Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Need A NEW Democrat "American" Party
03/12/17 | hapnHal

Posted on 03/12/2017 12:29:16 PM PDT by hapnHal

Yes, it's time for the formulation of a NEW Democrat AMERICAN Party.

The Democratic Party once produced Presidents such as Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy. These major Democrat party leaders were fierce opponents of mass immigration because they recognized the negative impact it had on wages.

And America’s center-left party presented itself as a friend to American workers, fighting for Americas interests against corporate bosses.

But the Democratic Party of the past is "NOT" the Democratic Party of today. Indeed, the current Democratic Party is more concerned with defending “international socialism” than American workers.

.It has now become a socialist party, Today’s Democratic Party has completely abandoned the ‘middle ground.’ It is now a full-on ‘progressive party’ with an agenda and platform almost indistinguishable from that of the Communist Party, or Democratic Socialists of America.

The Democrats of today would be marching in the streets against traditional Democrats such as Harry Truman or JFK.

Today's Democratic National Committee, has had a long history of involvement with both the Communist Party and radical Islamic groups.

Democrats are actively involved with several Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as CAIR and the Muslim American Society.

The Democratic Party has "NOT" always been characterized by unquestioning support for open borders. Indeed, the American left’s sudden backing of mass immigration is fairly recent.

Until the mid-1990s, both the AFL-CIO and the Democrats were staunchly opposed to lax border security, Illegal immigration disproportionately hurt both the black community and their white working class base.

However, in 1994, the Democratic Socialists of America, under John Sweeney, took over the AFL-CIO from Lane Kirkland and his supporters. The clause prohibiting communists from holding AFL-CIO office was quietly dropped. Now the AFL-CIO is completely controlled by the hard left. Orchestrated by another DSAer, Eliseo Medina, the AFL-CIO switched its policy in 2000 to open support for amnesty for illegal immigrants. The Democrats quickly followed suit.

The modern Democratic Party has abandoned even the pretense of trying to help American workers. Instead, they seek to gain power by essentially replacing the current American people with a new work party.

The prize was 12 to 30 million illegals – who would vote 70 to 80 percent Democrat. This would effectively bring about a one-party state, controlled by the Democrats and the communist controlled unions. The AFL-CIO and Democratic Party today represent international socialism. Damn the American worker.

As a result, the current Democratic Party is really just an anti-white coalition. The Democratic party now feels white people should not be entitled to protection under the Voting Rights Act.

The Democratic plan is simply to replace American citizens. The left wants to expand the Democratic Party voting base to create a socialist one-party state. The simplest way to do this is to flood the country with immigrants from Third World countries, who have little interest in the Constitution and are reliable Democratic voters.

If Donald Trump is smart, he should confound the Democrats plan by closing the borders. Trump should be dramatically reducing all immigration and promoting America First, low tax, high growth policies which will win over significant numbers of working class, black, Asian and Latino voters.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: plagiarism; thanksforsharing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2017 12:29:16 PM PDT by hapnHal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Drop the “Democrat” part ,99% of parties with it in the name are really Communist/Socialist


2 posted on 03/12/2017 12:35:02 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal
John F. Kennedy. These major Democrat party leaders were fierce opponents of mass immigration because they recognized the negative impact it had on wages.

An Irishman opposing immigration because it lowers wages? There's irony for you. The Kennedys and Buchanans didn't seem to mind immigration one little bit in 1850!

3 posted on 03/12/2017 12:41:52 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

No, we don’t want the left to get any common sense. Just keep being radical and wacky on their side. We need a better message to get moderates over to our side like a well written pamphlet with companion youtube documentary.


4 posted on 03/12/2017 12:43:02 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal
No, we need a constitutionally driven party that seeks to shrink fedzilla instead of shuffling deck chairs.
5 posted on 03/12/2017 12:47:39 PM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

As was said in Roosevelt’s time I’m an Al Smith Democrat.


6 posted on 03/12/2017 12:48:12 PM PDT by ex-snook (The one true God sent Jesus here to show us the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

I watched the debate between Nixon and Kennedy on youtube.

He sounded word for word like a typical lib.

He had a few moments but he was a lib.

Why would you WANT a new and improved dem party?

And would you say italian and irish and jewish immigration were failures?


7 posted on 03/12/2017 12:48:44 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

This is a copy and paste of a World Net Daily column with a different heading.

And why the hell would we want a "new" Democrat party that is in more direct competition with the GOP? Dumb.

8 posted on 03/12/2017 1:00:49 PM PDT by IDontLikeToPayTaxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

The only trouble with replacing us was we’re still here.


9 posted on 03/12/2017 1:02:43 PM PDT by ichabod1 (The Wise Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Truman & JFK were in the military.
Last 2 RAT POTUS were not.

Does it matter ?


10 posted on 03/12/2017 1:15:18 PM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

There is a Democrat party. It is called the Repblicans party, minus the Conservatives.


11 posted on 03/12/2017 1:17:06 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Nuke Bilderberg from orbit. It''s the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Could be time for a new GOP too!


12 posted on 03/12/2017 1:19:44 PM PDT by Samurai_Jack (War is cruelty, there is no use trying to reform it; the crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

I agree a new party needs to be formed, but it should not have the word “Democrat” in it anyplace. It’s a brand name similar to what Edsel was to Ford a few decades back.

It also implies communism and socialism.

With the Republican party married to the globalists, yes, there’s room for a new truly American party.

But with our latest snowflake movement and the globalists not yet relinquishing the reins of power, it’s a long way off.

It may actually take CWII to make it happen.


13 posted on 03/12/2017 2:00:51 PM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

You mean the legal immigration in 1850.

Those immigrants didn’t want handouts and they weren’t gang bangers. Myths from Hollywood are irrelevant.


14 posted on 03/12/2017 2:14:56 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Harry Truman who tried to nationalize the steel industry and disarmed our military so badly that ‘Task Force Smith’ happened in Korea in 50’.

And Kennedy that has given us the Castro brothers off the Florida coast.


15 posted on 03/12/2017 2:33:39 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

No we don’t - let them spiral into decades of obscurity.


16 posted on 03/12/2017 2:37:45 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Those immigrants didn’t want handouts

You mean like Tammany corruption or the Oklahoma Land Rush?

and they weren’t gang bangers.

Enough were that the Irish gang stereotype had validity (Northside Mob in Chicago, Southside Boston etc.) In the same way the most Italians were law abiding, but the Mafia was and is real.

In any event, Irish immigrants were deeply despised for lowering wages in the mid 19th Century. The Nativist movement of the time was very powerful and styled themselves as Patriots.

17 posted on 03/12/2017 2:43:19 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Of the 535 members of congress, about 50 are reliably constitutionally anchored. America as we know it won’t survive with those numbers and the cronies on K-Street.

The foundation of federalism is broken. A New Democrat party will not fix it. Article V Convention of States. Eliminate the 17th Amendment, term limits, balanced budget, judicial review, and others.


18 posted on 03/12/2017 2:58:41 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

Why are you at FR?

Truman took over the steel industry with soldiers. Kennedy was a wuss on foreign policy

Democrats also gave us Woodwrow Wilson, FDR, and Bill Clinton

The history of the rats is filled with KKK insanity and the likes of Robert Nyrd

Just puhleeeze no


19 posted on 03/12/2017 3:09:14 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hapnHal

I;m sure I’m not the only one who notices that you hear very little from or about the American Communist Party. They admit they are not needed any more.


20 posted on 03/12/2017 3:43:52 PM PDT by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson