Posted on 02/14/2018 3:24:25 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3631368/posts?q=1&;page=1
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate Q Anon threads on Free Republic by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many Q Anon posts posts in my profile page located here: Library of prior Q Anon threads
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. JFK Secret Societies Speech (full version)
yep
Sad to see Alinsky tactics used on FReepers. You are right they like it.
Yeah, I understand what Jones said but I would be very cautious on how Media Matters tries to spin it or take things out of context, etc. I immediately clicked off of it when I saw who the source was. Understand, Media Matters is not our friend at all. Their objective is to protect the DNC, Soros, and the rest of the corrupt status quo. Thanks anyways.
CGato
“....@ABC on #Periscope: Police responding to report of shooting at high school in Parkland, Florida. #schoolshooting https://t.co/cpKssmJvBF—; KS (@ItsMeKimle) February 14, 2018...”
Looks like another bad one.
I wonder if it’s the “clowns doing what the “clowns” do best?
We’ll wait and see, but it sure seems like we have one of these every time something is fixing to “break big” in DC.
Yes, I remember going against that user well while they went on their anti-Trump agenda, now they are trying to impede these discussions of a corrupt government that have been very valuable in waking up Americans, regardless of the specific info being discussed. Like you said, why is that user still here?
CGato
What a croc of caca. FR has some of the most intelligent, well-informed, stable people around. That is totally uncalled for and just another attempt at ridicule, from Rules for Radicals. Alinsky is all the left has to try to defend their corrupt and evil culture and it shows badly in your posts.
Once again, I ask, how does all these discussions around the internet, of exposing a corrupt government, hurt you?
CGato
Just out of curiosity. If you had information that would detrimentally change the world, how would you release it to the public?
This was linked in Q post 729
Questions about John McCain’s foundation have arisen amid revelations that, for the last several years the foundation has not been using its donations, instead depositing small amounts of their large endowment into the Arizona State University Foundation. This issue has added importance when considered in the context of John McCain’s controversial sources of funding and the arrest of a number of past campaign workers on charges such as child abuse and drug trafficking.
I. The McCain Institute
The McCain Institute for International Leadership is a think tank established in cooperation with Arizona State University. The primary focus of the foundation is combatting human trafficking and promoting a new generation of “national security leaders.” The McCain Institute has hosted a number of speaking events over the years, with speakers such as Joe Biden, Ben Affleck, Hillary and Bill Clinton, Governor Chris Christie, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe. Board members of the McCain Institute’s Human Trafficking Advisory Council include Ashton Kutcher, co-founder of anti-human trafficking group, Thorn. The Institute’s Board of Trustees includes Lynn Forester de Rothschild, former general David Petraeus and Joseph Lieberman. Factoring in board members, employees and interns, the McCain Institute has 80 employees assisting their operations in various capacities.
With the connections that the McCain Institute enjoys, the expectation would be that they would be using their generous endowments, ample staff and influence to make meaningful strides in the fight against human trafficking. But an inspection of their finances reveals that this is not the case.
II. The McCain Institute Is Not Spending Their Endowment
A review of the McCain Institute’s filings with the IRS reveals that they are not, in fact, spending any of their endowment on combatting human trafficking, or apparently on any other expenses. In 2012, the McCain Institute received $8,685,619 in donations, gifts and grants. Yet their expenses were a mere $500,000. In 2013 they again, only contributed $500,000 of their endowment. In 2014, the McCain Institute received $1,305,000 and donated $1,500,000. All of the donations made by the McCain Institute in 2012, 2013 and 2014 went to the Arizona State University Foundation, a group which appears to have nothing to do with human trafficking. Why McCain is not spending his foundation’s endowment on anything, let alone anti-human trafficking efforts, raises questions about where the cash is actually going and what it is being used for.
III. John McCain Has A Long History Of Corruption Allegations And Criminal Staff Members Involved With His Campaigns
The McCain Institute’s website features a long list of donors that includes Chevron, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Sir Evelyn and Lynn Forester de Rothschild, FedEx Corporation, the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and McCain’s own 2008 Presidential Campaign. McCain has always been cozy with big name donors, a habit which has caused him to be accused of impropriety in a number of instances. In 1989 McCain narrowly escaped corruption charges along with four other Senators after it was alleged that they intervened on banker Charles Keating Jr.’s behalf to resist banking regulators in return for financial support. In 2008, McCain was accused of impropriety by Judicial Watch after he accepted campaign donations from multiple members of the Rothschild family in London. Wikileaks also revealed that McCain had improperly lobbied the Russian government for campaign contributions. In 2016, McCain cut off reporters enquiring about a $1 million donation that he had received from Saudi Arabia in 2014. More recently in February 2017, Breitbart accused McCain of corruption after it emerged that McCain, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Lindsey Graham had all accepted donations from George Soros.
Multiple members of McCain’s various campaign staff have been arrested in the past on criminal charges. In 2009, the former manager of McCain’s Pueblo, Colorado presidential campaign office was arrested on child molestation charges after it was alleged that he had abused a number of young boys; at least one molestation occurred during the time that he was working for McCain. In April 2016, a former fundraiser for John McCain was arrested on multiple felony drug charges, including child endangerment after police found an active meth lab and meth, LSD and cocaine in her house. She had been listed as a contact in fundraising documents for Senator McCain.
The failure of the McCain Institute to actually spend their money on furthering the foundation’s stated objectives, Senator McCain’s long history courting controversy by attracting accusations of corruption and multiple instances of his campaign staff’s involvement in criminal activities raise serious questions about the work being done by his Institute to combat human trafficking and where the money given to it is actually going.
I think that if someone feels embarrassed to be posting on FR, they ought to go find a forum more aligned with their beliefs. Like DU.
I suspect that there are more than a couple of people that venture into these forums trying to disrupt for the purpose of keeping information away from others. Psy-ops of sorts. Why else would somebody go through such lengths to try to discourage others from reading whatever they choose to read?
I mean, if you think it’s BS, fine. Say so and move on. But that’s not what’s happening here. They are trying very hard to discourage others from seeing the information. A person that doesn’t have ulterior motives would not continually do that.
Pa always said, "Dont work hard if you can work smart."
Every time the hens calm down you kick them and they generate more background noise than all the open trolls have combined.
Provided they arent a prearranged part of the shtick, you may be the most efficient man alive.
With all due respect.
Must be those Russian bots again.
Let’s see. One broke the Monica case before Drudge, but could not readily come up with his user name and then could not find his original post - tells someone else to do it
Honestly, I think it’s even bigger than that. If true, he is bragging that he went to a site that he thought Drudge used to write up his stuff. Found the story that had not been uploaded yet. He didn’t know if Drudge had even finished editing it. He stole it, and then copied the stolen material to FR!! Unbelievable. What if Drudge was still doing fact checking. He said there were edits, but only in punctuation. Imagine if Drudge needed to make more serious edits? He then went on to hint that at that time, Drudge quit linking to FR.
I cannot wrap my head around how risky that would have been. However, all in all, it probably didn’t happen.
Oh God. Prayers up.
Clicking the video link tells me the video is not available (?).
Many dead,we have 4 in High school right now.How did he get in.Looks like terrorist attack.
Here’s video of the shooting.Very graphic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9MDHmZHcVQ
Pulled by YouTube already!
Agreed completely.
Shooter had been in the classroom and was right outside in the hallway.You could hear students screaming and shots.Inside the classroom were dead bodies.A student took the video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.