Do the same with about 2/3rds of the Q-drops - they urge research and suggest certain outcomes. The research part is not controversial at all.
Do the same with about 2/3rds of the Q-drops - they urge research and suggest certain outcomes. The research part is not controversial at all.
Oh I agree, and it's so much easier to verify the research these days, as there is a lot of videos out there helping people out on all this. There really is no reason for trolls here but I do believe they are on a mission.
FWIW a few more observations, I've battle a few trolls on these threads and other Q threads on the main board. They share many common traits as some of the liberal trolls I've dealt with around the net.
One of the biggies is their constant use of the Alinsky playbook to downplay and ridicule the movement.
Another is they are very arrogant and close-mined. Not that conservatives can be this way, most all liberal trolls are this way.
Liberal trolls ignore facts when thrown at them and these FR disrupters do the exact same thing.
One big one Swordsmaker pointed out is they base their opinions about Q on their feelings, without any facts to back them up. That is a very common trait they share with liberals in general.
I do believe the attacks aren't just coming from deep state media assets, it includes their assets here. The desperation is outing these trolls.
CGato