Posted on 02/26/2018 12:31:46 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3634529/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
We're having trouble with the websites that we normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633864/posts?page=15#15
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
I agree, that he was lured to the ranch to be killed. Very possibly his family was threatened; as it was unbelievable they wanted no autopsy, and had his body cremated asap.
Possibly. I think whatever the surrounding facts are (which we will never know most likely) the zero administration wanted the SCOTUS seat as a form of “insurance”, if you will, in case Hillary lost. I think they knew they may possibly not be able to vote-fraud their way to an election win and if that happened they knew they would have to buy time until the next election. Hence the need to control SCOTUS. Just my thoughts.
IMO, the main reason that progress seems so agonizingly slow (Why hasn’t Trump locked her up yet? Why is Sessions invisible/hibernating?) is because Trump and his team want to ensure the safety of US citizens and will not act until they can eliminate threats.
In the past few days, we’ve heard about
FL shooting
potential airplane terrorists
schemes to poison the water supply
MS-13 activity
and those are only the ones I’ve been paying attention to or noticed.
I can think of a LOT of ways that, if I were evil, I could use to threaten people who didn’t go along with the program. And I can think of a lot more ways if I had the cooperation of other evil actors.
Consider that high level people (SCOTUS?) might seem to be acting against our interests because they are being threatened. Not blackmailed over their own failings, not just having their families threatened, but maybe they are being threatened with something like the FL shooting, poisoning the DC water supply, or something similar. If you were a judge would you rule honestly and risk poisoning thousands of people or would you let some scum ball go or rule against Trump’s EO in order to save other lives?
I’m not saying this is the case for everyone. There are obviously plenty of evil characters involved. But when someone who I believe is trustworthy, someone who has a very good record, suddenly goes along with the dark side, threats like these are a possibility that I have to consider as a logical explanation.
Scalia’s closeness with Ginsburg was not normal and made me uneasy although if he was a secret perv it seems like the left could have used that to blackmail him into leaning left on the SC which he never did. Also is a 79 year old man still sexually active, does a man that age feel like raping anyone much less a young boy?
What are WW lanes? (World wide lanes of trafficking?)
I believe the Red Cross is seriously corrupt and has been for many years. They are operating as a charity, but trafficking in human blood. Literally. And with public approval. So what else might they be trafficking in that we don’t know about? And where is all their money going?
I second that.
Thank you for that post. Great points.
I am still reluctant to believe that Scalia was a pedophile. I will change my mind if there is credible evidence.
Like you, I agree his death was fishy. We need answers.
What keeps me hunting for facts is that I defended GWB for so long and now I am 99% convinced he is one of the bad actors.
The number 1 thing I want from Trump / Q / patriots is TRUTH. All else will follow.
Good points, all valid.
All in all, weirdness abounds with Scalia and his death.
Scalia a pedo? Finding that one hard to believe....
Excellent point. The fact that it agrees with my opinions is reassuring. Regardless, that makes a lot of sense.
Also when you consider that he was a thorn in the side of the left and they were SURE that they’d get to replace him with one of their own. Even if the Senate stalled and thwarted 0vomit’s appointment, they “knew” that Hitlery would win and fill the vacancy with a communist/lib/NWO type.
Yes. I want the truth, good, bad or ugly.
Same here. In the hours since it was mentioned I’ve moved on to ‘over it’ if he was. Why he was friends with John Poindexter and C. Allen whosit, DC RAT megalawyers.
... pillow found over Scalia face....
***
I am recalling that the initial statement by the person who found him said that the pillow was “over his head”. Later clarification indicated that he did not mean that the pillow was covering his head but was above his head on the bed — as opposed to under his head.
>> who those folks may be.
My bets: GWB, GHWB.
For some people who aren’t paying attention it will be other RINOs that most of us here already know are dirty: McCain, and probably Ryan, McConnell.
Some surprises are the list of “retiring” congress critters. Most of them I didn’t know and some look like good guys on the surface, but I’m betting that the majority are dirty.
Hmmm. That makes me wonder about Dick Cheney’s hunting accident. Was it an “accident”?
Advice to conservatives and patriots: Don’t accept any invitations to go hunting until this is all sorted out.
Your version probably true, as I only heard one version of finding him, and things get twisted. Over his head is odd, as opposed to under his head, when lying down, but people do odd things with pillows, lol. Maybe he tried to get up but couldn’t.
I still feel he was murdered, and his family does NOT want the publicity, or they were threatened to keep quiet.
Scalia’s closeness with Ginsburg was not normal and made me uneasy although if he was a secret perv it seems like the left could have used that to blackmail him into leaning left on the SC which he never did. Also is a 79 year old man still sexually active, does a man that age feel like raping anyone much less a young boy?
_________________________________
I was stunned to discover Ginzburg wanted to lower the age of consent to 12. If Scalia was a perv then raping a boy would have been more about power over someone young and defenseless and not about libido. Roman Polanski had models and wanna-be actresses throwing themselves at him and still he raped a kid. It was some sick exercise of power. *shudder*
I have read the accusations about Scalia.
You know how you read an article, follow a link, follow another link, & so on & so on. Anyway, in early 2016, I found a person named David Shurter, says he was a victim of child sexual abuse. One of his links lead me to an article about Scalia.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/02/17/scalia-sleeps-with-the-fishes/
LOL, definitely accept no invitations to go hunting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.