Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SandyInSeattle
That was harsh. Unnecessarily so.

=================================

No it wasn't. The members of the royal family are supposed to set an example since the Queen is head of the Anglican Church:

Google: The Supreme Governor of the Church of England is a title held by the British monarch that signifies titular leadership over the Church of England. Although the monarch's authority over the Church of England is largely ceremonial, the position is still very relevant to the church and is mostly observed in a symbolic capacity. The Supreme Governor formally appoints high-ranking members of the church on the advice of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, who is in turn advised by church leaders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Governor_of_the_Church_of_England

So, HER family is SUPPOSED to set the standard as well. Or is it just hunky-dory to shack up just because?

You are the one who was "harsh" to me.

82 posted on 03/28/2017 11:28:53 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: cloudmountain

I’m not okay with shacking up at all and I understand that the royals are role models. I just think referring to her as a whore was unnecessary. You could have made your point without attacking her.


84 posted on 03/28/2017 12:33:00 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (SandyInPeoria just doesn't sound right... yet here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson