Q Anon: 09/09/18 Trust Trump's Plan

To: grey_whiskers

first pull his security privilege.

2,321 posted on 09/14/2018 3:28:20 AM PDT by stylin19a ((Best.Election.Of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever))

Yes. EMP. It doesn’t happen if you don’t measure it. Same with prions and cattle in the US. The US gov’t is the only entity that can test for it here.

2,322 posted on 09/14/2018 3:28:40 AM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)

To: Snowybear; bagster; Swordmaker; ransomnote; TEXOKIE; DAVEY CROCKETT

That is sure a standard FR stance on almost anything the least bit unconventional, unheralded by the MSM as 'reality.'

However, in our era the Ocham's razor simplest probability is fairly relentlessly the case--that there IS some degree of conspiracy in a vast array of major events, false flags etc.

So much so, that it is the most efficient and conservative stance to ASSUME initially that there IS some degree of conspiracy likely.

Lots of things are not as they seem.

It appears that the gas explosions may well not be part of a conspiracy. HOWEVER, THAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN.

Stranger things have happened. And, POTUS and Q-Anon have warned us about various kinds of attacks by the 'Deep State.' We are wise to remember those exhortations when analyzing any significant public event involving trauma and damage; and/or propaganda and fear.

FR is a LOT more robust than a long list of old timers assume. Anyone who is well informed and thoughtful knows better than to pretend that FR is kookdom. Being paranoid about what others think of FR because of various hypotheses about dramatic events is counterproductive and imho, myopic tunnel vision that serves the enemy a LOT MORE than even the wilder brainstorming generated hypotheses.

The fact remains that FR is probably the best organization, group of bright creative minds with conservative patriotic values to sift through the complexities of information and tease out what really happened. We do ourselves and the Republic a disservice to hamstring that brainstorming.

Trying to keep the brainstorming and hypotheses between very narrow sanitized boundaries (largely constructed by the MSM liars) is nonsensical and, imho UNpatriotic.

Let our brilliant minds do the sorting without a shred of bowing to the MSM's pontifications about reality. THEY are the guilty party beginning to end. THEY are the lying idiots beginning to end. THEY are the ones wanting to bring the Republic down around all our ankles. THEY are the crazy people.

2,323 posted on 09/14/2018 3:30:20 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)

look at Feinstein’s bank accounts.

She was running a “mini-HRC” operation leaking stuff out to China through her “chauffeur”

2,324 posted on 09/14/2018 3:35:26 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

Columbia is gonna have some expensive torts headed their way.

google “natural gas dirty sisters”

2,325 posted on 09/14/2018 4:26:03 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

Now this, my FRiend, is super interesting

Add what we know about the clinton White House hiding 900 FBI files and we seem to have a pattern.

For those too young to remember: Washington Times "Hilary Clinton Scandals, FBI, etc.."

These people are sick

2,326 posted on 09/14/2018 5:57:03 AM PDT by USMC79to83

"Please don’t read anything into the NG situation in MA. Not everything is a conspiracy. That just makes us look bad."

Just reporting the discussion on *that other site*.

2,327 posted on 09/14/2018 9:46:34 AM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

To: JockoManning

2,328 posted on 09/14/2018 11:57:13 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

To: USMC79to83; mo; Disestablishmentarian; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; ...

mo said To: Disestablishmentarian:
RMN....suppose..

J Edgar Hoover dies 05/02/72-may have kept his control files at his house where he lived with Clyde Tolson in DC.

Watergate Breakin DNC 06/17/72-what if was about those control files? Mebbe the Democrats beat the pubbies to them?Mebbe Nixon was trying to get hold of the control files?

July 1973 BOTH Nixon and Agnew under attack; the latter on bribery charges for bribes solicited while Governor of MD. (mebbe a little item like that was kept track of by JEH?)Agnew is out by October 1973; Nixon by August 1974

What if....Hillary Rodham got her claws on those control files? 2 years later, Husband Bill Clinton, age 32, is elected the youngest governor ever in America. Those 2 grifters have been riding that horse ever since.

Makes more sense tho than anything we’ve ever been told-including that JEH’s files “were destroyed” after his death

2,091 posted on 9/13/2018, 2:55:36 PM by mo (”If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don’t understand, no explanation is possible”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2036

THEN
USMC79to83 said to mo:

Now this, my FRiend, is super interesting
Add what we know about the clinton White House hiding 900 FBI files and we seem to have a pattern.

For those too young to remember: Washington Times “Hilary Clinton Scandals, FBI, etc..”

These people are sick
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Excellent post on the possible disposition/war over the JEH files.... and I had a similar response as USMC9to83 about the “Filegate” where Hillary got her hands on raw FBI files as First Lady.... wonder if the 900 are the ones compiled subsequent to the JEH files, maybe? With those, did she have the complete - or close to complete set?

Thanks for the ping, USMC79to83.

Outstanding little thought experiment there, mo!

2,329 posted on 09/14/2018 1:22:17 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

To: Calm_Cool_and_Elected

Absolutely love your tag line.

2,330 posted on 09/14/2018 1:25:59 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44

“Filegate” where Hillary got her hands on raw FBI files as First Lady.... wonder if the 900 are the ones compiled subsequent to the JEH files, maybe? With those, did she have the complete - or close to complete set?

And the use of those files across state lines for ongoing extortion... wonder if any of the indictments cover that?

2,331 posted on 09/14/2018 1:39:33 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)

2,332 posted on 09/14/2018 2:10:47 PM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)

What a great question..... and here’s hoping that it could be the case!

2,333 posted on 09/14/2018 3:23:32 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

Interesting “co-incidence”....

2,334 posted on 09/14/2018 3:36:23 PM PDT by Bigg Red (The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})

To: Fellow Traveler

Well, I wonder if some street justice will be headed the way of the accused:

http://www.fergieinfo.com/2018/07/07/pedophiles-decapitated-corpse-found-on-judges-doorstep-after-bail-hearing/

2,335 posted on 09/14/2018 3:43:25 PM PDT by Bigg Red (The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})

Somehow the whole game of mutually assured destruction hanging over the Repub/Dems the last 40 sumpin’ years has to be tied to JEH. His activities are the only nexus of all that.

Also the ONLY reason for Nixon to take that big risk in the burglary-as well as the subsequent shitstorm designed to keep those files from the public eye during the whole impeachment process. That’s what was on the table in reality

Those files would have gone back to the 1920’s and involved every individual and family of influence in the country for two generations. And it is likely Hillary was “updating them” in the late 1990’s

The CF/CGI scam was probably built on JEH’s grave

2,336 posted on 09/14/2018 4:06:15 PM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")

To: mo; eldoradude; USMC79to83; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; ...

Somehow the whole game of mutually assured destruction hanging over the Repub/Dems the last 40 sumpin’ years has to be tied to JEH. His activities are the only nexus of all that.

The CF/CGI scam was probably built on JEH’s grave

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

That makes a LOT of sense, mo. I had heard/read a few weeks ago that the Watergate break-in did have something to do with sexual indiscretions, but the JEH files could really be it. You have fleshed that thought out beautifully into a very plausible scenario.

I’m also wondering... during the Watergate proceedings - Hillary was said to have been fired for lack of integrity or whatever they called it.... do you think it is possible that THAT is when she could have gotten hold of the original Hoover files? And yet, how could she have had access??? And because she had somehow gotten them, is that why she was untouched other than removed? Was that the first time she was majorly protected from the consequences of a horrendous indiscretion? Hmmmmmm..... and.... (see below)
she got into Bill’s orbit in 1970....

OK TIMELINE TIME:

https://www.newsweek.com/fifteen-facts-you-may-not-know-about-hillary-clinton-322353

“According to Biography.com, Clinton was once a Republican, even campaigning for Barry Goldwater in 1964. She switched parties in 1968 and went on to work for Democratic nominee George McGovern in 1972 and Jimmy Carter in 1976.”

So that explains how she could end up on the Democrat Watergate investigatory team. Her tenure on the Watergate team also falls in the time frame of when she was paired with Bill - and before their marriage.

HILLARY DOES WATERGATE TEAM:
(SHE WAS A BAD GIRL)
https://www.westernjournal.com/hillary-clinton-fired-for-lies-unethical-behavior/

“…When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.”
[texokie laughs: “17”??? ]

“Why?”

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality….”

“…The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.”

“The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970….”

OMG! Hillary SWIPED the Douglas papers which clearly provided precedent for someone in office to retain counsel when being impeached. SHE THEN TOOK THOSE PAPERS TO HER OFFICE TO HIDE THEM. SHE WROTE A BRIEF SAYING THERE IS NO PRECEDENT, AND NIXON SHOULD NOT HAVE COUNSEL!!”

OK. I’ll calm down.

So she is reported to have swiped some important papers in order to “fix” a case the way she wanted it. (We have seen that pattern over and over with them, haven’t we?)

Wonder if she was able to take some other papers at the same time as well. How would she have been able to know their location and who had custody, unless a very Large Higher Up enabled her?

Could those files have been available to the Watergate investigators? If so, why??? Were they evidence? Were the “Burglers” successful? Or were they unsuccessful? In either case, one would think the Hoover papers would be not only under lock and key, but would NEVER be spoken of.

If they were available to them for some reason - (again, why? - they are so explosive) - Did some Dem... or GOPe brag that he knew where they were?

She met Bill in 1970. He had been at Oxford 1968-1970.

Could she have been urged - protected by the Cabal/Rockefellers to get the JEH files by hook or by crook for Bill’s rise to power? Could doors have been open to her do so because of her relationship with Bill? Had he already been marked for greatness -yet needed to cheat? Did her crime family background make it seem that she was a suitable partner for him? Was obtaining them a test for her, as well as a key for their life together? Don’t know.... and this is just bald faced Spit N Whittle Club speculation.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/bill-hillary-clinton-years-gallery-1.2393148

In your post, mo, you remind us that Nixon left August 1974.
Bill and Hill were married October 11, 1975, (and as most of us know by now, had their honeymoon in Haiti.)

https://www.theknot.com/content/hillary-and-bill-clinton-wedding-storyWedding

So they married 14 months after Nixon left the White House. Did they start out on their Road to Happiness having been able to obtain JEH’s control papers? Who knows???

And of course, to be fair to the lovely young couple, perhaps Hillary did her misdeed as is described above and left it there. Perhaps she was protected because of Bill. Perhaps the very Large Higher Up generously gave the JEH papers to them for a simple little wedding present, knowing or suspecting how very creatively they would make use them. It’s the little things, you know.

All of this rank speculation may have great meaning….. and more than likely, perhaps not.

Nevertheless, the timing pattern still fits your scenario.

*texokie is dismayed that despite her best efforts, the sweater has unraveled beyond all recognition or ability for fingernail polish to rectify. She lovingly places it in the rag bag*

2,337 posted on 09/14/2018 10:15:04 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

Take a look at this thread here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3687699/posts?page=5

Do you really think that Q would survive here?

2,338 posted on 09/14/2018 11:22:20 PM PDT by Revel

To: ichabod1; jimrob

"I want to think JB is a bot, but he’s too long winded so I think he’s just a doofus who may or may not be on David Brock’s payroll. Mac_truck and Drdude I think may be among Snow White’s seven dwarves. There’s ways to spot’em."

I'm not a bot.
I'm not paid by anyone for posting anything.
And especially I have no association with the odious David Brock, or his paymaster Soros!
That's a rude insult

It is delusional to suggest that everyone who doesn't believe in Q is a liberal and a plant. Seeing as most Freepers don't believe in any aspect of Q, that would make most Freepers libs, using this logic.

It's faulty thinking.

I'm exactly what I seem, a 20 year tenure Freeper working towards my 20,000th post.

To suggest that I, and others who been here for decades, were planted here twenty years ago borders on paranoid schizophrenia. But that's what I've been accused of by people on these threads.

Add to that now speculation that on a bot!!

It's this sort of endless ad hominem attacks that has caused Reddit and 4chan to ban Q boards.

And I've not come onto these threads to call people names, and have left off posting on them entirely, and announced it, because I'm not interested in arguing about basic stuff and pissing people off in the process. Q thread people have a right to believe what they want, and post about it as long as the proprieter is ok with it.

But I'm certainly going to respond to people leveling ridiculous claims against me on these threads

Basically the value of these threads is getting lower.

2,339 posted on 09/15/2018 4:54:09 PM PDT by Jack Black

I vote not a bot and enjoy your posts. Disagree with the value part. And you know, deep in your heart Q is real.

2,340 posted on 09/15/2018 4:58:46 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (Free)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794