Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gillibrand’s own sons have no place in her ‘future’
NY Post ^ | 6 Dec, 2018 | Karol Markowicz

Posted on 12/09/2018 1:47:48 PM PST by MtnClimber

“The future is female.” It’s a favorite slogan of the identity left that has now gone mainstream. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand tweeted it on Wednesday, adding that the future is also “intersectional” and “powered by our belief in one another.”

But if the future is female, what happens to our boys? And what message are we sending our present-day girls? Gillibrand is one of about 30 Democrats considering running for president in 2020, and the tweet suggests she’s seizing some strategic left-wing ground (in a primary field crowded with lefties) by appealing to the Dems’ identity-obsessed base.

Her mentioning “intersectionality” is a nod to that base. Born in the ivory tower, intersectionality is a theory that various forms of oppression overlap and compound the suffering of minority groups. Thus, a woman might be oppressed; but a black woman is more oppressed; a black, gay woman even more so; and a black, gay, disabled woman is the most oppressed of all.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: genderdysphoria; globalwarminghoax; homosexualagenda; intersectionality; karolmarkowicz; kirstengillibrand; marxism; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkpost; oppression
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2018 1:47:48 PM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The Marxist belief that there are only oppressors and oppressed. Intersectionality is the Marxist belief that oppression can come from many causes. Remember that the communist regimes took successful business people and shot them or worked them to death in the gulags. This Gillibrand is heavy with the Marxist talk.


2 posted on 12/09/2018 1:53:06 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The original “F” Bomb “Mom” in a pussyhat and vagina costume. Her kids can be proud.


3 posted on 12/09/2018 1:53:24 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Sounds like Adam Schiff would be happy to take them in and “show them the ropes”...


4 posted on 12/09/2018 1:56:36 PM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Schumer’s handmaiden and fuffler!


5 posted on 12/09/2018 1:58:02 PM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The future, like always, is upper body strength. Two words should strike fear into these addled, would be tyrannical weaker sexists. Those two words are: one punch.

Make love not war, gals.


6 posted on 12/09/2018 1:58:34 PM PST by coaster123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

>>a black, gay, disabled woman is the most oppressed of all.

Make it a a black, gay, disabled, Muslim woman for the intersectionality intergalactic champion!

But wait! What if she’s transgender!? And if . . .

It never ends.


7 posted on 12/09/2018 1:59:26 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Assumes that the boys would want anything to do with her...


8 posted on 12/09/2018 2:01:49 PM PST by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

But if the black, gay, disabled, Muslim transgender woman is a conservative, she’s one of the deplorables, and merits only scorn and no benefits.


9 posted on 12/09/2018 2:02:05 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

To be a woman and gay and Muslim means you are likely to be dead.


10 posted on 12/09/2018 2:02:35 PM PST by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

OK, just pissed off at least half of the voters. Getting off to a great start. Please, let’s see more wackos throw their hats in the ring.


11 posted on 12/09/2018 2:04:38 PM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
The original “F” Bomb “Mom” in a pussyhat and vagina costume. Her kids can be proud.


I am sure her sons will turn out to be fine American citizens! /s
12 posted on 12/09/2018 2:05:19 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie ("The MSM is the enemy of the American people"...Democrat Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Intersectionality: Translation - another Marxist dialiectic used to tear down social norms of any culture (Marxian cultural warfare), hoping to destroy that culture, and when it’s society is on its knees, build a new one on Marxist “scientific” principles.


13 posted on 12/09/2018 2:05:59 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The demonrats always have exemptions.


14 posted on 12/09/2018 2:09:43 PM PST by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as wll say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!"to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

And I as a male am supposed to cheer that?!


15 posted on 12/09/2018 2:13:18 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

intersectionalism ... WHAT you are.
this has been the democrats mantra for 30+ years

meanwhile, the GOP is more concerned with WHO you are.

WHO vs WHAT

well, which do we want our country to follow? I believe it’s WHO you are that matters.
And so did MLK Jr....

“... live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin (WHAT they are) but by the content of their character (WHO they are).”

this is an extremely significant FUNDAMENTAL difference between the parties


16 posted on 12/09/2018 2:15:53 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Yeah, good luck with that, Chica.


17 posted on 12/09/2018 2:18:22 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Women no longer want equality, they want to rule. It’s time to discard affirmative action and let the stronger prevail. That would be fair.


18 posted on 12/09/2018 2:25:32 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Idiot.

The future is not male or female. It belongs to those who work hard and smart.


19 posted on 12/09/2018 2:27:19 PM PST by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Various forms of foolishness do infact overlap and compound the stupidity of intersectionality and all who believe in it.


20 posted on 12/09/2018 2:29:04 PM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson