Posted on 03/11/2018 6:03:22 AM PDT by Fzob
The first 10 changes to the Constitution were easy. Since then, it has been an uphill battle every time, and some of those battles are, at least technically, still undecided.
We are speaking of the amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and those first 10 are, of course, better known as the Bill of Rights.
They provide some of the most important guarantees of freedom associated with the U.S. Constitution — even though they were added years after the Constitution was first written in the summer of 1787.
It wasn't that the framers of the Constitution didn't believe in freedom of the press or freedom of religion — or the right to own guns or have a fair trial.
They clearly did.
POLITICS White House Week: Hope Hicks, Kushner's Business, Trump Talks Trade
Listen· 3:59
Queue
Toggle more options SUBSCRIBE TO PODCAST But many, including influential framer James Madison, believed these rights were implicit in the Constitution itself (and in the constitutions of the individual states). Madison and others considered a separate catalog of rights unnecessary and potentially troublesome because of what it might omit.
In the process of ratifying that new Constitution 230 years ago, the founders got some pushback from the states. There was popular demand for spelling out citizens' freedoms and rights explicitly — so as to make them as clear and inviolable as the Constitution itself.
So, when the first Congress met in 1789, Madison himself (a member of the House from Virginia) brought forth a package of 12 amendments — formally introduced just six weeks after George Washington had taken the oath as the first president.
Repeal The Second Amendment? That's Not So Simple. Here's What It Would Take POLITICS Repeal The Second Amendment? That's Not So Simple. Here's What It Would Take These "further declaratory and restrictive clauses" were soon passed with two-thirds votes of the House and the Senate. Ten of these were ratified in short order by the states, making them part of the Constitution as of Dec. 15, 1791. But two of Madison's original dozen were left behind, failing to get the three-fourths of the states of the time.
One provided a formula for determining the number of seats in the House of Representatives, and the other said that congressional pay raises could not take effect until after the next election for the House.
The zombie amendment
These became what might be called orphan amendments, abandoned partway through the process. But Congress had included no expiration date on them, so they could also be called zombie amendments — kept in a suspended condition indefinitely, neither finally dead nor fully alive.
High Risk, High Reward For Trump's Meeting With North Korea's Kim Jong Un ANALYSIS High Risk, High Reward For Trump's Meeting With North Korea's Kim Jong Un In fact, one of those two early amendments, the one about the pay raise, actually came back to life. It was dusted off in the late 1980s — in the midst of a fracas over congressional pay — and states once again began voting on its ratification. Lo and behold, the necessary 38 states signed on, and, in 1992, the amendment that Congress had blessed way back in 1789, was finally ratified.
It is now the 27th Amendment to the Constitution, the last (or at least most recent) of the amendments and one of only two added in the past 50 years.
Altogether, the Constitution has only been amended 17 times since the Bill of Rights, and one of those amendments (the 21st) was done just to repeal another (the 18th, known as Prohibition).
Five amendments have dealt with presidential succession, elections or terms in office. A flurry of amendments after the Civil War abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection under the law and banned racial discrimination. A successor amendment in the 1960s banned the poll tax, often used to keep African-Americans from voting in states that once had slavery.
Other momentous amendments have granted women the right to vote (19th), lowered the voting age to 18 from 21 (26th), imposed the income tax (16th) and provided for the direct election of senators by the voters rather than by state legislatures (17th).
The Equal Rights Amendment that still hasn't been
But not all the amendments passed by Congress have stood the test of ratification by the states. Counting that very first item in Madison's package, there are six in all. Call them orphans, oddities or zombies, but considering how much time has passed, it is perhaps most amazing that there have been so few.
The best known of these in our time is the Equal Rights Amendment, which provided that "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex."
Billy Graham Walked A Line, And Regretted Crossing Over It, When It Came To Politics POLITICS Billy Graham Walked A Line, And Regretted Crossing Over It, When It Came To Politics It was the culmination of the women's rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s. Its bipartisan support carried it to two-thirds majorities in the House and Senate in the 1970s. It went out to the states in 1972 of states with a full head of steam. But the number of ratifying states stalled out at 35 — three short of the 38 required.
Eventually, the seven-year time frame Congress had set for ratification was extended by three years. But, by this point, a strong opposition movement had arisen, blocking ratification in the remaining states and persuading some state legislatures to reconsider and rescind their ratification.
One key element in this opposition was the Eagle Forum, led by Phyllis Schlafly, a prominent social conservative from Alton, Ill. She argued that the ERA could force unwanted changes on women who preferred their traditional roles. For example, Schlafly and others argued the ERA could subject women to a military draft.
Despite having a full decade to win ratification, the ERA fell short and expired in 1982.
Still taxation without representation
A similar fate befell the Voting Rights Amendment for the District of Columbia. Passed by Congress in 1978, it would have given citizens of the nation's capital city the same full representation in Congress as any state (one voting representative in the House and two senators).
This amendment, too, survived a battle in Congress, where some conservatives argued the Constitution had been wise to restrict D.C., so that it did not become an overly powerful center of national politics on the model of London or Paris. The states proved less than enthusiastic, and the seven-year expiration date Congress had added as part of the deal (as with the ERA) meant the amendment died in 1985.
Trump's Big Speech: More Pep Rally Than Bipartisan Breakthrough ANALYSIS Trump's Big Speech: More Pep Rally Than Bipartisan Breakthrough (It should be noted that another amendment, the 23rd, at least gave D.C. a chance to participate in the Electoral College with three electoral votes — just as it would have if it were a state. That amendment was ratified in 1961.)
For either of these amendments to go back to the states for another round of ratification votes, it would have to first be passed by two-thirds votes in the Congress. It is far from certain that either could surmount that hurdle in the current House and Senate.
Three other zombies that linger
There are three other amendments that remain in zombie space, as it were, as they have never been ratified by three-fourths of the states, but have never expired:
1. The oldest is the Titles of Nobility Amendment, first sent to the states in 1810 on the verge of the second war with Great Britain (to be known as the War of 1812). It provided that any American citizen who accepted or received any title of nobility from a foreign power (or accepted any gift from such a power without the consent of Congress) would forfeit his or her American citizenship.
This amendment came close to ratification, with a dozen states giving thumbs-up within two years. But there were 17 states as of 1803, so the Anti-Title Amendment fell short. No states have since joined in, but in the absence of an expiration clause, this amendment remains technically available.
The next of the zombies had a far shorter interval of viability but conjures a moment of maximum tension in U.S. history.
2. It was known as the Corwin Amendment after the Ohio congressman who proposed it, but it has been remembered as the Slavery Amendment.
Passed by Congress in 1861, on the eve of the Civil War, the Slavery Amendment sought to halt the secession movement by guaranteeing the federal government would not abolish slavery or otherwise interfere with the "domestic institutions of any state, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State."
It came too late to appease the seceding states, which would eventually number 11. But it was ratified by two of the slave-holding states that did not leave the Union. Needless to say, interest in this measure was superseded by the 1865 passage and ratification of the 13th Amendment, abolishing slavery and involuntary servitude. But technically, the Slavery Amendment has never expired and remains outstanding.
3. The latest of this group of still-pending amendments is the Child Labor Amendment, granting the Congress power to regulate the labor of children under the age of 18. It was ratified by 28 states, far short of the 36 required at the time. The last state to ratify did so in 1937, nearly a decade after Congress had passed this amendment, but none has signed on since, largely because other laws enacted since (principally the Fair Labor Standards Act) have accomplished much of the amendment's intent.
The 17th is the “Let’s just screw this whole thing up” amendment
That about sums it up.
“The 17th is the “Let’s just screw this whole thing up” amendment.”...........
The “Law Of Our Land”. This country and its Constitution has survived for a long, long time, even though there have been numerous attempts to completely void or disregard that document. Are there problem here in our country? Yes. Do we need to change that document? NO!!
If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.
Implicit in the right to life is the right to self-defense. A right that can’t be defended is a right in name only.
Repealing the 17th would return the function of the Senate back to its original intent.
They are preparing the ground for the coveted Leftist gadget play that will revive the ERA.
Could be, but in reality, they have everything they wanted in the ERA already.
Statehood-like representation for DC??? Absurd.
DC should NEVER have ANY permanent residents.
If you please, it would be helpful to your fellow FReepers to edit OUT the extraneous lines in your ‘cut&paste’ that are probably hyperlinks to other articles. Things like Trump & Kim and Billy Graham walking a line take away interest from valid talking points.
Thank you
I definitely don’t want any of the current crop of asshats tinkering with that masterpiece. They are not worthy or capable. Kill all the lawyers.
1. The oldest is the Titles of Nobility Amendment, first sent to the states in 1810 on the verge of the second war with Great Britain (to be known as the War of 1812). It provided that any American citizen who accepted or received any title of nobility from a foreign power (or accepted any gift from such a power without the consent of Congress) would forfeit his or her American citizenship.
Actually the way it was written it Stripped Citizenship and All rights from ANYONE that was a Member of a BAR Association, Yes LAWYERS!! No Voting, No holding ANY elected office. Lawyers are NOT licensed by the Government, they are licensed by a Private Organization and the Government requires that Private License.
see The Missing 13th Amendment
>
Repealing the 17th would return the function of the Senate back to its original intent.
>
Which would do exactly....squat.
The only time, in recent memory, the State(s) attempted to assert their (rightful) 9th/10th powers were in the civil rights era (not saying deseg. was good/proper) and recently in the (illegal) immigration battle.
Else, they have (illegally) absconded their roles to Fedzilla; like Congress has done to the Judicial, Executive and bureaucratic state.
Agreed. It also seems incredibly lazy.
Good article for Federalist/Anti-Federalist ping. It’s the first time I’ve encountered all this info in one place.
p
If you hadn’t noticed, the current asshats are changing the Constitution.
Great background on the zombie amendments.
I assume you support representative government.
Since the Constitution acts directly on both the people and the states, both must have a seat at the legislative table. It makes as much sense to deny the people a direct say in government . . . no sense at all.
Now the 17A is Constitutional, but like the 18A, it was a mistake, and a big one far worse than the 18A.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.