Why Democrats fear voter fraud investigations

Washington Times ^ | 13 Sep, 2017 | Tammy Bruce

[MtnClimber]

As President Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity met on Tuesday in New Hampshire to discuss voter fraud, the usual liberal suspects cried wolf.

During last year’s election, the president voiced what we know — that voter fraud exists. The only question is to what degree, and that’s the mission of the commission.

For anyone who dismisses concerns about voter fraud, the unhinged reaction by the left at investigating it should, at the very least, make a logical person wonder what they’re so concerned about.

After all, if you believe the issue is false, or at the most an irrelevant factor in end results, you should welcome confirmation of that fact. Unless, of course, one fears the actual outcome may prove how voter fraud impacts local and state races to the point of shifting the balance of power in Washington, D.C.

Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state and vice chairman of the president's commission, has already caused quite the stir. In a Breitbart article, Mr. Kobach revealed that out-of-state voters may have changed not only the outcome of the New Hampshire U.S. Senate race, but also could have impacted who won the state’s presidential contest.

Mr. Kobach’s assertion is quite simple and demands an investigation, which is exactly what the commission will do. He noted that New Hampshire is a state with same-day voter registration, which eliminates the ability to determine the eligibility of those voters. He said that last year there were 6,540 same-day registrants with out-of-state driver’s licenses.

[MtnClimber]

They should also look at places where more votes were cast than registered voters.

[originalbuckeye]

I really like Tammy Bruce. So glad she (obviously) hired a voice coach to modulate her former ‘nails on the blackboard’ voice. I have liked her ever since she came to promenance during the OJ trial, when the women of NOW didn’t hold OJ accountable for his wife beating or for the murders of Nicole and Ron.

[MtnClimber]

“The state requires residents to obtain a state driver’s license within 60 days of moving, yet since the election “5,313 of those voters neither obtained a New Hampshire driver’s license nor registered a vehicle in New Hampshire. They have not followed the legal requirements for residents regarding driver’s licenses, and it appears that they are not actually residing in New Hampshire. It seems that they never were bona fide residents of the State.”

This number, Mr. Kobach pointed out, is large enough to have made the difference in the state’s U.S. Senate race as well as the presidential election. Hillary Clinton won the swing state by only 2,738 votes. Incumbent Republican Kelly Ayotte lost her Senate seat to Democrat Maggie Hassan by the slim margin of 1,017 votes.”

[ripley]

Voter fraud is the Democrat’s voter registration drive that places Mickey and Minnie Mouse, thousands of people in the cemeteries, and thousands of John Does on the rolls so that anyone can walk up and say they are John Doe, Mickey or Minnie Mouse, or one of countless thousands of people whose identity now exists on tomb stones.

(Subversive scu&bags will always be subversive scu&bags.)

IMHO

[17th Miss Regt]

They should also look at places where more votes were cast than registered voters.

Why? (/sarc)

[ridesthemiles]

I wrote out a plan to find the voter fraud & stop it. Look at

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498841/posts post #44

I also wrote it all out in longhand & mailed it to President Trump.

[Mr. K]

so instead of winning by 304 to 227 electoral college count

Trump would have won by 308 to 223

[The_Media_never_lie]

They should also look at places where more votes were cast than registered voters.

---

Voters without a pulse should be prosecuted for fraud.

[Buckeye Battle Cry]

But we would still have a GOP senator were it not for the fraud.

[I am Richard Brandon]

THIS STORY REALLY TICKS ME OFF!

If these 5,000+ used out of State driving licenses to identify themselves, why does the story not contain the result of an investigation into whether they VOTED IN THEIR ‘HOME’STATE AS WELL? It should take only a very few minutes to do. Why is the answer not there? Dereliction of duty by both the electoral people and the article writer !!!!

[Pajamajan]

"If these 5000+ used ot of State driving licences to identify themselves, why does the story not contain the result of investigation into whether they VOTED IN THEIR 'HOMESTATE AS WELL?"

And how long they (5000+) are going to be in jail for engaging in voter fraud.

If nobody does anything about this, it will never stop. Democrats will "win" every election.

[I am Richard Brandon]

The answer is obvious - it is deliberate fraud by Democrat officials. They own the voting bureaucracy and are almost untouchable.

[minnesota_bound]

Some 2 million fraudulent votes in Los Angeles county.