PAY ATTENTION you Bernie Bots
This is your future unless you mend your ways
Why do you think that the depictions of death have him wearing a black robe?
Let the kid go home to die for Chrissakes. They already prevented him from getting treatment that may have helped. Now they want to prevent the family from bringing their son home to pass away peacefully with family there.
This is what single payer does.
I have some mixed feelings about the parents. But not allowing them to bring Charlie home to die amongst loved ones is beyond cruel. A sick system.
Yet on the evidence it appears it is more the Judge's child than hers; for she is not the one the government put in charge of the matter, and it seems the people belong to the government and the government wants to make it very clear in this example. This is the bargain a people strike when they put the government in charge of caring for their basic needs.
Sorry for this response, but I can only hope this very judge - and obama both have the fortune of this exact life experience.
Single payer (government) insurance means that the payer (gevenment) gets to make the decisions....BAD IDEA DEMOCRATS.
WHEN, not if, a ‘ruling elite’ cleansing revolution is sparked which will see these tyrants liquidated, it will come from some humble domestic overreach like this case.
Why all the drama and BS? Why didn’t the judge just order an abortion 11 months ago? /s
This is nothing less than the UK’s way of declaring that NHS is equal to US medicine and re-affirming that UK parents are not in charge of their own children. The idea that the state should intervene on behalf of children when their welfare is being neglected by bad parents has evolved to the state having the final say on matters involving children with good parents as well. I thought the UK was a Constitutional Democracy. But it has devolved into a unconstitutional, politically correct nanny state.
When the arrogance of lawyers treats human beings as “property of the government”.
We have a massive indoctrinated misunderstanding of truth, when it comes to “what is best to do”.
Too many of us are sheeple who have been politically bred to think by mere appointment to a government position those appointed somehow magically become “the best and brightest authority” to which there cannot be any better opinion. It is intellectual nonsense.
That would be bad enough alone, if not added to that was the state treating human beings as its property. In the current case it’s as if little Charlie Gard is not his parents child at all; just someone owned by the state to do with as it wishes. The case represents an example of how far the intellectual traditions of western civilization have sunk.
Sad for the parents. This is government-controlled healthcare.
Off topic a little, but aren’t the parents MARRIED??? This is so bad if they are not.
Practically speaking, M’am, it IS his child as HE decides what will be what with respect to Charlie Gard.
This poor soul learned first hands what the affects of liberalism really are. May God bless this poor family.
This judge needs to be sanctioned by the United States government just like Iranian leaders, Venezuelan leaders etc.
President Trump banned some people from certain countries entering and this judge for starters needs to be specifically banned from entering the USA along with hospital staff also involved in denying Charlie Gard the treatment early on when it may have helped him.
This is single payer.
Thank a Republican.
Ah, the wonders of socialized medicine, where the state will decide for parents when their child’s medical treatment should stop, resulting in his death. And American liberals can’t wait to provide this to us.
This horror is about protecting the image of the liberal British health care system, not about healing. The British people as a whole are responsible for this.