Q Anon: 07/25/18 "Trust The Plan"

qanon.pub ^ | 7/25/2018 | Freepers, vanity

[Mears]

“My grandfather graduated from dental school in 1920. I never experienced his “technique” but according to both my parents it was crude and painful.”

---

Did he ever practice in the Boston area?

I went to a dentist in that area in the 40s and early 50s and it was pure hell.

.

[little jeremiah]

Just pure luck. The tall fir trees around the house (WAY too close) have grown very tall with big crowns and nothing shows up with aerial photos. Too far from road, plus fence/gate, for anyone to see. I don’t even know if our rural area has google street photos, I think not.

[Snowybear]

New Praying Medic.

https://prayingmedic.com/2018/07/28/q-anon-something-big-about-to-drop/

[Melian]

Yes, that was it. The second and third guys are critical...but where did we see it? Thank you.

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

Judging by the amount of incoming AA fire, we must be somewhere over the target.

See y’all at OhDarkThirty.

[bagster]

Thanks, very fair response.

I'm a people person, Jack. Just like you.

As I recall, Q started on 4chan. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's my recollection, and several web sites seem to agree.

No, you are absolutely right Jack. Thing is, that's not what you said. You said this,

...it is simply NOT THE SAME as reporting on what a completely anonymous person on 4chan says.

You have an annoying habit of, when called out for being wrong, goinging back and changing what you originally said to make it fit your new argument. As if you were never wrong in the first place. It makes it aggravating to argue with you. Intellectual honesty is important to me, Jack.

As for the rest of your diatribe, I'm not really a techno nerd. For me, Q's legitimacy is confirmed. I don't give a damn where he started posting, where he posts now, what cookies or trip codes he uses, etc.

Those are the arguments of a man who doesn't think Q is "real." They have been made and settled, as far as I'm concerned and are so last year.

Do try to keep up, Jack. You're a good sport, even when you're being passive aggressive for the audience. I think it's kinda cute, actually.

For now, I must bid you adieu, goodman. I'm shifting into entertainment mode. All Q and no play makes Bags a dull boy. (though you are also semi-entertaining.)

Good night, Jack.

:)

Bagster

[Disestablishmentarian]

In the Enron crisis the entire accounting firm of Arther Anderson (sic) was found to be cooking the books.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SHAME!

This is UTTERLY FALSE. The destruction of Arthur Andersen was a great crime against a venerated and great American accounting firm. They were NOT accused of "cooking the books." One Houston-based partner was intimidated by the heavy-handed prosecutor (Mueller's Andrew Weissmann) into a guilty plea, relative to some questionable advice given to Enron: "Check your shredding policies."

Then the government used the "Partnership" aspect of Andersen to indict the whole firm, knowing full well it was a death sentence (DEATH WITHOUT A TRIAL!), because no firm under indictment for any SEC violation is allowed to engage in public accounting--Andersen's primary business.

Later AA was vindicated ... but it was too late. The jobs and the partnership equity of thousands of good people who had worked there all their lives were destroyed in a flash.

I call SHAME for your IGNORANTLY SLANDERING this great company, which was the VICTIM OF A GREAT CRIME perpetrated by the U.S. Government.

[edzo4]

from the article you posted:

"This was actually taken with "Cam4", which is a little wider angle than Cam2 and pointing in the same direction."

and

"It is a Canon T3 Rebel set up as a webcam. Images are captured about every 40-45 seconds. 3.5/20 second exposure/ 1600iso. I only run it on clear nights or when there could be severe weather."

so see where it says 3.5/20 that means the wider angle was a 3 to 5 ratio and exposed for 20 seconds, so instead of the angle I posted earlier which was a 1 to 1 ratio and at 10 feet from the lens it had a 10 ft field of view this particular camera would have a 50 ft field of view 30 feet from the lens or if 3 miles away it would be five miles wide and an even greater distance to travel before leaving the frame than I had previously speculated.

[bagster]

I know. I've been on these threads a while now. I understand the deeper rules. I just try to persevere.

"The burned hand teaches best."

John Jumper, Chlly MacIntosh, Buffalo Hump, and Jim Pockmark, and me, Jack Black.

Bagster

[little jeremiah]

Imperator Rex, too.

[grey_whiskers]

@Jack Black:

No, *you* think logically, Swamp-boi.

Q has been chased off 4-chan before now; in the early days, _something_ about Q's authentication got compromised, and someone from the other side made fun of one of his code strings, alleging it was a technical term related to model railroad track gauges (or something similar, I don't feel like looking it up at the moment).

Q's *FIRST* response was "Did they get to you, CodeMonkey?" followed shortly by a curt, terse communication: "Board compromised."

Q's next announcement a bit later was that he was the only and legitimate Q, and would forthwith CEASE communicating on that board -- which would prove things were still secure (i.e., a bad guy, could at that point, easily falsify Q entirely by posting) -- but that *didn't* happen.

Q also mentioned Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs -- the Seven Dwarfs apparently being CIA-owned/run supercomputers used to try to break Q's electronic security (presumably they were specialized computers used in cryptography).

And there were later messages about "rig for silent running" and "if we go silent do not panic. Realize that we are in control etc."

So Q is *very* concerned with keeping his / her / their identity(ies) remain hidden for now. Whether for fear of [187], blackmail, kidnapping, calumny, I don't know. But you're acting like Q is solely concerned with proving legitimacy to swamp-dwellers; and, at that, doing so according to desiderata which *you* have defined. Ones which (quelle surprise!) would render Q ineffective at his strategy, and make him/her/them far more easily neutralized.

Learn Q's comms.

[GYPSY286]

Have you ever listened to Denzel Washington speeches at commencements? He is a God-fearing man. I trust him.

[grey_whiskers]

It's spelled and pronounced dayyum.

I think that's how they actually say it down in Tuh-Hay-EXX-iss.

[grey_whiskers]

It's spelled and pronounced dayyum.

I think that's how they actually say it down in Tuh-HAY-Ex-iss.

[Melian]

That’s the video! Thank you so much!

Roseanne was the First Follower of Q, but she paid dearly for it. We need a second follower, someone influential, to help Q spread the word.

[Fractal Trader]

So explain to me why there are zero other sightings, especially of the naked eye type. These missiles are quite loud, too, and no one reported that, either. All in a crowded metropolitan area - 5 million people!

Radar logs were examined in a quick fashion that gave no one time to scour the logs. No reported radar sightings and nothing mentioned on ATC radios, by pilots or controllers.

At any given time there would be hundreds, if not thousands, of people looking at live Flight Radar data in the immediate vicinity, and recording it, roo. Not a peep from them, either.

[EasySt]

That is what it looks like, isn’t it?

[generally]

I was thinking the same thing. I’ve used Eclipse extensively.

But the way the other posts were talking about it, I thought it was something else entirely. A different piece of software with the same name?

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Lol, much needed I believe.

[Snowybear]

Most likely. Unless someone is failing miserably.