Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scarlett Johansson: 'I don't think it's natural to be a monogamous person'
Fox News ^ | February 14, 2017

Posted on 02/15/2017 10:56:06 AM PST by Olog-hai

Scarlett Johansson is having second thoughts on monogamy.

In Playboy's March/April 2017 issue, the 32-year-old “Ghost in the Shell” star admitted that she isn’t sure people are designed to be monogamous in relationships.

“I think the idea of marriage is very romantic; it’s a beautiful idea, and the practice of it can be a very beautiful thing,” said the actress. “I don’t think it’s natural to be a monogamous person. I might be skewered for that, but I think it’s work. It’s a lot of work.” …

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: destroythefamily; goddess; hollyweird; hottie; jewishmorales; johansson; keywordtrolls; liberalagenda; marriage; marriageishard; monogamous; monogamy; sexy; slutlett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Snickering Hound

There is no chance that is a old cat lady.


21 posted on 02/15/2017 11:04:09 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She does know HOW to walk in high heals.........so she’s got that going for her.


22 posted on 02/15/2017 11:04:19 AM PST by Envisioning (Trump is imposing the people's will on it's government......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
LOL... there was a scene with her in a movie with Bradley Cooper (can't recall the name of it and it was pretty forgettable), but they are making out and he grabs her from behind and shakes her up and down, and everyone in the theater laughed because she's just so jiggly.
23 posted on 02/15/2017 11:04:29 AM PST by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

She certainly is having some problems putting her coat on.


24 posted on 02/15/2017 11:04:48 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

someone who depends on the magic of Hollywoods’ Gaussian filters to appear “hot” isn’t really an expert on what’s natural.


25 posted on 02/15/2017 11:05:34 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Okay, guys, the line forms to the left.


26 posted on 02/15/2017 11:05:45 AM PST by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel
"Okay, guys, the line forms to the left..."

...behind me.

27 posted on 02/15/2017 11:06:40 AM PST by BlueLancer (Ex Scientia Tridens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
What Scarlett means is it's not "natural (difficult)" for her.

No surprise for anyone who has multiple partners prior to marriage!

28 posted on 02/15/2017 11:07:15 AM PST by zerosix ( Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yes, that’s right, it’s not “natural”. It takes work, as does all things of value in life.


29 posted on 02/15/2017 11:11:18 AM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yet it’s what God expects....


30 posted on 02/15/2017 11:11:18 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

How is this woman a popular actress? She’s built, yes, but she has a face typically seen on a Pablo Picasso painting. I find Kate Upton to be a superior actress (um ... yeah, I sincerely do :-)).

Who determines that this woman is “popular” while others can’t get a break? I get that she’s a box office draw for some idiotic reason, but I sincerely believe that if one were to replace her with a cardboard cutout of a busty woman, you’d get the same draw and audience response for a fraction of the price.

Scarlett Johannsen, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Natalie Portman ... three frigging actresses that make me wonder what kind of other talents they have to get the jobs they get. All are horrible at their job yet are deemed a success for some reason.

Yes, I am being judgemental. I, personally, have a face perfect for radio broadcasts and need to lose a few, wait, make that several pounds. However, I am not in the business of selling my looks for cash nor am I spewing garbage in magazines to make myself look all new-age open minded and vastly superior to my fellow peons (I’m only doing that on Free Republic :-) :-P ).


31 posted on 02/15/2017 11:12:09 AM PST by edh (I need a better tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Monogamy built our civilization.

Is it natural?

I do not know.

But, I do know it is divine.


32 posted on 02/15/2017 11:12:16 AM PST by Eurotwit (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Two responses.

1. From her perspective. Literally every straight man she meets wants to have sex with her. Some of them are attractive or fun or have interesting stories. If she enjoys sex, she won’t want to turn every one down.

2. From a bacterial perspective. The more bacteria you are exposed to, the more chance you will end up with some weird stuff. The more I learn the weirder it gets. Especially cancers. Promiscuity can hurt.

3. From a moral perspective. If you promise something to Gd or someone important, or BOTH as in marriage, you need to keep that promise. It is the difference between being a good person and a bad person. You can kindly break the promise as in divorce for a substantive reason. Life isn’t perfect and neither are we. Or you can do what Scarlett probably does. “Yes, we can get married, but I reserve the right to be unfaithful whenever I feel like it. I’m rich and famous and beautiful and that is the price you pay.”


33 posted on 02/15/2017 11:13:22 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

34 posted on 02/15/2017 11:14:11 AM PST by Proyecto Anonimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Wasn't she married to some Canadian actor? Ryan something, something Ryan? I think he may have been the rational one in that equation.

She must think she has to live the role of that movie she made with Bill Murray in Japan.

35 posted on 02/15/2017 11:15:43 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Well, that’s her position. One of them, at least.


36 posted on 02/15/2017 11:17:22 AM PST by PLMerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

She’s put herself in a place where genuine love has no chance. Love hasn’t been her top priority.


37 posted on 02/15/2017 11:18:20 AM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Killing people is pretty “natural”, too. That’s why there’s a Commandment prohibiting it.


38 posted on 02/15/2017 11:18:48 AM PST by AZLiberty (A is now A once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I’m sure her boyfriend/partner/husband will be very happy to hear that.

I'd like to dedicate this song to that guy: Save It For A Rainy Day, by Stephen Bishop.

39 posted on 02/15/2017 11:21:05 AM PST by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I am wondering if she is speaking of herself.. or the men she has married?

Because there is a BIG difference. If she is speaking about the men she has been with in the past, she could have just jumped to a logical conclusion based on her personal experience. BUT, the fact of the matter if that is the case it’s not true universally but in reality is just a testament to her bad choice of mates.

If she on the other hand is speaking about herself... well... then any man with a brain needs to run the other way if considering getting serious with her.


40 posted on 02/15/2017 11:21:43 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Make America Great Again !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson