Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 6/29/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops
qanon.pub ^ | 6/29/2018 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 06/29/2018 10:40:30 PM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 2,281-2,298 next last
To: greeneyes
"Cooper said in the 1990s that they were going to allow illegal guns to be smuggled in"

and remember one of the many early scandals Toons administration had that got NO attention from the DBM is that several hundred illegal guns were found on a Chinese container ship in San Fran, ready to be unloaded....

anyone remember this?

661 posted on 06/30/2018 9:37:38 PM PDT by cherry (official troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Opps!

The next question to him should have been (NOT)POTUS HRC or POTUS DJT or POTUS BHO?

JUST WHAT POTUS WERE YOU INVESTIGATING?


662 posted on 06/30/2018 9:45:54 PM PDT by EasySt (Truth will Prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I think that new formate is wonderful!


663 posted on 06/30/2018 9:51:01 PM PDT by Melian (Patriots fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.; bitt; bagster; SkyPilot; Swordmaker; JockoManning; TEXOKIE
Hey - here’s something - in Strzok testimony:

PS “While emotional over the election, I conduct myself w/ upmost integrity w/o bias while undertaking any such investigation, especially a high-profile case against the POTUS.”

A HIGH PROFILE CASE ***AGAINST THE POTUS*** ?????

I thought it was supposed to be against Russia!

Good catch of a Freudian slip.

Shove it up his donkey, sideways!

664 posted on 06/30/2018 9:55:25 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

#665


665 posted on 06/30/2018 9:59:59 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Reclaiming My Time
666 posted on 06/30/2018 10:01:02 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47

.


667 posted on 06/30/2018 10:01:14 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

Meow, baby.


668 posted on 06/30/2018 10:04:02 PM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Oh, they have said that Trump is not under investigation many times. But as their fake investigation collapses, they are frantically trying to claim it’s an investigation against Trump, so when Mueller is fired/removed from position they can claim it’s to “silence” Mueller. The MSM is helping them every step of the way.

On the DummicraticUnderground website, some are rabid in their assertions that Mueller has a massive, FANTASTIC case (that he just hasn’t presented to anyone yet) and that it’s taken more than a year because the corruption re Trump is so “deep” and “vast” etc. They are always picking up what we say about Hillary (deep, vast, and decades of corruption) and then just applying it to Trump like, we won’t notice.

The Deep State ran out of ideas a long time ago in terms of how to defeat Trump. They like Trump’s strategies so well, they are trying to use them against him, because they have nothing.


669 posted on 06/30/2018 10:06:08 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Comes out perfectly on my phone, I vote yes! Not a fan of that color and not sure why, hospital color?! Great job as usual!


670 posted on 06/30/2018 10:06:10 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47
Look at the post of mine you replied to.

Now look at the post # of the one *after* that.

I was reserving a spot, or, as it says, "Reclaiming Her Time."

671 posted on 06/30/2018 10:06:20 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
National Review and multiple other news sources and legal scholars claim that

a) Sessions relied on career Obama appointees in his decision to recuse himself, and

b) the wrong law was cited - 28CFR45.2 does not include the counterintelligence investigation which was neither a known crime nor an active criminal investigation against the Trump campaign.

Sessions would not be any more conflicted if he stayed in place than Rosenweasel who recommended Trump firing of Comey, then launched the Mueller persecution to investigate Trump's obstruction of justice by firing Comey.

Rosenweasel is now a supervisor and a witness in the phony concept of obstruction of justice for Trump exercising the ability to fire any FBI Director he wants.

672 posted on 06/30/2018 10:08:12 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

As soon as the Trump campaign investigation was announced Sessions would have had to recuse himself.


673 posted on 06/30/2018 10:21:44 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: generally
No. I didn’t see that. When did he say that?

Cool! The BC?

Sorry but just a couple of thoughts as to what would be nice to release.

674 posted on 06/30/2018 10:25:11 PM PDT by spokeshave2 (Formerly as spokeshave...now restarted after computer issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

ahhhhhhhhhhh.. good catch!!!


675 posted on 06/30/2018 10:44:00 PM PDT by bitt (t\\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

ahhhhhhhhhhh.. good catch!!!


676 posted on 06/30/2018 10:44:00 PM PDT by bitt (t\\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

re: Kamala Harris
If you don’t want to read smutty rumors, don’t go there..

http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/06/blind-item-8_29.html


677 posted on 06/30/2018 10:52:00 PM PDT by bitt (t\\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

re: Kamala Harris
If you don’t want to read smutty rumors, don’t go there..

http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/06/blind-item-8_29.html


678 posted on 06/30/2018 10:52:00 PM PDT by bitt (t\\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Lovely smutty rumors. They’ll never let her get national. She can stay California, as they won’t have a problem with that there.


679 posted on 06/30/2018 11:11:28 PM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; StormFlag; TEXOKIE; CPT Clay; buffaloguy; grey_whiskers; Wingy; bitt; Shady; ...
$~~~THE ORACLE~~~$

Today's events were defined by heavy troll activity and a relatively low number of Q posts, most of which were easily decipherable. Here are some of the top stories the Oracle is following.

~~~ The President tweeted that he will interview with Maria "Goodbody" Baritromo tomorrow, Sunday @ 1000. He advised us to "enjoy" which is much like Q's advice to "enjoy the show." This Oracle wonders if MB will ask DJT the "ultimate question." Let's tune in and see.

~~~ A most excellent "PROOF OF Q" was discovered by the most excellent FReeQ, LiveFreeOrDie2001.

Yesterday's "POTUS_Shedule" tweet contained the words, "The TRUTH is spreading, we are the majority."

https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1012833945879277576

The words in the tweet match up with a Q post from the night before..

(Partial Q post #1644 from last night.)

We are the majority (growing).
Q

I'll say again. EXCELLENT find, Detective! Catch 'o the day. You know how I LOVE Q proofs.

~~~ LiveFreeOrDie and TEXOKIE dug deep on the Ramos shooter guy's therapist and turned up a lot of good stuff. See the thread for details. Nice work, detectives.

~~~ There was a troll infestation, as two familiar trolls decided to make a last ditch effort to convince us that we are fools for following Q. One of the trolls is even a spy with high level security clearance. Beware, he may be a Larp.

And in walked Q (and Q+)

#1645 Q+ posts an inspirational message. The link is to a video production of a Ronald Reagan speech, and is most excellentay

Play LOUD.
Be PROUD!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JDVT-8tUfiE
FIGHT for what is RIGHT!
FIGHT for FREEDOM!
They will not win.
Divide they try.
Fail they will.
TOGETHER.
WWG1WGA!

#1646 Q posts these words;

You have a choice.
The choice has always been yours.
POWER TO THE PEOPLE.

Followed by a laundry list of what the Deep State wants (to divide us and more) and all the things they are doing to get what they want, from promoting war to Antifa level street violence, and they are using the media and Hollywood to get what they want.

He posted the video that "would get Trump elected."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ

He ends by telling us that they (Q/POTUS) are ready, with the Preamble to the Constitution, and with these words, ""Be on your guard; stand firm in the faith; be courageous; be strong."

It seems, with those two posts right out of the gate and in a row, that he is setting the stage for something. I again refer yu to the President's interview on FOX news tomorrow morning. Just saying.

#1647 Q reposts the long list of FBI and DOJ personnel who have been removed from position in one way or another. He says of it,

Think logically.
Ask yourself - is this normal?
Conspiracy?

No, this is not normal. Is Q saying, by "Conspiracy?" that those people were involved in a conspiracy, say, to take down the President? Or is he saying that if so much Draining of the DOJ/FBI swamp is abnormal, can the Q operation be a conspiracy theory? I believe the latter, but it could go either way.

#1648 A repost of his last and then a repost of another previous post with a long list of politicians not seeking re-election or resigning. The old post contains the questions, "Conspiracy? Nothing happening?"

He then says, again, "Think logically.Ask yourself - is this normal? Conspiracy? "

Again, no. Not normal. And this "draining of the swamp" is an indication that the whole "trust Sessions, trust the plan, Q thing" is not a conspiracy.

#1649 This is Q's only post of the day that is puzzling and a bit of a mystery. An anon asks about "he who must not be named" (Senator McCain) and if he will be "held accountable."

Q responds,

Think SC vote to confirm (coming).
No Name action.
Every dog has its day.
Enjoy the show.

While this would seem to indicate that, yes, he will be held accountable, the Oracle could not see, nor was any plausible explanation offered in FReeQville, of how his holding to account is or will be connected to the upcoming Supreme Court nomination vote.

But the possibilities sound delicious.

#1650 An anon says, "GO GOWDY!!!" to which Q responds, "It will not be Gowdy."

The Oracle recalls that, just a few short days ago, Q had asked if they should "add Gowdy to the list" of potential Supreme Court nominees. It seems that, since that time, Q is now saying that the President has made his selection and that Gowdy is not that selection.

The Oracle, a big fan of Gowdy, though not sure if he is being run out of office or picked for a pivotal role in MAGA, thinks that Q's floating him as a Supreme Court nominee, though not selected, indicates he might be a good guy after all. We will see where Gowdy lands and that will tell the tale.

And that was the end of a relatively short and easily inpterpreted Q day.

Let's try not to "feed the trolls" tomorrow as much as we did today. The Oracle includes himself in that admonition.

Until then, sportsfans, see ya 'round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.

Bagster

680 posted on 06/30/2018 11:14:42 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 2,281-2,298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson