Skip to comments.
Colonel Benjamin Grierson’s Cavalry Raid in 1863
4/17/17
Posted on 04/17/2017 7:05:22 AM PDT by Kartographer
Early on the morning of April 17, 1863 La Grange, Tennessee Colonel Benjamin H. Grierson, commander of the 1st Brigade of the Cavalry Division, XVI Corps, Army of Tennessee lead ou this Horse Soldiers, his orders included nothing less than an invasion of Mississippione of the most daring and successful cavalry raids of the Civil War.
TOPICS: History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
From April 17 until May, 2 Grierson command consisting of 1,700 veterans from the 6th and 7th Illinois and the 2d Iowa Cavalry regiments went through the heart of Mississippi Traveling more than 600 miles in those 16 days, with little rest or sleep, Grierson's raiders had captured 500 Confederates, killed or wounded another 100, destroyed more than 50 miles of railroad and telegraph, 3,000 stands of arms and thousands of dollars worth of supplies and property. Over 1,000 mules and horses were captured, in addition to tying up all of Pemberton's cavalry, one-third of his infantry and several regiments of artillery. Grierson suffered, including Hatch's losses, total casualties of 36.
To: Kartographer
2
posted on
04/17/2017 7:06:52 AM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Kartographer
This is the kind of thing you can do when you have a substantial advantage in manpower and resources.
3
posted on
04/17/2017 7:16:05 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Kartographer
4
posted on
04/17/2017 7:16:40 AM PDT
by
Sybeck1
To: BenLurkin
Does take some imagination, guts and tactical flexibility to pull it off, however. The goal was to distract Pemberton, and it did that.
5
posted on
04/17/2017 7:56:05 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
To: Kartographer
"Grierson suffered, including Hatch's losses, total casualties of 36"Does that include Lukey?
6
posted on
04/17/2017 8:10:06 AM PDT
by
Wyrd bið ful aræd
(Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
To: Kartographer
The calvary usage in the Civil War was an interesting moment in time. Soon thereafter, they were marginalized due to better rifles and artillery and by the time of WWI they were mounted dragoons at best.
7
posted on
04/17/2017 8:14:07 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: Kartographer
8
posted on
04/17/2017 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
(Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen)
To: PLMerite
9
posted on
04/17/2017 8:19:19 AM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: BenLurkin
This is the kind of thing you can do when you have a substantial advantage in manpower and resources. Yet lacking both didn't seem to slow down Bedford Forrest any.
To: KC Burke
Interestingly though cavalry troops continued to be used through all of WW2.
11
posted on
04/17/2017 8:31:53 AM PDT
by
jmacusa
(Dad may be in charge but mom knows whats going on.)
To: RightGeek
12
posted on
04/17/2017 8:34:48 AM PDT
by
PLMerite
(Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen)
To: jmacusa
But only as mounted infantry and scouts. The Crimean War and the Civil War were about the time of the last calvary fighting from horseback on an organized scale.
It is interesting to note how little coverage has been given to the use of horse and mule clear up to WWII, but the great skills of Forrest, Morgan, Sheridan, and Grierson in mounted attacks passed shortly thereafter.
13
posted on
04/17/2017 8:37:35 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: DoodleDawg
Yup. Hit ‘em where they ain’t.
14
posted on
04/17/2017 8:38:00 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
15
posted on
04/17/2017 8:40:39 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: PLMerite
This was the basis/inspiration for the John Wayne movie, The Horse Soldiers, yes?
Yes it was
16
posted on
04/17/2017 8:41:14 AM PDT
by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: KC Burke
Always find it interesting there was no heavy cavalry wearing breast plates as one saw in Europe. American cavalry was hardly employed for shock action.
17
posted on
04/17/2017 8:45:25 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: KC Burke
The Franco-Prussian war of 1870 saw both sides still employ traditional heavy cavalry. The last major battle between cavalry units was during the Soviet-Polish war of 1919-1921.
18
posted on
04/17/2017 8:48:18 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: C19fan
We were past the point in long gun history where rate of fire, ring bayonets and pikes could stave off armored calvary as it could not in Vienna against the Polish heavy calvary some 180 years prior.
19
posted on
04/17/2017 8:52:24 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: C19fan
That is a good point. However it was two similar fast mobile forces of like character meeting head-to-head. Such cavalry could not have much luck with entrenched infantry with embanked artillery as was seen thereafter.
20
posted on
04/17/2017 8:55:23 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson