Q Anon: 07/03/18 "Trust The Plan"

bookmark

Sad but true, this horrible plan is entirely consistent with the morals of progressivism.

This is probably old news, but I found it the hard way, on a map.

Post 869 location is Canton Rd & Nelson Street, Hong Kong. Post 1680 location is Portland & Hamilton, Hong Kong (photo taken prior to Jan 2017). These two locations are within a few blocks of each other.

I believe Snowden (probably) is facing the camera on the sidewalk at the right edge of the street photo in 1680. Assuming he was staying at Canton & Nelson, he was close to home.

Forgot to include that 869 was taken from the Langham Place Building, if that matters.

Check YOU out, you weaponized autist you.

:)

Bagster

Correct...
For Clarity,

ES=Eric Schmidt
@Snowden=Eric Snowden

Since the Awans got off practically Scot free, HOW THE HELL IS THIS DRAINING THE SWAMP???? I am so frustrated and sad for our country.

Very distorted but could it be PW? Subject too old perhaps.

Looks like Obama crossing the street!

Wonder what he’s doing there.

Yay Mairdie! Very nice!

Snowden with a shaved head for disguise.

Excellent thread header, Mairdie.

Well Done!

In Q post 1677 he says "Do reflections violate NatSec rules?"

He's been speaking about mirrors, reflections, the handling of classified information a lot lately. Also questioning why the players still maintain their security clearances.

Well in scrolling through old drops, I found this one from 4/20, drop #1200.

!xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 5a1150 No.1116309 📁 Apr 20 2018 12:47:29 (EST) Anonymous ID: 10fbb7 No.1116269 📁 Apr 20 2018 12:44:41 (EST) >>1116248 Bait. Anonymous ID: 9237d9 No.1116276 📁 Apr 20 2018 12:45:09 (EST) >>1116248 Amazing. They are literally opening the door for you to drop all the information as evidence in a court of law. WWG1WGA >>1116269 They fall for it every single time. >>1116276 How do you ‘legally’ ……. Q

So Q has been prompting us for some time. Mirror, reflection... In order for the masses to fully appreciate the depth of the evil and corruption, we will have to be exposed to classified information. That's the delimna. How much can be revealed before we jeopardize our current intelligence gathering capabilities and assets and yet still educate the public while gaining convictions of these deep state operatives? And while we have seen reflections of the corruption evidence, we haven't truly seen the actual evidence. This is fascinating stuff.

Who is the HK man? Beats me!!

Me too. The chin and the the brows could almost convince me it is a thinly-disguised John F-in' K. And I'm not all that sure that the person to look at isn't the wild-haired, paunchy guy shuffling over in the direction of "Western Pacific Kindergarten."

Clueless, I am.

My thought exactly. Pacific ..... Kindergarten...

Balding middle aged man...

Pedo..

HK Pic = ES

$~~~THE ORACLE~~~$

~~~ [RR]'s right hand man at DOJ, Scott Schools, who oversees the Mueller probe, abruptly resigns from DOJ. Hmmmmm.

~~~ FReeQ Future Useless Eater had this to say in post #1978 about the "470" number referenced by Q several times.

"470th Military Intelligence Brigade, located in San Antonio Texas."

He made a good case that the "470" that Q has referenced several times is not Huber/Horowitz' 470 staff members as most had thought, but was reference to the 470th Military Intelligence Brigade. What a brilliant connection. Great job, FUE. (and if you got it from 8chan, good job nerds. But FUE brought it to us when nobody else did.) See his post for a more complete explanation.

~~~ Aquamarine made a nice pick-up from a yesterday Q post.

"Divide they try. Fail they will."
~ Q

"David Margolis, who was known as the "Yoda" of the department."
~ Article

"The “Yoda” quote in the Q drop was in connection to David Margolis."
~ Aquamarine.

Clever, neh?

~~~ Imran Awan, the Pakistani spy and butt-buddy of DWS who stole Congressional secrets received a "plea deal" which resulted in a conviction for a low level bank fraud charge.

It should be noted that news of this plea deal set off a cacaphony of lamenttions, wailing, and a gnashing of teeth aginst Jeff Sessions, the DOJ, and the fairness of all things holy.

Don't worry, my hearties. All is well and Q will set your mind at ease. He was quick to put out the fire. The plan continues apace. Trust it.

~~~ July 4, 2018. HAPPY BIRTHDAY, AMERICA!!!

Let's see what Qanon has to say about all this.

#1671
An anon posts a tweet from some dude about Imran Awan's plea deal and said that it SEEMS to say that he can't be charged with any previous non-violent crimes.

Q says of that,

Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

This post is meant to set minds at ease who have lost faith over the plea deal and the perceived lack of justice for crimes and corruption we KNOW took place. First, we are chastised to "think logically" and then asked "What's missing?" and to think about the IG report.

What's missing is the Awan server. A case that will implicate senior elected officials (treason) would not be litigated in that setting and is being handled by "the appropriate office."

But wait, there's more.

#1672
Oh, about that missing server? Q posts a Trump tweet that has him kvetching about the Awan case and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. He finally asks in the tweet, "They want to make a plea deal to hide what is on their server. Where is server.?"

Our man Q responds,

Logical thinking.
Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?
The result today is re: BANK FRAUD.
See last.
Connect.
The SWAMP is being DRAINED.

Again with the logic. This is a sure sign that Q is frustrated that we don't get it and lose heart so easily. Do we trust the plan or not?

Q spells out for us nervous nellies that the Awan plea deal was for a charge of BANK FRAUD ONLY. And a low level one at that. Lying on a home mortgage application. Hello?

One FReeQ said the case was filed under bank fraud to keep Awan in the country. There is merit in that. But I think the stronger reason other more serious charges (treason for bigger fish) were not filed is that, as he pointed out, the charges are being handled by other "appropriate offices.

And there is double jeopardy to take into account as well. Awan will most likely be pinned down by the terms of his deal in America and dealt with later, along with those above him.

There is also the possibility that he is cooperating.

This post is connected to the last post on Awan and Q tells us that "The swamp is being drained."

#1673
An anon "lawfag" yammers on about the Awan case. Q posts a link to the DOJ 2054. Synopsis Of Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA)

https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2054-synopsis-classified-information-procedures-act-cipa

This contains the rules for handling cases, including this,

"After a criminal indictment becomes public, the prosecutor remains responsible for taking reasonable precautions against the unauthorized disclosure of classified information during the case."

In order to prosecute cases connected to Awan, the DOJ must ensure that classified information is not disclosed. Trying Awan on the more serious charges would have compromised classified information on other cases. Simple as that?

It's all starting to add up and it's becoming clear why Awan was handled the way he's been handled thus far. Yes?

Q says of this link, "Matters of National Security." Pretty clear.

#1674
Q posts; Add another to the list.

https://www.npr.org/2018/07/03/625581627/another-top-justice-department-lawyer-steps-down-following-earlier-departures
CONSPIRACY?
COINCIDENCE?

The article is another Deep State resignation, this time from the DOJ. [RR]'s right hand man and the guy overlooking the Mueller investigation, Scott Schools, resigned. The article tries to paint it as routine and not connected to our current drama, but we know better, don't we?

Q asks, "Conspiracy? Coincidence?"

Schools is most likely a deepie and part of the conspiracy. Q asks "coincidence?" when he's pointing out a Q proof. Was this predicted by Q in the past? Is it part of the whole reshuffling of the DOJ that would replace [RR] with a Trump loyalist that Q has outlined?

Chances are good.

#1675
An anon posts a #Qanon meme showing Trump heading toward Helicopter One, with the words, "I'm off to save the world. Aren't you coming?"

Then Q posts a photo of a sideways lamp and a bright light up against a wall and some blinds. What,what, what could this mean? The photo is entitled,"Welcome aboard." The fun is just beginning. Stand by.

#1676
Q posts a quote from some article (unknown by the Oracle). It talks about the Schools' DOJ resignation and the man he replaced;

"...David Margolis, who was known as the "Yoda" of the department. When Margolis died, DOJ brass asked Schools to come back to Washington to try to fill those shoes."

Then Q says,

"Divide they try.
Fail they will."
Everything has meaning.

Q is not only telling us that the removal of Schools was a loss for the Deep State, but he was also making a comment with his "going full Yoda" speech pattern (hat tip: Aquamarine).about "Yoda" Margolis. Something about Margolis being nicknamed Yoda (and his death?) has meaning. What is it?

#1677
Back to the photos. A helpful anon right-side-ups and stretches the previous Q photo of the light on the wall and lamp. He sets it next to a photo of The Donald sitting at his desk on Air Force One. The Q light/lamp photo appears to match up exactly with the features of the Trump at desk photo. The anon says, "Huh."

Q says,

Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).

The 'Twitter' phone is a reference to one of the two phones that were recently outted in the media that Trump uses. One for "Tweets" and one for other business. Q acknowledges this and implies that the "Twitter" phone was most likely used to take the light/lamp photo. Or it could have been used for it's reflective apple insignia on the back to create the Apple shaped reflection onthe wall of Air Force One.

Q asks if reflections violated National Security rules. Answer, "no." Maybe photos taken of the President on Air Force One do?

Where must one be to take that reflected picture? Short answer; in the office on Air Force One. Long answer; though the Oracle is no photofag or scientist, perhaps sitting in what I've come to refer to as, the "Q chair." More later.

The helpful anon has distorted (stretched) and repositioned the photo to make it fit the office.

#1678 An anon posts a photo of an Apple phone and says he took a picture of the back of it with it's reflective Apple insignia. He asks if this is what Trump was doing with the previous lamp/light pic AND those weird close-up pictures of what we thought to be Trumps partial face some time ago.

Q makes no comment.

Anwers; yes and maybe.

#1678
Now an anon posts another distored and stretched photo of the light/lamp and places it in the Air Force One office and it matches up EXACTLY with the features of the office. Then anon says, ""welcome aboard.jpg" is a lie."

Not sure what the lie is. It looks to me like the original lamp/light photo was taken in the Presidential Office aboard Air Force One. Sarcasm?

#1679
An anon posts a meme and comments on the increased "shill" activity by the Deep State.

Q responds, and get this. There is an awesome theory contained within.

Trolling is fun.
Hussein/Trump interior = identical minus small changes.
(World) news in rear literally placed same prior to each departure.
Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook.
Enjoy!

Whos is Q trolling? Not us. So it could only be the enemy, the Deep State. He then talks about the Hussein/Trump interior (of Air Force One) being identical MINUS SMALL CHANGES.

"(World) news in rear" refers to the laptop in the rear of the photo on the desk that the President uses to keep track of events. Q points out that items are placed "literally the same" prior to the President's use of the office. Notice the laptop is placed as if it's to be used from the President's side of the desk.

Notice the big chair on the other side of the desk by the laptop. Edzo4 found other photos with other Presidents that showed somebody sitting in that chair and using the computer. Who they were? Who cares. The Oracle believes that Q is showing us his work station while he sits next to the President in flight as they both concoct the very posts we've been reading all this time (some of them).

That's a pretty interesting theory, right? But check THIS one out.

The "mug holders" (coasters, to you and me) are normally placed, before the President's arrival, behind the President near the lamp (the one in the light/lamp pic. See the Obama photo of him sitting at the same desk which edzo provided.)

In the photo of The Donald sitting at the desk, there are two "mug holders" sitting next to the laptop. Since Q is saying, "trolling is fun" and that the "placing of the mug holders near the lamp (moving the holders that were near the lamp)" to a position on the desk was the "hook" for the troll, the Oracle is declaring that the "mug holders" are a troll to Obama and the Deep State.

How is that a troll? Remember. The Hussein/Trump interiors are the same "MINUS SMALL CHANGES." What are those "small changes?"

The listening devices have been removed from the mug holders. BOOM.

Evidence that a previous President bugged an incoming President? How long after the bugs were discovered was disinformation "leaked" through these, and other, listening devices?

Hey Hussein. You been trolled! How you like the Donald now? Hahahahaha.

How's that theory, O my brothers and sisters? Thank FReeQ Generally for developing it.

Remember too. Just a theory. But I really like this one.

#1679
Here we go again. Shades of Snowden (or is it server). It's a photo of a United Airplane taken from inside a room through blinds.

Nothing further.

#1680
A repost of the photo titled, "United" and a photo titled, "United_HK_IDEN_T3902" of which Q asks, "Who do you see?"

The title of the second photo ties it to the attached "United" photo and HK screams "Hong Kong." FReeQ TrueFact has identifed the location down to an address in Hong Kong (great job). There are three people in the middle of the street, one guy off to the left on the sidewalk, and a couple of heads popping up here and there. So, who of those are we supposed to identify?

Some have guessed Eric Schmidt of Google, Snowden, and CIA. No definitive answer as of yet. We do know that the street scene is connected to the United flight.

And with that, our journey ends. There was some good stuff tonight. Q is becoming more brazen with his proofs and we finally got our promised "inside Air Force One" photo proof, with bonus material added.

The adventure continues tomorrow, sportsfans. See ya 'round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.

Oh, p.s.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, AMERICA!

Bagster

HK Pic = ES

If so, the RQ is on a head down, wattle-concealing, act inconspicuous stroll.