Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Harry & US Actress Meghan Markle Moving In Together at Kensington Palace
Natl Enquirer.com ^ | Posted on Mar 27, 2017 @ 9:13AM | staff report

Posted on 03/27/2017 2:48:28 PM PDT by drewh

Prince Harry is ready to move his girlfriend into Kensington Palace — and The ENQUIRER had the scoop on how Meghan Markle has already taken over the redecorating! Insiders told The ENQUIRER that Harry had already planned for the palace as a new home for him and his very serious girlfriend.

Officially, Harry and Meghan would be moving into an apartment in the castle — right next to Prince William and Princess Kate, who are making a move back to London as Queen Elizabeth grows more ill. But sources added that Meghan has already made her mark on the whole estate!

A close pal of the star told The ENQUIRER that Meg is “turning the palace upside down with her renovations" — adding: “She knows what she wants! Meghan’s incredibly headstrong when it comes to her own tastes!” The L.A. native is insisting on eco-friendly renovations, airy open rooms, neutral colors, large comfortable sofas and chairs, and modern glass and metal accessories. But the commoner’s attitude is making some palace insiders cringe!

While Harry just wants his squeeze happy, the pal reveals that the prince has already made one royal concession. Queen Elizabeth might not be amused, though! “Meghan’s dogs, Bogart and Guy, sleep on the furniture and beds and have free rein,” said the insider. “She sees the queen’s Corgi dogs get a free pass — so her dogs should, too!”


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: shackingup; trustednews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: nopardons

I can comment on it if I like. And really there’s little in this world sadder than Royal worship. Face facts, when push comes to shove they’re just another family of layabout living off benefits checks. England already has more of those than they need.


81 posted on 03/28/2017 7:38:34 AM PDT by discostu (There are times when all the world's asleep, the questions run too deep, for such a simple man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
That was harsh. Unnecessarily so.

=================================

No it wasn't. The members of the royal family are supposed to set an example since the Queen is head of the Anglican Church:

Google: The Supreme Governor of the Church of England is a title held by the British monarch that signifies titular leadership over the Church of England. Although the monarch's authority over the Church of England is largely ceremonial, the position is still very relevant to the church and is mostly observed in a symbolic capacity. The Supreme Governor formally appoints high-ranking members of the church on the advice of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, who is in turn advised by church leaders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Governor_of_the_Church_of_England

So, HER family is SUPPOSED to set the standard as well. Or is it just hunky-dory to shack up just because?

You are the one who was "harsh" to me.

82 posted on 03/28/2017 11:28:53 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I think this is just a ‘starter’ to see if they are amendable for a long term childbearing marriage.


83 posted on 03/28/2017 11:31:14 AM PDT by drewh (>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

I’m not okay with shacking up at all and I understand that the royals are role models. I just think referring to her as a whore was unnecessary. You could have made your point without attacking her.


84 posted on 03/28/2017 12:33:00 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (SandyInPeoria just doesn't sound right... yet here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
I know about, not by choice, but because it becomes world wide news.

Do you live under a rock?

85 posted on 03/28/2017 12:53:56 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Of course you are allowed to comment on anything you care to and show, beyond a shadow of a doubt, how uneducated, banal, and benighted you are. ;^)

I don't "worship" royalty at all. I comment on news, here, and supply well educated, well informed, replies.

86 posted on 03/28/2017 12:57:13 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

You’ve insulted half a dozen people for daring to think the royals are silly, you’ve declared people don’t even have a right to an opinion on the matter. You worship the royals, that is a simple fact. Much like the royals being a complete waste of money and time. Those are the facts, whether you admit them or not.

And no, insulting people is not an educated, or informed reply.


87 posted on 03/28/2017 12:59:56 PM PDT by discostu (There are times when all the world's asleep, the questions run too deep, for such a simple man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

No, but I don’t pay attention to garbage.


88 posted on 03/28/2017 3:37:14 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
I’m not okay with shacking up at all and I understand that the royals are role models. I just think referring to her as a whore was unnecessary. You could have made your point without attacking her.

Why is SHE exempt from the truth? Whores are what they are. You know that. Are her looks a passport to do what we all KNOW is wrong and sinful?

Of course, being female perhaps I have less patience with women who are allowed to get away with bad things ONLY because of looks. The price was JUST as wrong.

If the shoe fits.

89 posted on 03/29/2017 6:07:32 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson