Sorry - I was looking at several Sheriff Joe articles and pasted in the wrong one. Here is the one showing the Cameraon email and ripping on Joe’s investigation into Montgomery’s allegations:
Sorry, I can’t accept that letter/’report’ for any value of getting to the truth. If anything it only further illustrates La Raza’s lawyer’s pursuit of anything to throw against Arpaio.
Red flags of bias in the write-up are frequently observed in a cursory reading:
Non-existent plot,
absurd,
bizarre conspiracy,
paranoid minds,
civil rights case Melendres v. Arpaio,
Federal Judge G. Murray Snow,
ludicrous investigation of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate,
Montgomery a ‘swindler’ (but was hired back; uh-huh)
These descriptors are not professional; they are indicators of unprofessional name-calling.
There is also posted of the Arpaio timeline FROM THE COURT, and that is the only item of value that I see precisely because it originates from the court and not someone’s ranting behavior. People’s rants hold no value to me. The timeline has, however, nothing to incriminate Arpaio, so it’s unclear why it was posted.
In sum, the letter is of no value.