Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Blocks Texas from Giving Public Voter Data to Trump’s Election Integrity Commission
Breitbart Texas ^ | 10/05/2017 | by Bob Price

Posted on 10/06/2017 6:41:52 AM PDT by Rusty0604

A Democrat Texas judge blocked the Secretary of State (TxSOS) from turning over data to President Donald Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity from the public voter rolls. The TxSOS is required by state law to turn over the public information to anyone who requests it properly as long as it is not for commercial use.

Judge Tim Sulak, a Democrat who serves on the 353rd District Court located in Travis County, filed a temporary restraining order that prevents TxSOS Rolando Pablos from turning over voter information to the commission established by President Donald Trump in June, according to a spokesman from the TxSOS office.

While not speaking directly about this case, TxSOS spokesman Sam Taylor told Breitbart Texas Thursday morning that Texas law requires the TxSOS to release the public information, as defined by statute, to any person or organization that fills out the form, pays the fee and signs an affidavit certifying that the information will not be used for commercial purposes.

The League of Women Voters of Texas and the Texas NAACP filed the lawsuit against Pablos and Keith Ingram who heads up the Texas Elections Division for the TxSOS office, in July.

The restraining order expires after 14 days unless it is replaced by another temporary injunction. The requested information has not been released to the commission pending the outcome of the lawsuit.

The Texas Attorney General’s office is defending the State in court.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: elections; texas; voting

1 posted on 10/06/2017 6:41:52 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Judge shopping.


2 posted on 10/06/2017 6:48:32 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

On what LEGAL basis did the judge do this? Inquiring minds want to know.


3 posted on 10/06/2017 6:50:38 AM PDT by cld51860 (Volo pro veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

At some point these heavy-handed judges need to be ignored.


4 posted on 10/06/2017 6:51:03 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Not much in the article about the lawsuit which is the reason for the restraining order.


5 posted on 10/06/2017 6:51:54 AM PDT by TheDon (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cld51860

Some judges are above the law.


6 posted on 10/06/2017 6:51:56 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

The utter and total hypocrisy of these libs...

They want an open and transparent society. So anybody who supported prop 8 should have their addresses published publically so they can be harassed.

Except when it comes to voting records and who’s registered and if they voted. Not HOW they voted which is still protected just that they did. No no, even though it’s law that those are public records, even though it’s important for the public to have the info to confirm the voting counts and percentages - nope, like AntiFa this information must be kept hidden from the public lest the liberals chicanery be discovered...


7 posted on 10/06/2017 6:58:30 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Interesting. You can buy the info online at Datatraxonline from Zebec Data Systems....


8 posted on 10/06/2017 6:59:02 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Another Austin Democrat Judge exerting his puny liberalism for a mostly meaningless ruling. It will be taken to a higher court and overturned, as the all are, but this gets this cretin’s name in the paper.


9 posted on 10/06/2017 7:00:44 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

A Democrat judge up for reelection in a Democrat controlled county. There is no chance he won’t be overturned by the court of appeals, but he couldn’t buy this amount of press coverage. His election base is eating it up.


10 posted on 10/06/2017 7:00:53 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Every liberal is a violent totalitarian thug.


11 posted on 10/06/2017 7:03:42 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daler

It’s time for Trump to turn into one of the democrats’ favorite presidents:
Andrew Jackson.


12 posted on 10/06/2017 7:03:57 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Checks and balances seemed like a good idea until one branch figured out that they had way more power than the other two and was totally unaccountable. Now it turns out the only reason elections matter is because it’s our only chance to affect who gets to be a black robed dictator for life.


13 posted on 10/06/2017 7:09:23 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Sounds about right.


14 posted on 10/06/2017 7:15:20 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

These judges need to be reined in.


15 posted on 10/06/2017 7:16:19 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

We need background checks for voters.

Keep hammering that point - and hoist the Dems on their own petard.

That, and “reasonable restrictions” on abortion.


16 posted on 10/06/2017 7:36:24 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Tell me again about the value of the ‘League of Women Voters” and what their REAL agenda is.

These are the same people who roam the malls & ‘register’ voters without any proof that they are legal to vote.


17 posted on 10/06/2017 7:57:24 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
Or Stalin: How many divisions does this judge have?
18 posted on 10/06/2017 8:45:19 AM PDT by ex91B10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Covering up the fraud on behalf of the RAT party.


19 posted on 10/06/2017 8:59:50 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson