"We will make your foundation the Leader.
Borders, global warming, the American People and Trump are our enemies."
Posted on 01/19/2018 5:12:14 AM PST by SandRat
TUCSON — Wildfires, extreme storms and major weather events can seem like a distant threat, but for those whose lives have been directly impacted by these events, the threat hits much closer to home.
As reports of such incidents continue to rise, researchers at the University of Arizona set out to learn more about how people's perception of the threat of global climate change affects their mental health. They found that while some people have little anxiety about the Earth's changing climate, others are experiencing high levels of stress, and even depression, based on their perception of the threat of global climate change.
While significant research has explored the environmental impacts of climate change, far fewer studies have considered its psychological effect on humans, said UA researcher Sabrina Helm, an associate professor of family and consumer science in the UA's Norton School of Family and Consumer Sciences in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
Helm and her colleagues found that psychological responses to climate change seem to vary based on what type of concern people show for the environment, with those highly concerned about the planet's animals and plants experiencing the most stress.
The researchers outline in a new study, which appears in the journal Global Environmental Change, three distinct types of environmental concern: Egoistic concern is concern about how what's happening in the environment directly impacts the individual. For example, a person might worry about how air pollution will affect their own lungs and breathing. Altruistic concern refers to concern for humanity in general, including future generations. Biospheric concern refers to concern for nature, plants and animals.
In an online survey of 342 parents of young children, those who reported high levels of biospheric concern also reported feeling the most stressed about global climate change, while those whose concerns were more egoistic or altruistic did not report significant stress related to the phenomenon.
In addition, those with high levels of biospheric concern were most likely to report signs of depression, while no link to depression was found for the other two groups.
"People who worry about animals and nature tend to have a more planetary outlook and think of bigger picture issues," Helm said. "For them, the global phenomenon of climate change very clearly affects these bigger picture environmental things, so they have the most pronounced worry, because they already see it everywhere. We already talk about extinction of species and know it's happening. For people who are predominantly altruistically concerned or egotistically concerned about their own health, or maybe their own financial future, climate change does not hit home yet."
Those with high levels of biospheric concern also were most likely to engage in pro-environmental day-to-day behaviors, such as recycling or energy savings measures, and were the most likely to engage in coping mechanisms to deal with environmental stress, ranging from denying one's individual role in climate change to seeking more information on the issue and how to help mitigate it.
Although not generally stressed about climate change, those with high levels of altruistic concern, or concern for the well-being of others, also engaged in some environmental coping strategies and pro-environmental behaviors — more so than those whose environmental concerns were mostly egoistic.
"Climate change is a persistent global stressor, but the consequences of it appear to be slowly evolving. They're fairly certain to happen — we know that, now — but the impact on individuals seems to be growing really slowly and needs to be taken very seriously," said Helm, whose co-authors include UA Norton School researchers Melissa Barnett, Melissa Curran and Zelieann Craig, along with UA alumna Amanda Pollitt.
The research, Helm said, has important public health implications.
"Climate change has evident physical and mental health effects if you look at certain outcomes, such as the hurricanes we had last year, but we also need to pay very close attention to the mental health of people in everyday life, as we can see this, potentially, as a creeping development," Helm said. "Understanding that there are differences in how people are motivated is very important for finding ways to address this, whether in the form of intervention or prevention."
"We will make your foundation the Leader.
Borders, global warming, the American People and Trump are our enemies."
Morons of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but your brains.
Who pays these idiots? There is no doubt that some of the low IQ populace (results of our education system) will believe them.
Who are these people? Their audience must be less than 10 years old.
I have seen weather so bad, 10 minutes or so is all I could stand outside. The Hurricanes are always unpredictible.
1969 seems to stand out. The cold of 1985 was intense. (-24 Knoxville)
The snows of 67,68 and 77,78 were quite noble.
I had to shovel coal into the school furnace in the 6th grade, and that was in Tennessee!
The liberal left does nothing more than try to scare people to death. Life is hard, it even harder when your stupid. (The Duke)
Good idea. “Global Climate Change”!fanatics do seem to be a bit touched in the head.
So is this study about the psychological responses to the subject of climate change, or psychological responses to changes in weather patterns that aren’t as the respondent thinks they should be?
So the way I read it, those worshiping and being indoctrinated by the Global Warming Cult suffer more stress even if the manifestations of the cult’s predictions aren’t apparent to the adherent?
AYE
“.....psychological effects of climate change......”......
Nothing to worry about, it only effects liberals.
I keep hoping for tropical, beach front property, but it stubbornly remains subfreezing new england hill country. Now I’m sad.
What the study should look at is the effect that news reporting of catastrophism has on people’s mental health.
But.. If you get enough people confused enough to mutilate their genitals, maybe the weather won’t worry them as much anymore. /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.