was there ever this much coverage about the Wookie and her fashion 'rivals?'
1 posted on
11/09/2017 2:28:18 PM PST by
drewh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: drewh
No, because even the libtards knew she was ugly, fat, and frumpy.
2 posted on
11/09/2017 2:31:29 PM PST by
Catmom
(We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
To: drewh
Its the constant playing with her hair that tells me she shouldn’t be there.
3 posted on
11/09/2017 2:31:57 PM PST by
samadams2000
(Someone important make......The Call!)
To: drewh
Whatever....
Hope is smoking hot....
4 posted on
11/09/2017 2:32:47 PM PST by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: drewh
Is this the lead story on CNN now? Or are they still on sexual harassment?
5 posted on
11/09/2017 2:34:00 PM PST by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: drewh
No. Of course not. Any day now I expect all the Major Media to spend a week about why Melania is using the wrong kind of handkerchief. Or has a caterpillar on one of her shoes.
7 posted on
11/09/2017 2:34:20 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: drewh
“......it’s left people wondering........”
What “people” do they refer to, I’m certainly not giving Hope Hicks one single thought, except to say that our side has lots better women to look at!
Mouchelle, Madelyn Halfbright, Valerie Jarrett, then there’s her majesty, Madam Thighness!
9 posted on
11/09/2017 2:36:54 PM PST by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: drewh
10 posted on
11/09/2017 2:37:31 PM PST by
rrrod
(just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.6l)
To: drewh
They are trying to start trouble. Hicks is fine and if she dressed down she did it because she wanted to. The media was using her to diss Melania.
16 posted on
11/09/2017 2:41:05 PM PST by
dforest
To: drewh
I doubt she was told to tone it down.
17 posted on
11/09/2017 2:42:12 PM PST by
McGavin999
("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
To: drewh
I’m sure the Wookie was overshadowed by any other women around her.... well except for Shrillary.... or ValJar (who looks scary)... or....
20 posted on
11/09/2017 2:43:40 PM PST by
Enchante
(Bill, Anthony, Harvey .... how does lesbo Hillary manage to surround herself with male predators???)
To: drewh
I like beautiful women. The more the Merrier.
Now back to our regular programming: Russia, Russia, Russia.
To: drewh
With all other problems of the world now solved..
Oh! Does Mr. Sessions know about it?
To: drewh
Beautiful, smart and patriotic.
Hope is the perfect Lady.
32 posted on
11/09/2017 2:53:04 PM PST by
WashingtonFire
(President Trump - it's like having your dad as President !)
To: drewh
This is the definition of fake news. Completely making up without a shred of evidence a storyline whereby the lovely and gracious Melania is supposed to be upstaged by the younger communications director. Blah, blah, blah.
To: drewh
It would make sense that she would dress differently in China.
36 posted on
11/09/2017 3:02:46 PM PST by
tiki
To: drewh
100% certified synthetic fake news.
To: drewh
Hope is a twit, placed there by Ivanka. She has no business even GOING on such a trip or being in the white house.
Shes a 29 year old english major, did some modeling, and was Ivanka’s assistant in the fashion business.
Think of the astonishing talent that SHOULD have been there.
I remember Trump talking about these wall street “killers”, ruthless hard businessmen.
Not a twit from SMU in a pink dress.
38 posted on
11/09/2017 3:09:23 PM PST by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
To: drewh
To: drewh
To: drewh
Another example of FAKE NEWS!
Every chance these commie scum get a chance they try to "divide & conquer" with lies.
48 posted on
11/09/2017 3:30:28 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson