Posted on 02/28/2018 1:29:04 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3635315/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
We're having trouble with the websites that we normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post. I've misplaced his latest update and will ask him to post it on this thread.
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
*
who is?
“Operation Mockingbird being shut down last week should be enough to convince anyone that Q is at least in the loop, never mind all the lesser synchronicities.”
What happened and how was it shut down ?
Maybe he knows that the report that Obama’s guy is going to come out will be in his favor, and he is trying to drive home the fact already that this guy is indeed Obama’s guy.
Did your polisci prof assign you this research paper?
As someone pointed out, I should probably be saying ‘Journo-List’, or the 4AM talking points got shut down.
How do you know operation Mockingbird was shut down?? This is my first hearing about it.
ph
It isn’t just Q backing Sessions. Sundance at Theconservativetreehouse.com is also urging us to trust him on the swamp-draining.
How do we know that ? I didn’t see anything on this.
And in watching CNN, I highly doubt it is shut down - or they are completely out to lunch
How much are we all becoming willing to overlook in terms of what is going on in the details of everyday governance because we are being lulled into a sense that we "need to cut Team Trump some slack on {insert current issue} because of all of this work going on behind the scenes?"Is this all some kind of elaborate psyop to keep his base fat and happy?
I don't have a 100% certain answer on any of this. I'm not sure that anyone does.
What I will offer is in terms of a partial answer, in that I am willing to allow more TIME to pass before I make a final judgement, one way or another.
Now that may sound like a cop-out, but I believe that some rational reasoning can support that at this point in time.
One reason is that this "Q phenomenon" has actually led to a LOT of good results already. What I mean by that is that there is a large segment of the population that is now digging into topics and subjects that they normally would never think twice about. I consider myself to be fairly "awake" and informed for about 10-15 years, and I am learning more details about topics almost daily. But the real benefit isn’t that FReepers (and those alike us) are being (additionally) ’red-pilled’ now, it is that a lot of sharp minded young people are being exposed to, and digging deeply into, these topics.
The other main reason that I see is that what we are all talking about here is a very complex, costly, dangerous, and volatile set of inter-related problems that have been taking root and festering (globally) for many, many decades now. You, like most FReepers, are very well versed in many aspects of the overall whole. That being given, it only stands to reason that any real solution to this is, by definition, going to be highly complex, costly, dangerous, and very volatile in its conception and implementation.
Trump is in month 13 of his term. Even if he (and a close set of allies) hit the ground running on this (if he indeed had been briefed on the overall problem set (for lack of a better word) years ago), 13 months is not a long time, especially considering the enormity of the “above ground” tasks and efforts that needed a LOT of attention.
I assume that Trump has trusted advisors that are guiding him on the development and implementation of a well thought out plan that will maximize the gains (i.e., most arrests, most corruption halted, most lives saved, most national wealth preserved) and minimize the costs (i.e., human lives, disruption of the civil society, global and national economic impact, military stability, to name a few).
I think that you would agree that the ‘opponent’ here is the face of evil; that is widespread, formidable, and conscience-less. Any plan that is not comprehensive, patient, and situational, would surely have the impact of tilting at a windmill from the back of a horse (with some potential worse outcomes from the blowback).
So, for these reasons I am willing to allow more TIME to pass. Personally, I would like to see some tangible results by the end of 2018. If none come, I will again re-assess. (By nature I am not a very patient person, but I find as I grow older, I am more willing to let time pass before making firm judgements.)
Now on the recent Tweet, I tend to go with what you labelled as the “Non-Obvious Answer.” But I would describe it more along the lines of him running preemptive cover against the pushback that will come from the results of the IG’s report on this topic being tainted as partisan. He is preemptively letting people know that Horowitz was an 0bama appointment, not a Trump guy. Additionally, by ‘bashing’ Sessions he is distancing himself from the AG for the same purposes.
I pinged SkyPilot to this post as I am linking in his most recent “storyboard” post as I call them. You may have already seen much of the information that it contains, but some of it may be of interest to you:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
As always, I am interested in your response to this point of view.
He said yesterday that he took down everything after Google gave him two strikes (three strikes and acct is deleted forever).
So was it Google canceling his account or was it him yanking everything from his YT channel?
In any event, he should migrate or simultaneous-stream to D.Tube and/or BitChute:
https://d.tube/#!/v/nemosnews/je77t2by
If you have a way to tweet Corsi, please tell him to migrate. I fail to see why people need to stay on YT.
My apologies in advance If you’ve already tweeted something similar.
There are also alternatives to Twitter. Perhaps you can tweet those as well.
That makes sense.
What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?
Our country is in a civil war...a war between the Good and the bad.
The internal enemy of our country is going to fight back because for them it also an existential fight.
As Hillary said about the Trump victory, "We're all gonna hang."
Be patient and have faith. Trump (with God on his side) is going to deliver, but it won't necessarily be on our time frame.
To this layman it sounds like the Court affirmed the judgement that the Court of Claims isn't the appropriate venue to settle these types of disputes (i.e., any disputes that would necessitate the revelation of secret pacts of a broad variety).
What am I missing?
Amen!
...a contract for secret services during the war made between the President and the claimant.
He was a military HUMINT asset during the Civil War.
Lincoln didn't ask for permission from anybody to send him in.
"We have no difficulty at to the authority of the President in the matter. He was undoubtedly authorized during the war, as commander-in-chief of the armies of the United States, to employ secret agents to enter the rebel lines and obtain information respecting the strength, resources, and movements of the enemy, and contracts to compensate such agents are so far binding upon the government as to render it lawful for the President to direct payment of the amount stipulated out of the contingent fund under his control."
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.