Q Anon: (3/16/18) Continued from Tuesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/16/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This is a shout out to all the Anons who have worked so hard for months on the Q boards to bake Q's drops for us. THANQ, Anons!.

The Q team doesn't like it when they receive praise, but hey, they don't have time to read websites (FR) and besides, they can't stop me!

THANQ, Q!!!!
It just needed to be said.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3639519/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3639029/posts?page=23#23

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

[Cboldt]

-- Any ideas on why the Q posts were removed? --

This happened once before. greatawkening was wiped out, and "regular anons" were allowed to post in there. At the time there was speculation we'd seen the last of Q, at least in that role. That speculation proved false, Q resumed posting in the same places (greatawakening and qresearch) a few days later.

I think removal of the posts is done to draw attention. I think leaving the 2016 Trump campaign speech behind is to cause it to remain in view.

Maybe Q will resume posting at greatawkening, or maybe at dayofreckoning.

My take is Q sees "now" as a meaningful marker point in the process or revealing and dealing with "everything involved." What the significance of this point is in "the plan," no way to know, only speculation.

[SteveH]

Hmm you are right

Well it is just a rumor anyway

[little jeremiah]

Thank you for your thoughts. Sounds very reasonable.

[Billyv]

His requests if true will lead to spiderwebs of bad guys. Also if true, gives top cover to search and destroy all else with the cover of Trump fever.

This is also why the BC/HRC investigations at FBI are in Little Rock office. It all goes back to Whitewater and all of the previous hush-mouthed Arkansas Clinton appointees are out of office with no top cover.

[stars & stripes forever]

[Sounds just like regular ferals’ violence.]

2nd shooting in a month. Chicago gangs have moved into the area.

[Pearls Before Swine]

It is an open question whether or not a US citizen enemy combatant taken in the US can be kept out of the civil court system, but the likely answer to that is "they cannot."

I think it depends on who you ask, and the conditions on the day you ask it. You're probably right, under the current situation of apparent order, at least on the surface.

[rolling_stone]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason_laws_in_the_United_States

[Billyv]

Like a dog returning to its vomit, HRC will lead to her handlers.

[little jeremiah]

I’m not familiar with that part of the country, but now that I know it’s near Chicago, I am sure it is just standard ferals’ behavior.

[little jeremiah]

Definition: In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the US, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. Conviction requires two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2]

Penalty: U.S. Code Title 18: Death,[8] or not less than 5 years imprisonment and not more than life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (minimum fine of $10,000, if not sentenced to death).[9][10]

Interesting about the two witnesses; IIRC Q mentioned something about one or more phone black hats' calls that were being listened to by two people. Witnesses....

Maybe someone else remembers more about this.

[Billyv]

Until next time! LOL!

[bagster]

I like it. You didn't miss nothing by having no sound. Just mucic. I noticed there was no Shephard Smith in that promo.

Hahaha.

p.s. It IS about to get real.

[bagster]

Until next time! LOL!

I know, right?

:)

[Cboldt]

See the Rumsfeld v. Padilla cases. When it was headed up to SCOTUS for review on the merits, Bush took Padilla out of the military justice system and mooted the case.

The Supreme Court Goes to War:Hamdi, Padilla, and Rasul

Moreover, although Justice Breyer provided the key fifth vote in favor of the authority to detain Hamdi, he also joined in full Justice Stevens's dissent in Padilla-where the majority ducked the merits of Padilla's detention on a technicality, holding that Padilla should have filed in South Carolina, rather than New York. In addition to dissenting on the procedural point, Justice Stevens emphasized that the dissenters "believe that the Non-Detention Act prohibits-and the [AUMF] does not authorize-the protracted, incommunicado detention of American citizens arrested in the United States." Along with Justice Breyer (who joined the dissent in Padilla) and Justice Scalia (whose dissent in Hamdi should have applied a fortiori to the merits of Padilla's detention), that meant that, on the merits, there were at least five votes for Padilla.

Such tea-leaf-reading may help to explain why, when Padilla's case came back to the Court, the Bush Administration mooted it by having Padilla indicted on criminal charges. ...

I seriously doubt Trump is going to invoke military tribunals against any of the perps in the soft coup attempt. Doing so is a substantial (maybe all CAPS would make the point properly_ hurdle, more than a loud distraction, but a real risk of being booted and also found, by the public, to be unreasonably heavy-handed. It would be a captial S stupid move.

[bagster]

Like a dog returning to its vomit, HRC will lead to her handlers.

She already did. Lynn Rothschild was walking down the stairs behind the unstable C word.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Thanks for the background on those cases.

Also, I agree with your conclusion, for now. That was why I also said “under current, stable circumstances.”

Some of the wilder talk on these Q-threads goes into the possibility of widespread hot insurrection if the hammer comes down on all of the people in the leftist conspiracy. Under “hot” conditions, I postulate that all bets are off—the courts wouldn’t have the bandwidth to handle all cases in the full glory of precedent and procedural detail.

[No_Doll_i]

LoL That sounds like a great time!

[Steven W.]

WITNESSES: Shooting at CherryVale Mall following 6 person fight http://www.mystateline.com/news/active-police-investigation-at-cherryvale-mall/1056244815

How many more of these were there yesterday?

Deadly shooting at Thousand Oaks mall called murder, attempted suicide

Pursuit Ends in Fatal Police Shooting Near Doors of San Diego County Casino

[little jeremiah]

There weren’t any words? It looked as though people were talking!

[No_Doll_i]

Thank you!