Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing unveils rendering of hypersonic jet that would fly from US to Japan in 3 hours
cnbc ^ | 06/26/2018 | Phil Lebaue

Posted on 06/26/2018 4:49:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The hypersonic passenger plane could, in theory, fly as fast as Mach 5, or just under 3,900 miles per hour. That would allow the plane to carry passengers between Los Angeles and Tokyo in roughly three hours. A flight from New York to London could be as quick as two hours. Right now, those flights take about 11 hours and 7 hours, respectively.

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg is pushing the aerospace giant to explore the potential of ultra-fast passenger planes.

"I think in the next decade or two you're going to see them become a reality," Muilenburg told CNBC at the Paris Air Show last year. “We see future innovations where you could connect around the world in about two hours.”

How will Boeing and other aerospace companies build passenger planes that can safely fly between far-flung locations in just a few hours? The key will be the development of lightweight materials for the fuselage and new engines that will propel the jets at greater speeds. All of that will take years to be designed and tested.

Then there is the question of cost. How willing is Boeing to potentially spend billions of dollars over the next 20 to 30 years to build a hypersonic passenger plane? If the jet is built, will the costs be low enough to make it a profitable plane for airlines to fly on a regular basis?


(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2018 4:49:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

How can Boeing afford it?

Get government support. A hypersonic object with the mass of an airliner is an awesome weapon as well as prompt transport. Russia has invested heavily in this area, or at least bragged about it. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US had some projects in this area already, as well.


2 posted on 06/26/2018 4:53:03 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

OK, have been seeing renderings of these things all my life....
Build one already!!


3 posted on 06/26/2018 4:53:09 PM PDT by Ragnar Danneskjöld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
A hypersonic object with the mass of an airliner is an awesome weapon

I strongly suspect that is what's behind this.

4 posted on 06/26/2018 4:53:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It sometimes seems some new take on the old Boeing SST is trotted out every few years.


5 posted on 06/26/2018 4:58:35 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjöld

Building one isn’t the problem.

Selling ten is.


6 posted on 06/26/2018 4:59:30 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Boom Supersonic already has more than 74 orders for it’s futuristic SST.


7 posted on 06/26/2018 5:01:31 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjöld

Exactly. My daughter could produce a nice drawing of such a thing, but it would be no nearer reality than her drawings of space-travelling dragons.


8 posted on 06/26/2018 5:04:37 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Fill in my standard rant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When they have a failure its gonna be that much more fast and spectacular.


9 posted on 06/26/2018 5:06:17 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
My understanding is that regulations intended to combat noise (sonic booms) are huge factor behind the stagnation in commercial aerospace speed over the last 50 years. Does Boeing have a plan to address the sonic boom issue? Also, the Concorde was expensive to maintain and operate, and its high fares proved fatal when travel dipped post 9/11.

With all that said, I'd love to see this sort of thing really happen. It's sad how little innovation has happened in commercial aerospace during the last 60 years compared to the 60 years before that.
10 posted on 06/26/2018 5:06:25 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Space-traveling dragons? Now that’s what I’m talkin’ bout. You need to have her contact the new Space Force. Only thing better might be space-traveling Ligers.

She sounds like a Freeper in training.


11 posted on 06/26/2018 5:12:16 PM PDT by PlateOfShrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I don’t know where this screwball idea came from but the proposed aircraft certainly won’t be hypersonic at ground level.


12 posted on 06/26/2018 5:12:42 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PlateOfShrimp

Communication that involves typing is too old-fashioned for today’s youth.


13 posted on 06/26/2018 5:14:37 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Fill in my standard rant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar Danneskjöld

Concorde is a British-French turbojet-powered supersonic passenger airliner that was operated from 1976 until 2003. It had a maximum speed over twice the speed of sound at Mach 2.04 (1,354 mph or 2,180 km/h at cruise altitude), with seating for 92 to 128 passengers.


14 posted on 06/26/2018 5:15:43 PM PDT by donna (The United States Constitution and the Koran are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

“Building one isn’t the problem.
Selling ten is.”

Yeh, the technology to build a large supersonic passenger plane has been in place for awhile now. The trick is building one that can operate at a profit. That technology has yet to prove itself to exist....


15 posted on 06/26/2018 5:19:36 PM PDT by snoringbear (W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just make sure there aren’t any pieces of metal on the runway at takeoff.


16 posted on 06/26/2018 5:20:13 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Forget that. We should build a high-speed train to Japan. It can go under or over the ocean, and the governor of California can head up the project, as he has valuable experience with these things.


17 posted on 06/26/2018 5:23:28 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Keepin' it analog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I think Spacex will beat them with a pure rocket solution. They have already demonstrated the technology.


18 posted on 06/26/2018 5:25:27 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlateOfShrimp

19 posted on 06/26/2018 5:29:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Ping.


20 posted on 06/26/2018 5:30:25 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson