Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AllAmericanGirl44

Please help me understand, I wasn’t really able to keep up yesterday and now I’m completely lost. The Twitter comments add to the confusion.
Thanks
_________________________________________

We’ve been seeing alot of excitement around reportforthepresident.org and their promise to produce and share “the president’s report” which has received support from Tracy Beanz and Ann Vandersteel. There were early questions about the new site, including it’s decisions to use low level web hosting services and requiring $7 montly subscription price. Q has confirmed that the website and the group supporting it, https://twitter.com/jtfmaga, are “paytriots” which means they are profit driven, which Q always advises us to avoid. The truth is free to you ‘n me. :)


2,015 posted on 09/09/2018 1:00:40 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1992 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

I am still a little confused, too. I don’t like how they (reportforpresident) promised this buildup and now seem to be on a ‘drip, drip’ + apparent pay to play access? Not what was being advertised IMO.

There was a time when some anon found pics of Thomas Drake and suggested he was “Q” leading Drake to post this: https://mobile.twitter.com/thomas_drake1/status/945440477335162880


2,017 posted on 09/09/2018 1:05:49 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2015 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

btw I don’t think there’s so much to the trace back of the domain - somebody probably came up with the idea, they found it was available and then somebody nabbed it (from godaddy as I recall). Then they transferred to a Network Solutions hosted site (it’s got to be hosted somewhere). I still don’t know what to make of the connection to Drake here and what exactly “Q” is pointing to - my first impression and ties to the other site with Posobiec clearly suggests they’re both suspect but that doesn’t mean reportforthepresident site won’t have something, just that it would be assembled for alternative purpose(s) and narrative(s)


2,020 posted on 09/09/2018 1:12:45 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2015 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Thank you, I did see the comments regarding the new site and how some believed it should be approached carefully as it looked suspect.
So the Twitter Q linked is showing a man who declares he is NOT part of that new site and that they had falsely attached his name to it? So the Twitter guy is a good guy, for pointing out the abuse?

Thanks again, I’m struggling to get a grip on this story.


2,031 posted on 09/09/2018 1:36:14 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2015 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson