[bagster]

A US Attorney may may bring charges against defendants who will ultimately be tried by tribunal,

And Huber is a US Attorney, right?

Tell that to Defiant. I already agree with you.

Bagster

[Gulf War One]

I don’t feel like arguing. He can find out for himself soon enough.

[generally]

https://twitter.com/gourdnibler/status/1040678572262916096

Tweet of video: the fake media trying to make storm look more dramatic. (Not saying it isn’t dangerous or that people shouldn’t evacuate or take shelter. Just saying the MSM is so fake.)

[haffast]

613

Q !UW.yye1fxo No.64
Jan 27 2018 00:42:19 (EST)

http://www.endusmilitarism.org/PDF/military_detention_of_US_citizens_and_18_USC_4001a.pdf

Q

---

We have been under a declared national emergency since EO Issued on: December 21, 2017 :

“I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.”

---

610
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.62
Jan 26 2018 18:43:27 (EST)

Read slowly and carefully.
Will become critically important in coming weeks.
Continue to track those who are resigning across all platforms.

Where there was once darkness, there will now be LIGHT.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

Q

---

Sen Lindsey Graham Questions Brett Kavanaugh Military Law vs Criminal Law. - 3:35 mins
https://youtu.be/3_gmOsnjrZwator

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_gmOsnjrZw

Graham Questions SCOTUS Nominee Kavanaugh - 30:11mins

Military Law segment starting at min 25:38 :

https://youtu.be/4uJXFgL-wa0?t=25m38s

---

I’m out of this battle tonight. I thought this was settled already.

[Defiant]

What are you saying? That a US Attorney can indict a criminal and then the criminal can be tried by a military tribunal if the crime fits into a military context? That is not surprising. What would be surprising, and that I doubt very much would happen, and which is what everyone seems to think would happen, is that DOJ attorneys would prosecute military tribunals, or that JAGs would be in US DIstrict court prosecuting military defendants. The two systems are separate, and would not be able to work together in a trial. You’re in one or the other.

I think people are confusing two branches of government working together to decide who will do what with two branches merging into one.