|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 09/13/2018 9:16:12 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Thread Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table Anonymous Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Neonrevolt Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactions
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
The article you referenced conflates the investigation with prosecution. Huber and Horrowitz can conduct investigations as to crimes committed outside Huber’s jurisdiction. However, they cannot prosecute anyone.
6th ammendment:
” In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law...(etc.)
“which district shall have been previously ascertained by law” means you can’t simply extend someone’s jurisdiction after a crime was committed.
It is very clear.
are there mass graves somewhere ?
are there death certificates ?
were there burials ?
how many families have identified that family members died during the hurricane ?
have the P.Ricans that moved to the mainland been accounted for in this ?
cripes...
seems MSM has pretty much backed away from this story...their hit & run tactics at work.
“You’re not very bright or well-informed. You do seem deplorable.”
And you guys wonder why the rest of the board rarely participates here in your safespace Q threads.
Super interesting. No coincidences!
I have heard/read from several sources lately that said words to the effect of “Everyone knows that the WaPo is used by the clowns to disseminate their propaganda.” *I* didn’t know that, but it seems obvious when you stop and think about it.
I’ve also read in several places recently that Woodward (and Bernstein?) is a clown asset or works for the clowns or is controlled by them. It’s not clear to me what the exact relationship is, whether he’s an employee or not, but I have to admit that makes a lot of sense, too. Another mystery that maybe we’ll learn the truth of when the truth comes out.
Amen
Great points.
As far as “massive secret arrests”, I expect “massive arrests” - eventually - due to the massive number of indictments. Not sure where people got the “secret” idea from, but maybe because of all the speculation on no name.
I like your analysis.
>> Why are these people being given extra time to work the coverup?
JMO. They aren’t. They’re being given extra time to further incriminate themselves.
And more important, POTUS is waiting for the optimum time to attack.
You don’t schedule D-Day for the day after Pearl Harbor; you schedule it for the time and day and location when it will have optimal results, when all your troops are trained and ready, when you have all the information you need, when the enemy has been weakened by earlier strategic operations, when the weather is optimal, when the enemy has been deceived into thinking the attack will happen somewhere else and at some other time, when the enemy is in disarray.
Thank you for the HUA explanation.
Now, what about Ooh-rah?
The Unexpected Hanging.
The version I heard said that he would be executed during a particular week and he made the inductive argument that you gave. But then the hangman came for him on Tuesday, which was entirely unexpected!
Amen
...the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security...
That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.”
Bagster
I don't wonder, derpie.
Here's a tissue for your issue.
Bagster
Excellent points.
The fleck is very lugubrious and challenged. /bot response
mark
I’m on James O’Keefe’s mailing list. Got this yesterday. I wish I had lots of money to donate but I do not.
Dear Friend,
The Veritas team is about to release powerful revelations about the Deep State.
There is a network of government employees using their federal positions for personal agendas.
They have taken power that wasn’t delegated to them under the Constitution.
More than that, the Deep State is already huge and growing.
There are millions of federal employees creating rules and regulations that carry the force of law. And they remain in power irrespective of who wins at the ballot box.
They don’t care about the law, they care about forcing their political views upon others without their knowledge! They seem most concerned about not getting caught.
The Deep State may be hiding in the shadows but we’ve seen them:
Leaking classified information to “sabotage” opponents.
Resisting the three branches of government.
Using the IRS to target conservative groups.
Publishing “anonymous” commentary like the recent New York Times op-ed column.
The Deep State has become even more brazen since Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016. They’re using their government positions in a quest to destroy political opponents.
Last year, John Brennan, Barack Obama’s former CIA director, remarked that executive branch officials have an “obligation...to refuse to carry out” orders from President Donald Trump.
The Deep State is openly resisting the will of the people.
Can you imagine how things could have played out if Project Veritas had an undercover source inside of former IRS executive Lois Lerner’s office?
Your support can make such a thing possible.
No one knows what the Deep State is doing so I’ve sent in my team to get answers.
Please click and follow this link to make a donation right now.
Your support will help Project Veritas unmask the Deep State.
In our next video, an employee in the Executive Branch, boasts “Resist everything. Every level. F*** s*** up.” You’ll be able to see a close-up shot of his eyes while he says it.
Unlike the New York Times, we won’t omit the “source” to hide the insurgent.
Donate now and help us reach the widest possible audience.
You know the names of these agencies. And you know their tricks. We want to unmask them for you to see and hear.
But I can’t do it without you.
With your help, Project Veritas is going to put faces and names on this shadow-revolt.
Trailer at link.
https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/09/14/unmasking-the-deep-state-manifesto/
We are unmasking the Deep State. Here’s why.
by James O’Keefe September 14, 2018
What is the Deep State?
Why is Project Veritas about to unmask it?
To some, the Deep State is an anonymous, faceless resistance; or as Glenn Greenwald first penned, the entity which “… goes to war with the president-elect, using unverified claims.”
To others, it is a vast administrative bureaucracy, unaccountable to anyone; in fact, an “extralegal state within a state.”
Some call it part of a conspiracy theory. And, at least one conspirator recently received priceless support for their agenda through the op-ed pages of The New York Times.
But who wrote that piece? What was his name? Are there others? How many of them were there? We’ll get to that.
But first, some political science, or as my mentor Saul Alinsky would say, “We should start with what the world is, not as we would like it to be.”
This unelected cabal of federal government employees—the Deep Staters—are getting away with subverting the will of the people. In fact, the Constitution is being stomped upon by the actions of the members of the Deep State. They are in all branches of government and they are hiding among two million other federal employees.
At the most fundamental level, Americans make their voices heard through elections. This is the process to bestow consent for our representatives to govern on our behalf.
The actions of the Deep State fly in the face of the consent part of the governance equation. They seek to subvert the “democratic” process, and through those actions are creating inequality in the application of the Rule of Law. When this is permitted to happen, the will of the people can be thwarted in favor of any agenda that can gain support among the other comrades in the Deep State. That should worry progressives, civil libertarians, and journalists a lot more than it should worry fascists.
Members of the Deep State view themselves as having nothing to lose.
In many ways, they are correct. Government employees use their federal union representation to further an insurgence against the wishes of the people.
Congress used to be a lawmaking body, but it has significantly abdicated its authority to executive branch agencies. Many agencies now exist with little oversight. Much of Washington operates without accountability or transparency, because — and this foreshadows what’s about to come from Project Veritas — some of them are quite brazen in expressing, “It’s impossible to fire a federal employee.”
As a nation of laws, we expect the people we elect to make and uphold the laws, not disregard them. The agencies of Washington D.C. also must be held accountable.
Then there is the Fourth Estate, which has been fanning the flames of the Deep State prior to, and aggressively so since, November 7, 2016. The media has created a cycle of politically motivated leaking followed by retrenchment when those “leaks” were proven to have been deeply misleading. We also have seen a confluence of error-ridden ‘scoops’ of shadowy intelligence agencies colluding with political operatives to dispel or prove political narratives.
We don’t get to see the faces of these shadowy figures, are unable to assess their motives; and the media seems to ignore their real and often obvious objectives.
Therefore, it becomes necessary to unmask and show the faces of these individuals who seek to disturb the fabric of our Republic. In order to do that, it becomes necessary to expose them with their own words.
Our next hidden camera investigation is going to unmask the Deep State.
No doubt the media will object to this, first in terms of methods. They’ll claim that it’s unethical to record people without their consent and produce that into a video story.
It isn’t. Certainly not when another person is present and doing the recording. Surreptitious recordings are not an invasion of their privacy. We, through establishing a rapport with these Deep State people outside their offices, have no duty to keep the information the subject tells us confidential. We did not entrap them. For all of us, their images and voices capture their character much more accurately than any portrait of them painted through a complex arrangement of words on newsprint.
What makes people uncomfortable about surreptitious recordings, is their power: the brutal reality, the rawness and irrefutable nature; make them all the more necessary.
Undercover recordings are not unethical. What is, is the use and abuse of anonymous sources in journalism over the last two years. One commentator described the recent bold license taken by Bob Woodward. Woodward offers second-hand quotes from anonymous sources, months after the events in question. One source described Woodward as “… a Washington ventriloquist who keeps straight the strings of the talking puppets.”
Unlike the author of Fear, we won’t quote anonymous sources in the administration relaying what happened. We’re going to put anonymous Deep State players on the record, unbeknownst to them.
And unlike the New York Times op-ed page, we won’t omit the author or speaker’s name to “… protect them from losing their job.” They don’t need much protection. Federal job security is so great, federal workers are more likely to die at work than lose their jobs. That’s right, death — rather than poor performance, misconduct or layoffs — is the primary threat to federal workers’ job security.
When we release our series of stories, we’ll give you the names and show the faces of those who choose to “resist” while being sustained by patriotic taxpayers. When the subject of our next video, an employee in the Executive Branch, says, “Resist everything. Every level. F*** s*** up;” you’ll be able to see his name and his face. You’ll also see his title, direct employer, the movement of his lips, the cadence in his voice, his demeanor, his arrogance, his lack of introspection, and ultimately, him bragging about how nobody will ever hold his comrades nor him accountable.
When an employee of the executive branch gloats about targeting private citizens in an effort to “… go against the Constitution of America,” how could we NOT publish his name.
There is a deeper philosophical reason we do this.
Transparency is required of those that govern. Privacy belongs to the people that put them there.
The consensus in Washington is the inverse of this statement, because it serves their own political interests, not the people’s interests. But when we protect the identities of those seeking to thwart the consent of the governed; and support attacks against citizens because of their creed, thoughts or political donations — a severe injustice is done.
Herein lies the conflict of visions between Project Veritas and the Media Establishment.
Project Veritas must unmask and show you the faces of representative members of the Deep State. Government exists with the consent of the governed and that consent cannot be manufactured by the masked and subversive. This truth must be pursued at all costs, including going undercover. Project Veritas’ main goal is to deliver ‘Veritas to the Vulgate’ or ‘Truth to the Masses,’ which we believe is the core of journalism. Opinion and anonymity are available in abundance, but the truth is sometimes scarce but always paramount.
We’re going to expose these people to hinder their efforts and because it likely will deter others. We are confident Americans are going to do the right thing if they have the facts. They simply don’t have transparency to what’s going on. They have no idea. The executive and legislative branches of government may have to buck up and do their jobs and institute sweeping reforms. Perhaps there will be a restoration of the separation of powers and equality before the law.
So, we’re going to expose them…
One-by-one.
We are finishing the search for every rotten, crooked, law-breaking individual in this Deep State. We and others are going to find you.
We’re going to unmask you.
We’re going to make you famous.
In Veritas,
James O’Keefe
That was my question, too - the ‘hot dog stand’ reference is oddly curious in the context of what’s behind the scenes here *and* the Manafort cooperation agreement that came with MSM caveats it wouldn’t involve Trump and hints to Gregg Craig & Podesta Co.
From wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_FBI_files_controversy
Craig Livingstone, director of the White House’s Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports concerning several hundred individuals without asking permission. The revelations provoked a strong political and press reaction because many of the files covered White House employees from previous Republican administrations, including top presidential advisors.
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, may have requested and read the files for political purposes
not from Wikipedia...
IIRC, The files “went missing” and were later “discovered” in the WH. Also IIRC, they were discovered IN THE FAMLY QUARTERS. Not in some office or something. Seriously??? No one bought that story then, and no one’s buying it now.
Lefty sites use words like “improperly”, “inadvertently”, accidentally”.
Sites that are less lefty than Wiki say the files were ILLEGALLY obtained.
From NYT (!) : “A White House assistant who discovered them said she found them on a table in a library known as the Book Room, to which very few people other than the First Family have access.” It also says that HRC fingerprints were all over the files. Literal fingerprints. https://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/05/us/hillary-clinton-s-fingerprints-among-those-found-on-papers.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
