What do you think, FReeQs?
>>>
I think you are the most brilliant analyst we have.
The topics you mentioned would be an excellent way for Q to test capacity, so I’ll bet you are right.
I still think some of the topics the anons picked were stupid. One of my top questions would be the particulars of McCain’s death.
People don’t need to go to 8 chan to pay attention. To test response q only has to post any website link they can then watch in real time the Jump in hits to that site. And it would be a better indicator as most people get the q drops from Somewhere besides the Chan’s like here or Facebook etc.
[blushing]
Thank you! You are too kind.
There are a few other EXCELLENT analysts posting here, who I will not name for fear of offending someone by leaving them out. But ALL contribute and I am grateful for every one of you. Those who don’t “do analysis” contribute in so many ways: bringing facts, asking questions that make us stop and think, providing moral support and encouragement, aggregating and organizing information, and so much more!
I’m using “he” for simplicity of writing. I include all FReeQs!
Here IMO is how to spot an excellent analyst: Is he open-minded and willing to consider all possibilities? Does he attempt to formulate theories that fit ALL the known facts or just pick and choose those that support his view? Is he completely invested in a single point of view and only looking for things that support that point of view? Does he belittle anything/anyone that does not agree with his view? Is he willing to change his theory (flipflop!) when new facts become known?
That said, I *DO* have pre-conceived notions and pet theories and I *DO* try to see if facts fit them. (You have to start somewhere.) But when the facts don’t align, I look for new theories. I am still on the fence with RR/RM being black hat or white hat. I prefer the white hat theory, maybe because I’d prefer there to be more white hats and fewer black hats. But I am open to the truth, whatever it turns out to be. Whatever it is in this case, it’s going to have a lot of “plot twists”!
I hadn’t even thought of the issue of no name’s death as a topic for a Q question. I can’t say it’s on the top of my list, but it’s definitely on the list and one of the things I’d like the answer to. I am hoping that any “deal” made with him does NOT include keeping his crimes secret.
Agree. I would also try and reopen a particular area - IRS abuse - and ask Q about holding Koskinen and Lerner accountable for their actions.
Q-Anon carefully picked the ones they answered out of many. They must have had their reasons for picking precisely those.