Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; MNDude; ptsal; ...

POTUS on FB: WRWY


341 posted on 09/14/2018 4:55:11 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]


To: generally

That’s certainly a proof IMO


379 posted on 09/14/2018 6:25:08 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: mo; eldoradude; USMC79to83; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; ...

I was merrily making replies to pings and mistakenly posted this reply to an intriguing theory by mo on the previous thread about Bill and Hillary having had the J. Edgar Hoover files in their possession, - that the Watergate break in was all about retrieving those documents.... and they had completed the set with the 900 FBI files when Bill got into office.

So..... here is my repost of some thoughts I had on mo’s extraordinary scenario. My apologies to my ping list, who have now received it twice:

mo said:
Somehow the whole game of mutually assured destruction hanging over the Repub/Dems the last 40 sumpin’ years has to be tied to JEH. His activities are the only nexus of all that.

Also the ONLY reason for Nixon to take that big risk in the burglary-as well as the subsequent shitstorm designed to keep those files from the public eye during the whole impeachment process. That’s what was on the table in reality

Those files would have gone back to the 1920’s and involved every individual and family of influence in the country for two generations. And it is likely Hillary was “updating them” in the late 1990’s

The CF/CGI scam was probably built on JEH’s grave

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
texokie said:
That makes a LOT of sense, mo. I had heard/read a few weeks ago that the Watergate break-in did have something to do with sexual indiscretions, but the JEH files could really be it. You have fleshed that thought out beautifully into a very plausible scenario.

I’m also wondering... during the Watergate proceedings - Hillary was said to have been fired for lack of integrity or whatever they called it.... do you think it is possible that THAT is when she could have gotten hold of the original Hoover files? And yet, how could she have had access??? And because she had somehow gotten them, is that why she was untouched other than removed? Was that the first time she was majorly protected from the consequences of a horrendous indiscretion? Hmmmmmm..... and.... (see below)
she got into Bill’s orbit in 1970....

OK TIMELINE TIME:

https://www.newsweek.com/fifteen-facts-you-may-not-know-about-hillary-clinton-322353

“According to Biography.com, Clinton was once a Republican, even campaigning for Barry Goldwater in 1964. She switched parties in 1968 and went on to work for Democratic nominee George McGovern in 1972 and Jimmy Carter in 1976.”

So that explains how she could end up on the Democrat Watergate investigatory team. Her tenure on the Watergate team also falls in the time frame of when she was paired with Bill - and before their marriage.

HILLARY DOES WATERGATE TEAM:
(SHE WAS A BAD GIRL)
https://www.westernjournal.com/hillary-clinton-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior/

“…When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.”
[texokie laughs: “17”??? ]

“Why?”

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality….”

“…The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.”

“The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970….”

OMG! Hillary SWIPED the Douglas papers which clearly provided precedent for someone in office to retain counsel when being impeached. SHE THEN TOOK THOSE PAPERS TO HER OFFICE TO HIDE THEM. SHE WROTE A BRIEF SAYING THERE IS NO PRECEDENT, AND NIXON SHOULD NOT HAVE COUNSEL!!”

OK. I’ll calm down.

So she is reported to have swiped some important papers in order to “fix” a case the way she wanted it. (We have seen that pattern over and over with them, haven’t we?)

Wonder if she was able to take some other papers at the same time as well. How would she have been able to know their location and who had custody, unless a very Large Higher Up enabled her?

Could those files have been available to the Watergate investigators? If so, why??? Were they evidence? Were the “Burglers” successful? Or were they unsuccessful? In either case, one would think the Hoover papers would be not only under lock and key, but would NEVER be spoken of.

If they were available to them for some reason - (again, why? - they are so explosive) - Did some Dem... or GOPe brag that he knew where they were?

She met Bill in 1970. He had been at Oxford 1968-1970.

Could she have been urged - protected by the Cabal/Rockefellers to get the JEH files by hook or by crook for Bill’s rise to power? Could doors have been open to her do so because of her relationship with Bill? Had he already been marked for greatness -yet needed to cheat? Did her crime family background make it seem that she was a suitable partner for him? Was obtaining them a test for her, as well as a key for their life together? Don’t know.... and this is just bald faced Spit N Whittle Club speculation.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/bill-hillary-clinton-years-gallery-1.2393148

In your post, mo, you remind us that Nixon left August 1974.
Bill and Hill were married October 11, 1975, (and as most of us know by now, had their honeymoon in Haiti.)

https://www.theknot.com/content/hillary-and-bill-clinton-wedding-storyWedding

So they married 14 months after Nixon left the White House. Did they start out on their Road to Happiness having been able to obtain JEH’s control papers? Who knows???

And of course, to be fair to the lovely young couple, perhaps Hillary did her misdeed as is described above and left it there. Perhaps she was protected because of Bill. Perhaps the very Large Higher Up generously gave the JEH papers to them for a simple little wedding present, knowing or suspecting how very creatively they would make use them. It’s the little things, you know.

All of this rank speculation may have great meaning….. and more than likely, perhaps not.

Nevertheless, the timing pattern still fits your scenario.

*texokie is dismayed that despite her best efforts, the sweater has unraveled beyond all recognition or ability for fingernail polish to rectify. She lovingly places it in the rag bag*

2,337 posted on 09/14/2018 10:15:04 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2336


466 posted on 09/14/2018 10:24:41 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson