btw I don’t think there’s so much to the trace back of the domain - somebody probably came up with the idea, they found it was available and then somebody nabbed it (from godaddy as I recall). Then they transferred to a Network Solutions hosted site (it’s got to be hosted somewhere). I still don’t know what to make of the connection to Drake here and what exactly “Q” is pointing to - my first impression and ties to the other site with Posobiec clearly suggests they’re both suspect but that doesn’t mean reportforthepresident site won’t have something, just that it would be assembled for alternative purpose(s) and narrative(s)
It seems the group listed Drake as a “prominent whistleblower” in such a way that Drake felt it implied association and he wanted to make clear there was none. The group removed his name. Perhaps Q cited those links because Drake also comments that the fact they included his name might call into question the group’s integrity. So my impression is that Drake is not in question but that his comments about the group were the most useful (balanced?).