Posted on 03/11/2018 6:03:22 AM PDT by Fzob
At no point did Nevada try and assert any rights over that land, probably because for most of its history the land was considered of little or no value. If now some value is found in that land for cattle grazing, mining, housing, etc. then any attempt by Nevada to gain control can be seen as just a greedy land grab.
A wise man speaketh.. :)
The 17th was the result of "let's figure out a way to take advantage of the power of direct taxation".
Thanks for the ping. Interesting reading.
No problem.
I didn’t see them.
“If you hadnt noticed, the current asshats are changing the Constitution”
First, I don’t think they really know how to change it. Second, they’re not willing to do the work that’s required. They’re feeble minded.
>
At no point did Nevada try and assert any rights over that land, probably because for most of its history the land was considered of little or no value. If now some value is found in that land for cattle grazing, mining, housing, etc. then any attempt by Nevada to gain control can be seen as just a greedy land grab.
>
I must disagree w/ the last point. The Const. makes it quite clear on Federal ‘holdings’; just because the State has not pressed its rightful authority doesn’t make it moot.
IMO, in the creation of the State, borders were setup/agreed-upon, the land instantly reverted to the State where it lies.
Thanks for the ping. Got here a little late but good information few folks know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.