Q Anon: 09/05/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 09/05/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

I thought it was odd when Tracy Beanz seemed thoroughly exhilarated by this report - she kept interrupting her own program to just stop and GUSH over how BIG this report and this group were. She kept saying, “you just don’t KNOW how big this is.” At the time, I found it annoying. I may be the only one who considers Tracy Beanz something of a “paytriot” and now I think this excessively gushing coverage may be more than just odd; I wonder if she and or Vandersteel were paid to promote that site?

[JockoManning]

Or else, with OCD types, relationships suffer in behalf of floors polished every few days. SIGH. I think God's priorities are weighted toward relationships.

Don't Jews clean their house thoroughly once or twice a year? I forget what the Old Testament said about that. We don't do that. Sigh.

[stylin19a]

BBB333 has been on and off the “Q” threads for awhile.

I know i forget sometimes, but it used to be a FR courtesy, that when an FR user has been named in a post, you also reply to that user. Since I mentioned BBB333, he/she is also included in the reply.
Perhaps some others could also remember the courtesy.

[LonePalm]

Happy Birthday. Hope you get what you want (as well as what you need).

How about a trackball?

WWG1WGA

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[grey_whiskers]

You might make the case that God is against dishwashing machines, too.

Wipe the inside of the cup, and the outside will be clean too. /guy wishful thinking on housework>

[mac_truck]

Don't be fooled...Patriot Soapbox is the hoax, not Jack Posobiec.

The QAnon conspiracy isn’t new; it’s the oldest scam out there

Y'all can keep Jerome Corsi though, he's the Papa Smurf of the Paytriot movement.

[SERKIT]

From Mr. Soetoro's speech as he inappropriately receives an award for "ethics" from a school that employed "Billy the Bomber" Ayers as a staff professor.

"It should not be Democratic or Republican, it should not be a partisan issue to say that we do not pressure the attorney general or the FBI to use the criminal justice system as a cudgel to punish our political opponents. Or to explicitly call on the attorney general to protect members of our own party from prosecution because an election happens to be coming up. I'm not making that up. That's not hypothetical. It shouldn't be Democratic or Republican to say that we don't threaten the freedom of the press because – they say things or publish stories we don't like.

Holy Horse Hockey Batman! Where do you start?

This verbal excrement comes from a guy who told us we could keep our insurance plan and our doctor....multiple times.

He used a pseudonym to exchange email with his SoS only to deny it, then claim he only learned about Hillary's home-brew server when he read news reports about it.

If I remember correctly, Barry used his entire intelligence community, with full cooperation of his DNI, CIA, FBI, AG, DoJ, and foreign allies --- as a political cudgel --- against a Presidential candidate and for another.

Wasn't it Barry that used his intelligence community to investigate reporters, place some reporters on the do-not-fly list, and wiretap the Associated Press?

Wasn't it the DoJ, the AG, and the FBI ---- not hypothetically ---- that conspired to thwart any investigation of Hillary's serial Federal crimes?

[ransomnote]

It seems the group listed Drake as a “prominent whistleblower” in such a way that Drake felt it implied association and he wanted to make clear there was none. The group removed his name. Perhaps Q cited those links because Drake also comments that the fact they included his name might call into question the group’s integrity. So my impression is that Drake is not in question but that his comments about the group were the most useful (balanced?).

[Steven W.]

The tag “paytriot” is appropriate but also distinguishes a line which gets to “clickbait” which “Q” has alluded to. I like much of what Tracy Beanz or any number of folks online do but they’re factually “paytriot” and “clickbait” (Beanz and others pitch her/their patreon - which is fine but caveat emptor). For that matter, Hannity, too falls into the realm (”Tick Tock” is the epitome of clickbait). I have no doubt that Hannity is a (true) patriot but he is also a sensationalist and narrative + ratings driven. My problem with Hannity is that he doesn’t let his great guests use the time to say what have to say.

The main point “Q” has given in these regards is that very few know the intricate details of The Plan that gets to the roles of RR + the Mule & Horowitz + Huber, etc. As “Q” intimated, many speculate but few actually know ;)

[Steven W.]

I saw a good response to Hussein somewhere to the effect that the acts & testimony of Strzok, Page, Ohr, Comey, Simpson, etc. suggests otherwise ;)

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Thank you, I did see the comments regarding the new site and how some believed it should be approached carefully as it looked suspect.
So the Twitter Q linked is showing a man who declares he is NOT part of that new site and that they had falsely attached his name to it? So the Twitter guy is a good guy, for pointing out the abuse?

Thanks again, I’m struggling to get a grip on this story.

[Yulee]

Q

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Now I’m more confused! Posobiec is a fraud? Anyone hanging with the fraud Spencer has to be one too!
So the new site is an attempt by DS to ‘control’ the opposition?
Do I have that right?
Thanks

[Steven W.]

I looked again and am still unsure. I don’t like they have drops apparently scheduled every other day for next week - that’s “clickbait” and NOT a “report” that we were “promised”. It’s not too much different than Wikileaks though - ultimately it will be any derivatives that are the subject; if they present things of value, it will be those documents or evidence or subjects themselves that will be the subject(s) of scrutiny.

The curious thing I think is the tangential relationship that’s present in the “Q” post - Drake remains an unknown for me (apparently anti-Trump whistleblower - not necessarily good nor bad, yet = unknown). Drake is then tied to jtfmaga which is tied to OANN and then Posobiec - at least I think I have that chain right. I like OANN, used to like Posobiec & now know he’s a fool but don’t dismiss anything +/- everything otherwise.

[stylin19a]

looks like https://www.jtfmaga.com/team is the same team as https://www.reportforthepresident.org/team

or am I late to the party...?

[MomwithHope]

.

[Defiant]

Don’t change a thing, and don’t let the idiot cause one millisecond of thought for you. You are doing yeoman’s work that will long be remembered here and elsewhere. The other guy will slink away and be forgotten.

[Defiant]

The beginnings of Rod Rosenstein’s loss of power

How can we say goodbye to Rosie when he won't go away?

[Swordmaker]

I’d much rather you erred on the side of too much info vs too little. And you do splendidly, regardless.

Thanks, I struggle with it on every LexiQon entry.

[truthluva]

Don’t change a thing, Swordmaster. I really appreciate the work you do on the Lexicon and find it helpful when the thread is busy and I am trying to catch up!!