I would call their demeanor scared, but I haven’t quite nailed what I would call it.

Clearly they expect their low info voters to just accept as Gospel what they have to say-and given that the mockingbirds are also reporting that DJT is telling lies about the border, that expectation will be fulfilled.


934 posted on 01/09/2019 4:42:41 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: bagster

I like the IPOT (In Pursuit Of Truth) Youtube channel. He enlivens his interesting Q videos with pop culture snippets and humor. We spend so much time reading politics and serious content - sometimes I really need the (fun) break.

I see that IPOT recently created a group of little 2-minute “Quick Burn” videos. I’ll put one below. This little Quick Burn contains footage of a snowflake shrieking interspersed with reaction clips. The second burn in this video is Kellyann Conway mopping the floor with Acosta, intersperesed with reaction clips taken from pop culture. 

A Quick Burn - Hate Speech - IPOT Presents - 1.9.19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG2OVC8KzVk

NOTE: The In Pursuit Of Truth YOUTUBE channel is also linked in our Thread Table. :)

Here’s IPOT’s YOUTUBE channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAyrKoW31y5UcsRjh2ItvxQ/videos


935 posted on 01/09/2019 4:44:03 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies]

To: kallisti

To: greeneyes
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3718372/posts?page=3#3

752 posted on 01/08/2019 6:55:48 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

To: greeneyes
Thanks for the bourbon spew. I so stole it.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

You are welcome. KEK.


936 posted on 01/09/2019 4:46:26 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Calling your legislator: A step-by-step guide

Call congressional offices directly or through the switchboard. If you do not have the direct number, you can reach US representatives by calling 202-225-3121, and US senators by calling 202-224-3121. Ask the operator to connect you to the individual office. If you do not know the names of your members of Congress or want the direct line to their office, you can find your senators here and your representative here.

https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Or house.gov

Ask to speak to the aide who handles the issue about which you are calling. Your call will be more influential if you speak to the correct aide. However, Congressional aides are very busy and this is not always possible. If you cannot speak directly with the aide, leave a message with the receptionist stating your views.

Let them know that you are a constituent. Elected officials are most interested in your opinions if you are their constituent, so be sure to say the city and state you are from.

Know your facts. Be sure you have the basic information about your topic in front of you when you call. You should be able to specifically describe the topic about which you are calling and state your opinion on what your legislator should do.

Note your expertise. If you have professional experience on the issue on which you are calling, be sure to mention it. It will help to establish your credibility on the issue and may event prompt the aide to ask you for some guidance on the issue.

Be brief. Aides receive a high volume of phone calls every day, so keep your call short.

Be timely. Timeliness is especially important when you are phoning. If the vote on your issue is imminent, the aide is much more likely to pay attention to what you say.

Consider calling the local office. Calling the office in your district or state, rather than the Washington office, can sometimes be very effective. If you are calling about a vote or other timely issues, always call the Washington office. But, if you are calling generally about an issue that affects your district or community, calling the local office can be a good way to make them aware of an issue.


937 posted on 01/09/2019 4:48:59 AM PST by Melian (Check yourself before you kek yourself. ~ Melian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies]

To: haffast

As I posted earlier I don’t remember a “rebuttal” to any Presidential speech except for a State of the Union. I find it shocking and disrespectful. If any Congress critter had done that to Obama they would not have survived. If anyone knows of another such rebuttal please let me know. It might ease my disgust and anger.


938 posted on 01/09/2019 4:49:16 AM PST by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies]

To: All

Hmmm

Rosenstein wants to ensure a smooth transition for incoming Attorney General nominee Bill Barr and plans to transition out of the job in the coming weeks, the sources said.

Rosenstein long thought of his role as a two-year position and the two-year mark is coming soon, officials close to the departing attorney general told Fox News.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/report-deputy-ag-rod-rosenstein-to-leave-doj-once-new-attorney-general-confirmed


939 posted on 01/09/2019 4:53:16 AM PST by StormFlag (May the Light shine and darkness remove, MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 934 | View Replies]

To: USMC79to83
Schancy. Resting troll face.
940 posted on 01/09/2019 4:56:03 AM PST by Melian (Check yourself before you kek yourself. ~ Melian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 2,101-2,117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson