.jpg)
Wisconsin Secretary of State, Democrat Doug La Follette
Posted on 11/28/2016 7:35:32 AM PST by struggle
Has to be paid for tomorrow before it begins. If Jill calls it off by defaulting on “show me the money”, then we know absolutely that it was just another Dem “pay to play”. scheme.
Any news on PA? If PA rejects her the whole thing goes to crap.
No....money due tomorrow per video.
Wisconsin, like many states, has an elected Secretary of State; the Governor isn’t really his boss. Wisconsin SoS is a Leftist kook from several generations of Leftist kooks.
It’s called “laundering”. There was no limit on any contribution and as far as I know, donors are anonymous.
Vote Fraud Monitoring Group Says Three Million Noncitizens Voted in Presidential Election
The New American ^ | 14 Nov 2016 | Warren Mass
Posted on 11/28/2016, 8:56:34 AM by KeyLargo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3499078/posts
Jill Stein Now Says Money She Raised for “Recount” May Go Elsewhere
Jim Hoft Nov 25th, 2016 12:04 pm 296 Comments
Green Party candidate Jill Stein is raising money to demand a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/jill-stein-now-says-money-raised-recount-may-go-elsewhere/
It’s been proven years ago that I do not understand money laundering. But I was also told that I should keep it that way, and thus stay out of trouble!
Jill Stein, MD used to be a worthy physician. So she should have stayed naive about money laundering, too! PHOOEY!!!!
No, he does not. He is a Democrat. Secretary of State is an elected office in Wisconsin, just as it is here in North Carolina.
Doug La Follette is not going to find many objections regarding this recount, and he will be very accommodative as far as payment arrangements. Count on it.
My friend’s 3 year old decided to wash all the “dirty” dollar bills in her bank. Dad is a cop. Mom called dad....”Can you go to jail for money laundering?”
Wisconsin Secretary of State, Democrat Doug La Follette
If that's her goal, to fund her and her fellow travelers for a few years based on cash from the pro-Hitlery snowflakes, then more power to her!
They are leaving it up to each county to decide how to count, i.e., machine versus hand count. Stein wanted a complete hand count. The results have to be in by December 12. I expect WI to cast its electoral ballot on December 19. If Trump retains his lead as anticipated, then the recounts in MI and PA are meaningless.
On the other hand, it might be fun watching pundits explain how the paper ballots in Michigan were hacked by Russian hackers. The same pundits who were saying, the first days of November, that there was absolutely no way that Trump could get to 270 electoral votes.
Wonder if the donors plan on taking a tax deduction?
There apparently is a conflict between two statutes. One says estimated fee must be paid at time of filing but another references the fee being paid when an estimate is provided. This may end up in Wisconsin court. Without the required estimate from the state authorities, how could stein pay? That will be the argument.
Los Angeles County needs a recount, bigly.
>>They should refuse Jill Stein’s request. She got 1% of the vote. How does she have standing to make the request. If Hillary wants a recount make her ask for one and pay for it.<<
WI law says ANY candidate for the seat in question can request a recount if the margin is thin enough and the requester pays.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.