Thanks for the info but I was just pointing out where it previously has happened where you requested. I also pointed out my stance on military tribunals. I do understand the need to be cautious with them.
If the treason is as bad as Q has stated it is, especially if they can prove there was a real coordinated effort to take down our republic, then I won’t rule them out.
CGato
Q
Fair enough. The person I challenged to put up a cite put up the same one, so I'd been around that barn earlier in the thread. Thought that adding Hamdi, especially Scalia's dissent, clarified the issue in a contemporary setting.
-- If the treason is as bad as Q has stated it is, especially if they can prove there was a real coordinated effort to take down our republic, then I won't rule them out. --
Understood. Yours is a popular view. I think it is misguided, or at best, not well defended in light of case law and long standing principles. The seriousness and magnitude of the charge or conspiracy is not sufficient justification, without more.